实用肝脏病杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (5): 709-712.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2026.05.018

• 肝硬化 • 上一篇    下一篇

肝脏磁共振DWI参数预测肝硬化并发高风险食管静脉曲张价值研究*

文婷, 贾雨阳, 冯流平   

  1. 448000 湖北省荆门市 荆楚理工学院附属荆门市人民医院超声诊断科(文婷,贾雨阳);急诊科(冯流平)
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-31 发布日期:2026-09-14
  • 通讯作者: 冯流平,E-mail:724840794@qq.com
  • 作者简介:文婷,女,39岁,大学本科,主治医师。E-mail:lmwtin@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    湖北省卫生健康委员会青年人才基金资助项目(编号:WJ2019Q014)

Application of liver DWI parameters in predicting patients with liver cirrhosis and high-risk esophageal varices

Wen Ting, Jia Yuyang, Feng Liuping   

  1. Department of Ultrasonography, People's Hospital Affiliated to Jingchu Institute of Technology, Jingmen 448000, Hubei Province, China
  • Received:2025-12-31 Published:2026-09-14

摘要: 目的 探讨磁共振(MR)弥散加权成像(DWI)参数预测肝硬化并发高风险食管静脉曲张(HREV)的应用价值。方法 2023年8月~2025年8月我院收治的94例乙型肝炎肝硬化并发食管静脉曲张(EV)患者,均接受胃镜和MR检查,分别记录HREV例数及表观扩散系数(ADC)、真实扩散系数(D)、灌注相关扩散系数(D*)和灌注分数(f),应用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估诊断效能。结果 在94例肝硬化患者中,胃镜检查发现轻度EV者35例,中度者33例,重度者26例,其中存在HREV患者46例(48.9%),无高风险静脉曲张(NHREV)者48例(51.1%);不同Child-Pugh分级和不同程度EV患者DWI参数存在显著性差异(P<0.05);HREV组ADC值和D值分别为(1.1±0.2)×10-3mm2/s和(1.0±0.1)×10-3mm2/s,均显著小于NHREV组【分别为(1.4±0.3)×10-3mm2/s和(1.3±0.2)×10-3mm2/s,P<0.05】,而D*值和f值分别为(45.7±12.4)×10-3mm2/s和(28.6±6.4)%,均显著大于NHREV组【分别为(32.6±10.8)×10-3mm2/s和(21.8±5.7)%,P<0.05】;经ROC曲线分析显示,在ADC值、D值、D*值和f值中任三项指标达到诊断的截断点联合预测肝硬化并发HREV的灵敏度为92.3%,但特异性只有70.8%(P<0.05)。结论 肝脏DWI参数预测肝硬化并发HREV具有一定的临床应用价值,可综合临床资料,决定进一步处理措施的实施。

关键词: 肝硬化, 食管静脉曲张, 磁共振成像, 弥散加权成像, 表观扩散系数, 真实扩散系数, 诊断

Abstract: Objective The aim of this study was to explore the application of MR liver diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) parameters in predicting patients with liver cirrhosis (LC) and high-risk esophageal varices (HREV). Methods The clinical data were collected from 94 patients with hepatitis B-induced LC in our hospital between August 2023 and August 2025, and all underwent gastroscopy and MR DWI to measure and record apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), true diffusion coefficient (D), perfusion-related diffusion coefficient (D*) and perfusion fraction (f). The diagnostic efficacy was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results Of the 94 patients with LC, gastroscopy found mild EV in 35 cases, moderate in 33 cases and severe in 26 cases, and HREV in 46 cases (48.9%) and non-HREV(NHREV) in 48 cases (51.1%); DWI parameters differed significantly among patients with different Child-Pugh classes and with different degrees of EV(P<0.05); ADC and D in patients with HREV were (1.1±0.2)×10-3mm2/s and (1.0±0.1)×10-3mm2/s,both much smaller than [(1.4±0.3)×10-3mm2/s and (1.3±0.2)×10-3mm2/s, respectively, P<0.05],while D* and f were (45.7±12.4)×10-3mm2/s and (28.6±6.4)%,both much greater than [(32.6±10.8)×10-3mm2/s and (21.8±5.7)%,respectively, P<0.05] in patients with NHREV; ROC analysis showed that the sensitivity was 92.3% while the specificity was 70.8%(P<0.05), when combination DWI parameters, e.g., ADC, D, D* and f, any three of them reaching to cut-off-value was set to predict HREV in patients with LC. Conclusion Application of MR DWI parameters of the liver could be useful in predicting HREV in patients with LC, which might help clinicians make further decisions of interventions.

Key words: Liver cirrhosis, High-risk esophageal varices, Magnetic resonance imaging, Diffusion-weighted imaging, Apparent diffusion coefficient, True diffusion coefficient, Diagnosis