胆囊息肉样病变直径对判断息肉性质的价值分析*

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2020.01.035

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨胆囊息肉直径对判断息肉性质的价值。方法 2010年1月～2019年3月我科诊治的胆囊息肉患者420例,接受开放或腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗。采用多因素Logistic回归分析胆囊癌发生的危险因素,绘制受试者工作特征曲线(ROC曲线),计算不同胆囊息肉直径预测息肉恶变的曲线下面积(AUC)、敏感性和特异性。结果经术后组织病理学检查,诊断良性胆囊息肉388例,恶性胆囊息肉32例;良性胆囊息肉患者年龄为(46.6±8.7)岁,显著小于恶性胆囊息肉患者;良性胆囊息肉直径为6(2,27)mm,显著小于恶性胆囊息肉直径;良恶性息肉患者性别构成、胆囊息肉数目、胆囊结石、癌胚抗原、CA19-9和空腹血糖等均无显著性统计学差异(P>0.05);经多因素分析,发现胆囊息肉直径是胆囊癌发生的独立危险因素(P<0.05,OR=1.52,95%CI:1.36～1.69);绘制胆囊息肉直径ROC曲线,得出AUC为0.89(0.85～0.93),即当息肉直径为13 mm时,诊断胆囊癌的敏感性和特异性分别为91.0%和71.8%。结论胆囊息肉直径预测胆囊癌的价值较高,当息肉直径>13 mm时,因恶变风险增大,建议手术治疗。

关键词: 胆囊息肉, 胆囊切除术, 息肉直径, 风险分析

Abstract: Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical value of diameters of gallbladder polyp in forecasting carcinogenesis. Methods 420 patients with gallbladder polyps were recruited in our hospital between January 2010 and March 2019, and all patients underwent open or laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis was applied to determine the risk factors of gallbladder carcinogenesis. The area under ROC curve (AUC) was drawn for sensitivity and specificity in predicting the malignant transformation of polyps with different diameters of gallbladder polyps. Results 388 patients had benign and 32 had malignant gallbladder polyps proven by post-operational histopathological examination; the age of patients with benign gallbladder polyps was (46.6 ±8.7) years, significantly younger than in patients with malignant gallbladder polyps; the diameter of benign gallbladder polyps was 6 (2, 27) mm, significantly less than in patients with malignant gallbladder polyps; there were no significant differences as respect to gender, number of gallbladder polyps, gallstone, serum carcinoembryonic antigen and CA19-9 levels and fasting blood glucose between patients with benign and malignant polyps; the multivariate analysis showed that the diameter of gallbladder polyps was an independent risk factor affecting the nature of gallbladder polyps (P < 0.05, OR =1.52, 95% CI:1.36-1.69); the ROC curve analysis demonstrated that the AUC was 0.89 (0.85 to 0.93), e.g. when the diameter of polyps was equal to 13 mm, the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 91.0% and 71.8%, respectively. Conclusions The diameter of gallbladder polyps is of high value in predicting gallbladder carcinoma. When the diameter is greater than 13 mm, the possibility of malignant transformation of gallbladder polyps is higher, and we recommend that the gallbladder polyps should be excised as soon as possible.

Key words: Gallbladder polyp, Cholecystectomy, Polyp diameter, Risk of malignance

宋彦伟, 程军, 罗威, 蒋丽萍. 胆囊息肉样病变直径对判断息肉性质的价值分析^*[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2020, 23(1): 130-133.

Song Yanwei, Cheng Jun, Luo Wei, et al. Diameters of gallbladder polyp in forecasting carcinogenesis[J]. Journal of Practical Hepatology, 2020, 23(1): 130-133.

参考文献

[1] Choi YS, Do JH, Seo SW, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of gallbladder polypoid lesions in a healthy population. Yonsei Med J, 2016, 57(6):1370-1375.
[2] Mao YS, Mai YF, Li FJ, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of gallbladder polypoid lesions in Chinese petrochemical employees. World J Gastroenterol, 2013, 19(27):4393-4399.
[3] Fong Y, Jarnagin W, Blumgart LH. Gallbladder cancer: comparison of patients presenting initially for definitive operation with those presenting after prior noncurative intervention. Ann Surg, 2000, 232(4):557-569.
[4] Foster JM, Hoshi H, Gibbs JF, et al. Gallbladder cancer: Defining the indications for primary radical resection and radical re-resection. Ann Surg Oncol, 2007, 14(2):833-840.
[5] Wiles R, Thoeni RF, Barbu ST, et al. Management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps : Joint guidelines between the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR), European Association for Endoscopic Surgery and other Interventional Techniques (EAES), International Society of Digestive Surgery 8136 European Federation (EFISDS) and European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). Eur Radiol, 2017, 27(9):3856-3866.
[6] 中华医学会外科学分会胆道外科学组. 胆囊良性疾病治疗决策的专家共识(2011年版).中华消化外科杂志, 2011, 10(1):14-19.
[7] Laghi A, Neri E, Regge D. Editorial on the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) guideline on clinical indications for CT colonography in the colorectal cancer diagnosis. Radiol Med, 2015, 120(11):1021-1023.
[8] Park JK, Yoon YB, Kim YT, et al. Management strategies for gallbladder polyps: is it possible to predict malignant gallbladder polyps? Gut Liver, 2008, 2(2): 88-94.
[9] Pedersen MR, Dam C, Rafaelsen SR. Ultrasound follow-up for gallbladder polyps less than 6 mm may not be necessary. Dan Med J, 2012, 59(10):A4503.
[10] Corwin MT, Siewert B, Sheiman RG, et al. Incidentally detected gallbladder polyps: is follow-up necessary?--Long-term clinical and US analysis of 346 patients. Radiology, 2011, 258(1):277-282.
[11] Kwon W, Jang JY, Lee SE, et al. Clinicopathologic features of polypoid lesions of the gallbladder and risk factors of gallbladder cancer. J Korean Med Sci, 2009, 24(3):481-487.
[12] Yeh CN,Jan YY,Chao TC, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for polypoid lesions of the gallbladder: a clinicopathologic study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech,2001, 11(3):176-181.
[13] Kozuka S, Tsubone N, Yasui A, et al. Relation of adenoma to carcinoma in the gallbladder.Cancer, 1982, 50(10):2226-2234.
[14] Wistuba II, Miquel JF, Gazdar AF, et al. Gallbladder adenomas have molecular abnormalities different from those present in gallbladder carcinomas. Hum Pathol, 1999, 30(1):21-25.
[15] Roa I, de Aretxabala X, Araya JC, et al. Preneoplastic lesions in gallbladder cancer.J Surg Oncol, 2006, 93(8):615-623.
[16] Cha BH, Hwang JH, Lee SH, et al. Pre-operative factors that can predict neoplastic polypoid lesions of the gallbladder. World J Gastroenterol, 2011, 17(17):2216-2222.
[17] Zielinski MD,Atwell TD,Davis PW, et al. Comparison of surgically resected polypoid lesions of the gallbladder to their pre-operative ultrasound characteristics. J Gastrointest Surg, 2009, 13(1):19-25.
[18] Chou SC,Chen SC,Shyr YM, et al. Polypoid lesions of the gallbladder: analysis of 1204 patients with long-term follow-up. Surg Endosc,2017,31(7):2776-2782.
[19] 陈少华,王成方,李会星,等. 胆囊息肉恶变的危险因素分析. 中华消化外科杂志,2019,18(2):146-151.
[20] Terzi C, Sökmen S, Seçkin S, et al. Polypoid lesions of the gallbladder: report of 100 cases with special reference to operative indications. Surgery, 2000, 127(6):622-627.

胆囊息肉样病变直径对判断息肉性质的价值分析^*

Diameters of gallbladder polyp in forecasting carcinogenesis

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 14

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	漆若毅, 李洋. 基于因子-聚类分析胆囊切除术后综合征中医证候变化研究^*[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2020, 23(1): 126-129.
[2]	周志林, 梅勇, 杨旭辉, 戴军. 经皮经肝胆囊穿刺引流术联合延期胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎患者近期疗效研究^*[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2019, 22(4): 597-600.
[3]	胡若男, 胡超华. 快速康复理念下多模式镇痛在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的应用研究[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2018, 21(5): 777-780.
[4]	俞阳, 陈中皓, 廖作富, 李军. 腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗酒精性肝硬化合并胆囊结石患者临床疗效及其并发症相关危险因素分析[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2018, 21(3): 364-367.
[5]	高俊, 陈功. 不同方法胆囊切除术对胆结石患者血清免疫球蛋白和肠黏膜损伤程度的影响[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2018, 21(3): 443-446.
[6]	牛四明. 不同Calot三角解剖入路腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆囊结石伴慢性胆囊炎患者疗效对比分析[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2018, 21(3): 447-450.
[7]	王磊. 手术治疗胆石症并发急性胰腺炎患者血清炎症和氧化应激介质的变化[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2018, 21(2): 273-276.
[8]	闫凌, 张盈, 张晨光. 两种手术方案治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者效果比较研究[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2018, 21(2): 301-302.
[9]	陈晟. 实施腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎患者手术时机选择和临床效果分析[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2018, 21(2): 303-304.
[10]	冯英备，董刚，刘淑亚. 择期和急诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎患者临床效果比较研究[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2017, 20(5): 635-636.
[11]	童庆华，彭涛，丁云，邹卫华. 不同手术方法治疗老年急性化脓性胆囊炎患者临床疗效和安全性分析[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2016, 19(6): 740-741.
[12]	鲁德斌，刘西平，胡林忠. 腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹胆囊切除术治疗胆囊结石患者外周血淋巴细胞和细胞因子水平的变化[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2016, 19(3): 335-338.
[13]	庞刚，张勇. 全身麻醉联合硬膜外麻醉在老年高血压患者腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的应用[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2015, 18(4): 403-406.
[14]	刘英, 刘勇, 张立华. 彩色多普勒超声检查诊断胆囊息肉样病变的价值分析[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2012, 15(1): 65-66.