实用肝脏病杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (2): 195-198.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2022.02.011

• 病毒性肝炎 • 上一篇    下一篇

应用艾尔巴韦/格拉瑞韦治疗基因1b型慢性丙型肝炎初治和经治患者效果对比研究*

孙皆齐, 姜绍文, 汪铮   

  1. 214016 江苏省无锡市第五人民医院感染病科(孙皆齐,姜绍文);上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院感染病科(汪铮)
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-06 出版日期:2022-03-10 发布日期:2022-03-15
  • 通讯作者: 汪铮,E-mail:wangzheng79@sina.com
  • 作者简介:孙皆齐,男,36岁,大学本科。E-mail:djjieqi9@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    *江苏省高等学校自然科学研究项目(编号:18KJB230011)

Comparison of virologic response to elbavir/glarevir therapy innaïve and re-treated patients with chronic hepatitis C with HCV genotype 1b infection

Sun Jieqi, Jiang Shaowen, Wang Zheng   

  1. Department of Infectious Diseases, Fifth People's Hospital, Wuxi 214016,Jiangsu Province, China
  • Received:2021-12-06 Online:2022-03-10 Published:2022-03-15

摘要: 目的 观察应用艾尔巴韦/格拉瑞韦治疗基因1b型慢性丙型肝炎(CHC)初治和经治患者的效果。方法 2019年1月~2020年3月我院收治的初治CHC 患者59例和经治CHC 患者56例,均接受艾尔巴韦/格拉瑞韦治疗12 w,随访24 w。采用实时荧光定量RT-PCR法检测血清HCV RNA载量,常规检测血清层黏蛋白(LN)、透明质酸酶(HA)、Ⅲ型前胶原N端肽(PC-Ⅲ)和Ⅳ型胶原(Ⅳ-C)。考核快速病毒学应答(RVR)、治疗结束时病毒学应答(ETVR)和持续病毒学应答(SVR)。结果 治疗后,两组血清ALT、AST和TSB水平比较,无统计学差异(P>0.05);两组血清LN、HA、PC-Ⅲ和Ⅳ-C水平比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);在治疗结束时,初治组血清ALT复常率和HCV RNA阴转率分别为96.6%和98.3%,与经治组的98.2%和100.0%比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);初治组RVR、ETVR和SVR分别为89.8%、94.9%和93.2%,与经治组的91.1%、98.2%和98.2%比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);本组患者在口服直接抗病毒药物后,未出现严重的血液系统不良反应,仅有少数患者出现头痛、头晕、恶心、呕吐和腹泻等,自愈或经对症处理后,好转或消失。结论 应用艾尔巴韦/格拉瑞韦治疗基因1b型CHC初治和经治患者均可获得病毒学应答,且无明显的不良反应,值得进一步验证。

关键词: 慢性丙型肝炎, 基因1b型, 初治, 经治, 艾尔巴韦/格拉瑞韦, 治疗

Abstract: Objective The aim of this clinical trial was to compare the virologic response (VR) to elbavir/glarevir therapy in naïve and re-treated patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) with HCV genotype 1b infection. Methods 59 naïve and 56 re-treated patients with HCV gene type 1b infected CHC, the latter had failed to response to peg-interferon-α2b treatment, were recruited in our hospital between January 2019 and March 2020, and all patients with CHC were treated by orally elbavir/glarevir for 12 weeks. All the patients were followed-up for 24 weeks. Serum HCV RNA loads were detected by real-time fluorescent quantitative RT-PCR. Serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and total bilirubin (TSB), and serum laminin (LN), hyaluronidase (HA), type Ⅲ procollagen N-terminal peptide (PC-Ⅲ) and type Ⅳ collagen (Ⅳ-C) were routinely detected. The rapid virologic response (RVR), end treatment virologic response (ETVR) and sustained virologic response (SVR) were evaluated. Results After treatment, there were no statistical differences as respect to serum ALT, AST and total bilirubin levels between the two groups (P>0.05), and there were also no statistical differences in serum LN, HA, PC-Ⅲ and Ⅳ-C levels between the two groups (P>0.05); the serum ALT normalization rate and serum HCV RNA loss rate in naïve patients with CHC were 96.6% and 98.3%, both not significantly different as compared to 98.2% and 100.0% in re-treated patients with CHC (P>0.05); the RVR, ETVR and SVR were 89.8%, 94.9% and 93.2%, not significantly different compared to 91.1%, 98.2% and 98.2%, respectively, in re-treated patients (P>0.05); there were some cases with headache, dizziness, nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea, which disappeared gradually or after appropriate management, without untoward reactions in our series during the regimen. Conclusion The therapeutic efficacy of elbavir/glarevir is promising in patients with naïve or re-treated CHC, without obvious adverse reactions, and warrants further clinical investigation.

Key words: Hepatitis C, Genotype 1b, Elbavir/glarevir, Naïive, Re-treated, Therapy