实用肝脏病杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (5): 745-748.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2026.05.027

• 肝移植 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于血清IL-34、ADR和MELD评分构建早期移植物功能障碍预警模型:一项肝移植预后评估研究*

赵宇皓, 张和钊, 张瑞, 史志勇, 樊永强, 刘晓东, 徐钧   

  1. 030000 ,山西省太原市 山西医科大学第一医院肝胆外科
  • 收稿日期:2026-02-24 发布日期:2026-09-14
  • 通讯作者: 徐钧,E-mail:junxuty1@163.com
  • 作者简介:赵宇皓,男,27岁,硕士研究生,住院医师。主要从事肝移植研究。E-mail:xyx253366@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(编号:82470693);山西省重点研发计划项目(编号:202302130501013);山西省重点实验室计划项目(编号:202204010931008)

Construction and validation of predicting model by combination of serum IL-34, ADR and MELD in recipients with liver transplant for early allograft dysfunction

Zhao Yuhao, Zhang Hezhao, Zhang Rui, et al   

  1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Hospital, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030000, Shanxi Province, China
  • Received:2026-02-24 Published:2026-09-14

摘要: 目的 探讨基于血清白细胞介素-34(IL-34)、丙氨酸氨基转移酶/直接胆红素比值(ADR)和终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分构建的多因素预警模型预测肝移植(LT)术后早期移植物功能障碍(EAD)的价值。方法 2020年1月~2024年12月我院接受同种异体LT手术治疗的156例患者,采用ELISA法检测血清IL-34水平,常规检测血生化指标,计算丙氨酸氨基转移酶/直接胆红素比值(ADR)和终末期肝病模型(MELD)。采用多因素Logistic回归分析和应用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估预测效能。结果 在术后7 d内,发生LT术后EAD者 27例(17.3%),未发生EAD者129例(82.7%);EAD组术前肝功能 Child-Pugh C级占比和MELD评分均显著高于非EAD组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);EAD组血清IL-34、ALT、直接胆红素(DBIL)和ADR分别为(87.6±15.3)pg/mL、(1865.4±320.8)U/L、(58.3±12.4)μmol/L和(31.9±7.8),均显著高于非EAD组【分别为(45.2±10.7)pg/mL、(642.3±185.6)U/L、(23.7±8.9)μmol/L和(27.0±6.5),P<0.001】;多因素Logistic回归分析显示,术前MELD评分、Child-Pugh分级、血清IL-34和ADR均为影响LT术后发生EAD的独立危险因素(OR>1,P均<0.05);以术前MELD评分、Child-Pugh分级、血清IL-34水平和ADR建立模型,其预测EAD发生的AUC为0.913(95%CI:0.865~0.961),敏感度为88.9%和特异度为85.3%。结论 血清IL-34与ADR联合临床肝功能评分可显著提高预测LT术后发生EAD的准确性,值得临床进一步验证。

关键词: 肝移植, 早期移植物功能障碍, 白细胞介素-34, 丙氨酸氨基转移酶/直接胆红素比值, 终末期肝病模型, 诊断

Abstract: Objective This study aimed to construct and validate a predicting model by combination of serum IL-34 (IL-34), alanine aminotransferase/direct bilirubin ratio (ADR) and model for end -stage liver disease (MELD) score in recipients with liver transplant (LT)for early allograft dysfunction (EAD). Methods A total of 156 patients were encountered in our hospital between January 2020 and December 2024, and all underwent allogeneic liver transplantation (ALT). Serum IL-34 level was assayed by ELISA, routine biochemical parameters were detected, and ADR and MELD score were calculated. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors for EAD occurrence, predicting models were established and predicting performance were evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results By end of seven days after LT, EAD occurred in 27 cases (17.3%) and didn’t in 129 cases (82.7%) in our series; baseline percentage of Child-Pugh class C and MELD score in patients with EAD were much higher than in those without EAD(P<0.05); serum IL-34, ALT, direct bilirumin levels and ADR in patients with EAD were (87.6±15.3)pg/mL, (1865.4±320.8)U/L, (58.3±12.4)μmol/L and(31.9±7.8), all significantly higher than [(45.2±10.7)pg/mL, (642.3±185.6)U/L, (23.7±8.9)μmol/L and (27.0±6.5), respectively, P<0.001] in those without EAD; multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that baseline MELD score, Child-Pugh classification, serum IL-34 level and ADR were all the independent risk factors for EAD occurrence after LT (OR>1,all P<0.05); the AUC was 0.913(95%CI:0.865-0.961), with sensitivity of 88.9% and specificity of 85.3%, when MELD, Child-Pugh classification, serum IL-34 level were combined with ADR to predict EAD happening after LT. Conclusion Combination of serum IL-34 and ADR with liver reservoir index has a promising efficacy in predicting EAD after LT, which warrants further clinical verification.

Key words: Liver transplantation, Early allograft dysfunction, Interleukin-34, Alanine aminotransferase/direct bilirubin ratio, Model for end -stage liver disease, Prediction