Journal of Practical Hepatology ›› 2022, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (3): 383-386.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2022.03.020

• Non-alcoholic fatty liver diseases • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Implication of hepatic fat fraction by CT angiography in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver diseases and high-risk coronary plaque

Cai Dongmei, Wu Wenjuan, Jiang Yilun, et al   

  1. Department of Radiology, Xishan People's Hospital, Wuxi 214000, Jiangsu Province, China
  • Received:2021-05-20 Online:2022-05-10 Published:2022-05-17

Abstract: Objective The aim of this study was to explore the implication of hepatic fat fraction (HFF) by CT angiography (CTA) in patients with nonalcoholic Fatty liver diseases (NAFLD) and high-risk coronary plaque (HRP). Methods 168 patients with NAFLD were admitted to our hospital between January 2015 and January 2021, and all underwent CTA check-up. The HFF was automatically given atSyngo.via station. Results Out of the 168 patients with NAFLD, there were no coronary plaque in 76 cases, with coronary plaque but not risk in 48 cases and with HRP in 44 cases; the epicardial adipose tissue volume (EATV) in plaque-free, HRP negative and HRP group were 91.8(82.4, 98.3)cm3, 102.6(87.6, 120.4)cm3 and 136.2(82.4, 98.3)cm3, significantly statistically different (P < 0.05); the CT values of EAT in the three groups were -79.3(-81.2, -76.4) HU, -74.2(-77.3, -70.4)HU and -66.8(-70.5, -63.4) HU, significantly different (P < 0.05); the CT values of pericoronary adipose tissue (PAT) were -79.0(-80.6, -76.3)HU, -73.1(-75.2, -70.2)HU and -66.2(-70.1, -63.0)HU, significantly different (P < 0.05); the PAT volume (PATV) were [17.5(15.5, 18.6)cm3], [17.4(15.7, 21.8)cm3] and [18.9(17.5, 23.1)cm3], significantly different(P<0.05) among the three groups; the HFF were [6.8(5.3, 9.2)%], [8.8(7.0, 12.6)%] and [15.4(12.3, 17.8)%], significantly different(P<0.05); the CT value of liver were [(44.4±4.7)HU], [(43.2±4.6)HU] and [(39.7±4.4)HU], significantly different(P<0.05); there were significant differences in smoking habit, blood hypertension, diabetes, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), HDL, TG, TC and Framingham risk score among the three groups(P<0.05); there were significant differences in coronary artery stenosis degree, low density plaque, punctate calcified plaque, remodeling index and napkin ring sign between patients with HRP negative and with HRP (P<0.05). Conclusion As a new non-invasive imaging marker for liver fat measurement, the HFF has the advantages of simple measurement and good repeatability, which might help optimize the cardiovascular risk stratification in patients with NAFLD.

Key words: Nonalcoholic fatty liver diseases, High-risk coronary plaque, CT angiography, Liver fat fraction