实用肝脏病杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (1): 30-33.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2022.01.008

• 病毒性肝炎 • 上一篇    下一篇

索磷布韦维帕他韦治疗慢性丙型肝炎患者疗效和安全性观察:一项单中心真实世界回顾性分析

包飞云, 李彤, 王玉珊, 张亚萍, 李娟, 麻爱娣, 刘元元, 张岭漪   

  1. 730030 兰州市 兰州大学第二医院肝病科
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-18 发布日期:2022-01-12
  • 通讯作者: 张岭漪,E-mail: eryzhangly@lzu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:包飞云,女,28岁,硕士研究生。主要从事急慢性肝脏病诊治研究。E-mail:1952762019@qq.com

Real-world study of efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir in treatment of patients with hepatitis C and hepatitis C precipitated liver cirrhosis in a single centre of western-north China

Bao Feiyun, Li Tong, Wang Yushan, et al   

  1. Department of Liver Diseases, Second Affiliated Hospital, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730030, Gansu Province, China
  • Received:2021-03-18 Published:2022-01-12

摘要: 目的 回顾性分析索磷布韦维帕他韦(SOF/VEL)联合利巴韦林(RBV)治疗慢性丙型肝炎(CHC)患者真实世界研究(RWS)的疗效和安全。方法 2018年5月~2020年4月初治/PR经治的CHC患者32例和代偿期丙型肝炎肝硬化(CHC-CLC)患者36例,接受SOF/VEL治疗12 w,失代偿期丙型肝炎肝硬化(CHC-DLC)或合并肝细胞癌(HCC)患者31例,接受SOF/VEL联合利巴韦林(RBV)治疗12 w。部分患者合并存在高血压、糖尿病、肿瘤和慢性乙型肝炎。采用RT-PCR法检测HCV基因型(GTs)。结果 本组HCV 感染患者以GT 2a(55.6%)和GT1b(34.3%)为主;CHC、CHC-CLC和CHC-DLC患者早期病毒学应答(EVR4)分别为90.6%、86.1%、83.9%,治疗结束病毒学应答(EOT)均为100.0%,CHC组和CHC-CLC组SVR12和SVR24均为100.0%,CHC-DLC组 SVR12和SVR24均为93.5%,三组间EVR4、EOT、SVR12、SVR24均无显著性差异(P>0.05);所有患者SVR12和SVR24均为97.8%,除GT3b型外其他GTs感染患者SVR12和SVR24均为100.0%;三组血生化学应答率分别为87.5%、83.3%和74.2%;本组总体不良反应(AE)发生率为12.1%,无严重AE或因AE停药和死亡事件发生。结论 应用SOF/VEL或联合RBV治疗CHC或相关的肝硬化患者,无论何种基因型感染,均有良好的效果,且安全。

关键词: 慢性丙型肝炎, 索磷布韦/维帕他韦, 真实世界, 疗效, 安全性

Abstract: Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) in treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) and hepatitis C precipitated liver cirrhosis in real-world study (RWS) in a single centre. Method This RWS included naïve or PR-treated patients with CHC, some concomitant with blood hypertension, diabetes, tumor or hepatitis, between May 2018 and April 2020. 32 patients with CHC and 36 patients with compensated hepatitis C -induced liver cirrhosis (CHC-CLC) received SOF/VEL for 12 weeks, and 31 patients with decompensated hepatitis C liver cirrhosis (CHC-DLC) or hepatocellular carcinoma received SOF/VEL and ribavirin (RBV) for 12 weeks. The HCV genotypes (GTs) were determined by RT-PCR. Results The prevalence of GT 2a(55.6%) and GT1b(34.3%) was dominant in our series; the early virological response (EVR4)in patients with CHC, CHC-CLC and CHC-DLC were 90.6%, 86.1% and 83.9%, the end of treatment (EOT) virologic response were 100.0% in the three groups, the sustained virological response (SVR) 12 and SVR24 in patients with CHC and CHC-CLC were 100.0% and 100.0% and both the SVR12 and SVR24 in patients with CHC-DLC were 93.5%, not significantly different among the three groups(P>0.05); both the SVR12 and SVR24 in our series was 97.8%, and they reached 100.0% when the patients with GT3b infection were excluded; the biochemical responses rates in the three groups were 87.5%, 83.3% and 74.2%, and the incidence of adverse event (AE) in our series was 12.1%, no severe AE or discontinuation of therapy owning to AE occurred. Conclusion The efficacy of SOF/VEL and/or with RBV in treating patients with CHC and CHC-precipitated liver diseases is good and promising, without severe untoward effects.

Key words: Hepatitis C, Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir, Real world, Efficacy, Safety