实用肝脏病杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (6): 919-922.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2023.06.038

• 胆石症 • 上一篇    下一篇

双镜联合治疗胆囊结石合并肝外胆管结石患者疗效及安全性分析*

古乾权, 陈杰, 邓开   

  1. 400060 重庆市重庆医药高等专科学校附属第一医院普通外科(古乾权,邓开);重庆市丰都县人民医院胃肠外科(陈杰)
  • 收稿日期:2023-06-06 出版日期:2023-11-10 发布日期:2023-11-20
  • 作者简介:古乾权,男,41岁,大学本科,主治医师。E-mail:wy13960936@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    * 2022年度重庆市卫生健康委医学科研项目(编号:2022WSJK044)

Double endoscopic surgery in the treatment of patients with gallbladder stones and extrahepatic bile duct stones

Gu Qianquan, Chen Jie, Deng Kai   

  1. Department of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Medical Pharmaceutical Vocational School, Chongqing 400060, China
  • Received:2023-06-06 Online:2023-11-10 Published:2023-11-20

摘要: 目的 探讨采取双镜联合治疗胆囊结石(GS)合并肝外胆管结石(EBDS)患者的疗效及安全性。方法 2020年1月~2022年12月我院收治的GS合并EBDS患者76例,其中观察组42例接受内镜下逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)治疗,5 d后进行腹腔镜下胆囊切除术(LC)治疗,对照组34例接受传统开腹手术治疗。采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估疼痛程度,采用ELISA法检测血清肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、C反应蛋白(CRP)和皮质醇(Cor)。结果 两组结石清除率均为100.0%,观察组手术时间、术中出血量和术后3 d VAS评分分别为(96.8±7.4)min、(25.7±5.3)ml和(2.8±0.7)分,显著短于或少于对照组【分别为(120.1±9.6)min、(46.0±6.8)ml和(3.5±0.6)分,P<0.05】; 在术后7 d,观察组血清AST和ALT水平分别为(40.5±3.9)U/L和(43.1±4.9)U/L,显著低于对照组【分别为(50.2±5.0)U/L和(56.9±6.0)U/L,P<0.05】;观察组血清TNF-α、IL-6、CRP、Cor和外周血WBC计数分别为(1.5±0.3)ng/L、(10.8±2.0)ng/L、(13.4±2.5)mg/L、(224.7±28.1)mmol/L和(9.8±1.3)×109/L,均显著低于对照组【分别为(2.7±0.5)ng/L、(16.1±2.5)ng/L、(22.0±4.9)mg/L、(262.4±31.8)mmol/L和(12.0±1.5)×109/L,P<0.05】;术后,观察组并发症发生率为7.2%,显著低于对照组的23.5%(P<0.05)。结论 采用双镜联合治疗GS合并EBDS患者能有效改善围术期指标,促进术后恢复,缓解应激反应,减少并发症。

关键词: 胆囊结石, 肝外胆管结石, 内镜下逆行胰胆管造影术, 腹腔镜胆囊切除术, 治疗

Abstract: Objective This study was conducted to investigate double endoscopic surgery in the treatment of patients with gallbladder stones (GS) and extrahepatic bile duct stones (EBDS). Methods 76 patients with GS and EBDS were encountered in our hospital between January 2020 and December 2022, 42 patients in the observation group received laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) five days after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for the removal of common bile duct stones, and 34 patients in the control underwent traditional open surgery. The pain was evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS), and serum tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP) and cortisol (Cor) levels were detected by ELISA. The white blood cell counts (WBC) were detected by full-automatic blood cell analyzer. Results The stone clearance rates in the two groups were both 100.0%; the operation time, intraoperative blood loss and VAS score at day 3 after surgery in the observation were(96.8±7.4)min,(25.7±5.3)ml and (2.8±0.7), significantly shorter or less than [(120.1±9.6)min, (46.0±6.8)ml and (3.5±0.6), respectively, P<0.05] in the control; seven days after operation, serum AST and ALT levels were (40.5±3.9)U/L and (43.1±4.9)U/L, both significantly lower than [(50.2±5.0)U/L and (56.9±6.0)U/L, P<0.05] in the control; serum TNF-α, IL-6, CRP, Cor levels and WBC counts were (1.5±0.3)ng/L, (10.8±2.0)ng/L, (13.4±2.5)mg/L, (224.7±28.1)mmol/L and (9.8±1.3)×109/L, all significantly lower than [(2.7±0.5)ng/L, (16.1±2.5)ng/L, (22.0±4.9)mg/L, (262.4±31.8)mmol/L and (12.0±1.5)×109/L, respectively, P<0.05] in the control; post-operationally, the incidence of complications in the observation group was 7.2%, much lower than 23.5%(P<0.05) in the control. Conclusion The double endoscopic surgery could effectively improve perioperative indexes, promote postoperative recovery, relieve stress response and reduce the complications in patients with GS and EBDS.

Key words: Gallstone stone, Extrahepatic bile duct stone, Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Treatment