实用肝脏病杂志 ›› 2015, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (6): 659-662.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2015.06.023

• 胆石症 • 上一篇    下一篇

腹腔镜下硬性胆道镜联合气压弹道碎石取石术治疗肝内胆管结石患者疗效观察

周亚龙, 林云志, 曾凯   

  1. 571159 海口市 解放军第187中心医院肝胆外科
  • 收稿日期:2015-05-07 出版日期:2015-11-20 发布日期:2016-02-04
  • 作者简介:周亚龙,男,49岁,大学本科,主任医师。研究方向:肝胆胰外科疾病的诊治。E-mail:aihui0506@yeah.net

Clinical efficacy of laparoscopic hard choledochoscopy and pneumatic ballistic lithotripsy in the treatment of patients with hepatolithiasis

Zhou Yalong, Lin Yunzhi, Zeng Kai.   

  1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery,187th Hospital,Haikou 571159,Hainan Province
  • Received:2015-05-07 Online:2015-11-20 Published:2016-02-04

摘要: 目的探讨腹腔镜下硬性胆道镜联合气压弹道碎石取石术治疗肝内胆管结石的疗效及安全性。方法在69例肝内胆管结石患者中,34例(对照组)接受传统手术治疗,35例(观察组)接受腹腔镜下硬性胆道镜联合气压弹道碎石取石术治疗。采用免疫速率散射比浊法检测血清免疫球蛋白水平;比较两组患者手术相关指标的变化情况。结果观察组手术时间、术中出血量、T管拔除时间和胃肠功能恢复时间分别为(117.37±10.02)min、(115.32±10.08) mL、(18.55±3.86) h和(2.11±0.65) h,均显著小于对照组[分别为(159.39±12.17) min、(254.02±22.38) mL、(37.32±5.45) h和(3.73±1.07) h,P<0.05];观察组患者下床活动时间、肛门排气时间、住院时间和残余结石发生率分别为(4.90±0.71) d、(33.08±5.45) h、(16.53±3.07) d和8.57%,均显著小于对照组[分别为(6.59±1.22) d、(58.02±10.11) h、(21.02±4.04) d和50.00%,P<0.05];对照组术后血清 IgG、IgM和IgA水平均显著低于观察组(P<0.05);观察组术后并发症发生率为11.43%,显著低于对照组的35.29%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论与传统手术相比,腹腔镜下硬性胆道镜联合气压弹道碎石取石术治疗肝内胆管结石患者,疗效显著,对机体免疫功能的影响较小,术后并发症发生率较低。

关键词: 肝内胆管结石, 硬性胆道镜, 气压弹道碎石取石术, 腹腔镜, 治疗

Abstract: Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of laparoscopic hard choledochoscopy and pneumatic ballistic lithotripsy in the treatment of patients with intrahepatic bile duct stones. Methods 69 patients with hepatolithiasis were randomly divided into the control group (n=34) and the observation group (n= 35) according to the operation they received. The patients in the control group received traditional surgery,and in the observation group received laparoscopic hard choledochoscope and pneumatic ballistic lithotripsy. Serum IgG,IgM and Ig A levels were detected. Results The operation time,blood loss,T tube removal time and gastrointestinal function recovery time in the observation group were(117.37±10.02) min,(115.32±10.08) mL, (18.55±3.86) h and(2.11±0.65) h,respectively,significantly different as compared to those in the control group [(159.39±12.17) min,(254.02±22.38) mL,(37.32±5.45) h and (3.73±1.07) h,respectively,P<0.05];the ambulation,flatus, hospital stay and residual stone occurrence were(4.90±0.71) d,(33.08±5.45) h,(16.53±3.07) d and 8.57% in the observation group, significantly different compared to those in the control group[(6.59±1.22) d,(58.02±10.11) h,(21.02±4.04) d and 50.00%,respectively,P<0.05];serum levels of IgG,IgM and IgA in the observation group after operation were significantly higher than in the control group(P<0.05);the postoperative complication rate in the observation group was 11.43%,significantly lower than 35.29% in the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with traditional surgery,laparoscopic hard choledochoscopy and pneumatic ballistic lithotripsy in the treatment of patients with hepatolithiasis has a good efficacy with low complications.

Key words: Hepatolithiasis, Laparoscopic hard choledochoscopy, Pneumatic ballistic lithotripsy, Therapy