实用肝脏病杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (6): 885-889.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2018.06.015

• 肝衰竭 • 上一篇    下一篇

前瞻性研究四种出血事件评估标准评估慢加急性肝衰竭患者出血事件*

于旭彤, 蒋秀华, 祁婷婷, 何钦俊, 周福元, 陈永鹏, 文维群, 陈金军   

  1. 510515 广州市 南方医科大学南方医院感染内科肝病中心
  • 收稿日期:2018-01-20 出版日期:2018-11-10 发布日期:2018-12-25
  • 通讯作者: 陈金军,E-mail: chjj@smu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:于旭彤,女,25岁,2010级临床医学八年制学生。主要从事慢加急性肝衰竭防治研究。E-mail: nancy2003yu@aliyun.com
  • 基金资助:
    *国家自然科学基金资助项目(编号:81270533/81470038); 国家重点研发计划项目(编号:2017YFC0908100); 科技部病毒性肝炎与艾滋病等传染病重大专项(编号:2018ZX10723203); 广州市重大科技项目(编号:201508020262); 广东省重大计划项目(编号:2014B020228003/2015B020226004); 南方医科大学临床研究启动计划项目(编号:LC2016PY005)

Verification of bleeding criteria in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure: A prospective study

Yu Xutong, Jiang Xiuhua, Qi Tingting, et al.   

  1. Centre of Liver Disease Study,Department of Infectious Diseases,Nanfang Hospital,Southern Medical University,Guangzhou 510515,Guangdong Province,China
  • Received:2018-01-20 Online:2018-11-10 Published:2018-12-25

摘要: 目的 探讨应用常用的四种出血事件评估标准判断慢加急性肝衰竭(ACLF)患者出血事件。方法 在56例非-ACLF、26例达到亚太肝病协会发布标准的ACLF(APASL-ACLF)和12例达到欧洲肝病学会(EASL)发布的ACLF(EASL-ACLF)患者,采用出血学术研究会标准(BARC)、心肌梗死溶栓标准(TIMI)、开通闭塞冠状动脉策略的全球性研究标准(GUSTO)和国际血栓与止血委员会标准(ISTH)分别进行量化评分,观察28 d和90 d生存情况。结果 本组57.6%患者在住院期间发生出血事件,致死性出血事件发生率为1.1%;非ACLF组出血发生率为41.1%,显著低于APASL-ACLF组或EASL-ACLF组的76.9%和100.0%(P<0.05);有出血事件组28 d和90 d病死率分别为13.0%和24.5%,显著高于无出血组的0.0%和 0.0%(P<0.01);BARC标准、TIMI标准和GUSTO标准判断28 d短期预后的受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)下面积(AUC)分别为0.880(95%CI:0.747~1.000)、0.801(95%CI:0.653~0.94)和0.841(95%CI:0.697~0.984),均显著低于ISTH标准的0.95(95%CI:0.861~1.000,P<0.05)。结论 ACLF患者出血事件发生率较高,随着疾病严重程度增加而增多,但致死性出血事件少见。在四种出血评分标准中,经验证,ISTH标准适用性最好。

关键词: 慢加急性肝衰竭, 出血评分标准, 短期预后

Abstract: Objective The aim of this prospective study is to verify four bleeding criteria in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure(ACLF). Method We prospectively enrolled 56 patients with non-ACLF,26 with Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL)-ACLF and 12 with European Association for the Study of the Liver(EASL)-ACLF),and evaluated their bleeding events by using four bleeding criteria,e.g. Bleeding Academic Research Consortium(BARC),Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction(TIMI),Global Use of Strategies To Open Coronary Arteries(GUSTO) and International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH). Result Out of the 94 patients,bleeding events occurred in 57.6%,and lethal bleeding events was 1.1%;the bleeding incidence in patients with non-ACLF was 41.1%,significant lower than 76.9% in patients with APASL-ACLF or 100.0% in patients with EASL-ACLF(both P<0.05);patients with bleeding had higher 28 day and 90 day mortality rate than those without bleeding (13.0% vs. 0.0% and 24.5% vs. 0.0%,respectively,P<0.05);the area under curve of receiver operating characteristic(AUC) in predicting 28 day mortality by ISTH was 0.95 (95%CI:0.861-1.000),significant wider than by BARC[0.880(95%CI:0.747-1.000,P<0.05)] or by TIMI [0.801(95%CI:0.653-0.948,P<0.05)]. Conclusion Bleeding events are common in patients with ACLF and the incidence increases in accordance with the severity of the diseases,though the fatal bleeding events are rare. ISTH bleeding criteria is recommended for assessment of hemorrhagic events in patients with ACLF.

Key words: Acute-on-chronic liver failure, Bleeding criteria, Short-term prognosis