实用肝脏病杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (5): 681-684.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2026.05.011

• 自身免疫性肝病 • 上一篇    下一篇

FibroTouch技术联合APRI评分评估原发性胆汁性胆管炎患者肝纤维化程度价值分析*

韩敏, 何明玲, 张栋邦, 才新   

  1. 810000 青海省西宁市 青海红十字医院消化内科(韩敏);急诊科(张栋邦,才新);青海大学附属医院老年医学一科(何明玲)
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-30 发布日期:2026-09-14
  • 通讯作者: 才新,E-mail:18997205992@163.com
  • 作者简介:韩敏,女,39岁,大学本科,主治医师。E-mail:yan18997159409@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    青海省卫生健康委员会科研项目(编号:2021-wjzdx-63)

Prediction of significant liver fibrosis by FibroTouch detection in combination with APRI score in patients with primary biliary cholangitis

Han Min, He Mingling, Zhang Dongbang, et al   

  1. Department of Gastroenterology, Red Cross Hospital, Xining 810000, Qinghai Province, China
  • Received:2025-12-30 Published:2026-09-14

摘要: 目的 探讨FibroTouch技术联合天冬氨酸氨基转移酶/血小板比值指数(APRI)评分评估原发性胆汁性胆管炎(PBC)患者肝纤维化程度的价值。方法 2021年6月~2025年6月我院诊治的110例PBC患者,均接受肝组织穿刺活检和FibroTouch行肝硬度检测(LSM),常规临床检测,计算APRI。应用受试者工作特征曲线评估诊断效能。结果 在110例PBC患者中,组织病理学检查诊断肝纤维化S0期18例,S1期25例,S2期32例,S3期21例和S4期14例,即显著性肝纤维化67例,非显著性肝纤维化43例;随着肝纤维化分期进展,PBC患者LSM值和APRI评分均呈显著升高趋势:S0期LSM值为(5.0±1.1)kPa,APRI评分为(0.3±0.1),S1期分别为(6.8±1.3)kPa和(0.5±0.2),S2期分别为(9.2±2.0)kPa和(0.8±0.3),S3期分别为(12.4±2.7)kPa和(1.4±0.5),S4期分别为(15.8±3.6)kPa和(2.1±0.6),组间比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);ROC分析显示,单独应用LSM诊断PBC患者显著性肝纤维化的特异性为94.4%,而应用LSM联合APRI评分预测PBC患者显著性肝纤维化的灵敏度为81.5%,特异度为83.7%。结论 采用FibroTouch技术检测LSM联合APRI评分可初步评估PBC患者显著性肝纤维化,为进一步临床处理提供诊断线索。

关键词: 原发性胆汁性胆管炎, 肝硬度检测, 天冬氨酸氨基转移酶/血小板比值指数, 肝纤维化, 诊断

Abstract: Objective The aim of this study was to investigate prediction of significant liver fibrosis (SLF) by FibroTouch detection in combination with aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) score in patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). Methods A total of 110 patients with PBC were encountered in out hospital between June 2021 and June 2025, all underwent FibroTouch detection for liver stiffness measurement (LSM), and APRI was calculated based clinical materials. Liver biopsies were performed and liver fibrosis was determined by Ludwig staging system. Predicting efficacy was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results Of the 110 patients with PBC, liver histopathological examination found liver fibrosis S0 in 18 cases, S1 in 25 cases, S2 in 32 cases, S3 in 21 cases and S4 in 14 cases, e.g., SLF in 67 cases and non-SLF (NSLF) in 43 cases; with the progression of liver fibrosis staging, LSM and APRI score increased gradually in PBC patients, e.g., LSM and APRI scores in S0, S1, S2, S3 and S4 were [(5.0±1.1) kPa and (0.3±0.1)], [(6.8±1.3) kPa and (0.5±0.2)], [(9.2±2.0) kPa and (0.8±0.3)], [(12.4±2.7) kPa and (1.4±0.5)] and [(15.8±3.6) kPa and (2.1±0.6)], respectively, with statistically significantly different among different stage groups (P<0.05); ROC analysis showed that the specificity (Sp) was 94.4% by LSM alone in predicting SLF in patients with PBC, while sensitivity was 81.5% and Sp was 83.7% by combination of LSM and APRI score. Conclusion FibroTouch technology in combination with APRI score could preliminarily evaluate SLF in patients with PBC, which might guide clinicians for further interventions.

Key words: Primary biliary cholangitis, Liver stiffness measurement, Aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index, Liver fibrosis, Diagnosis