实用肝脏病杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (5): 621-624.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2021.05.004

• 肝硬化 • 上一篇    下一篇

应用利伐沙班抗凝治疗经皮血管内介入治疗的布加综合征患者疗效和安全性研究*

李伟之, 李培杰, 马富权, 刘梦莹, 薛挥   

  1. 710061 西安市 西安交通大学第一附属医院消化内科
  • 收稿日期:2021-07-23 发布日期:2021-10-21
  • 通讯作者: 薛挥,E-mail:zj2@mail.xjtu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:李伟之,男,35岁,硕士研究生,主治医师。E-mail:309983251@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    *陕西省科技厅重点研发计划一般项目(编号:2021SF-126)

Rivaroxaban as an oral anticoagulant in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome after percutaneous endovascular intervention

Li Weizhi, Li Peijie, Ma Fuquan, et al   

  1. Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital, Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710061, Shaanxi Province, China
  • Received:2021-07-23 Published:2021-10-21

摘要: 目的 探讨应用利伐沙班作为口服抗凝剂在布加综合征患者接受经皮血管内介入治疗后长期治疗的有效性和安全性。方法 2017年12月~2020年4月我科收治的103例布加氏综合征患者,均接受经皮血管内介入治疗,术后服用利伐沙班抗凝治疗49例,服用阿司匹林54例。术后随访。结果 术后,利伐沙班组和阿司匹林组平均随访时间分别为20.33±6.31个月和19.43±6.34个月(P>0.05),在术后6个月、12个月和20个月,利伐沙班组支架通畅率显著优于阿司匹林组(分别为93.9%对85.2%、89.8%对81.5%和87.8%对74.1%(P=0.044);利伐沙班组和阿司匹林组无大出血率发生率分别为95.9%、91.8%、87.8%和88.9%、87.0%、19.6%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.5);利伐沙班组生存率分别为95.9%、91.8%和85.7%,阿司匹林组分别为94.4%、88.9%和81.5%,差异无统计学意义(P=0.681);利伐沙班组无复合终点发生率分别为95.9%、89.8%和83.7%,阿司匹林组分别为88.9%、87.0%和81.5%,差异无统计学意义(P=0.675)。结论 相对于阿司匹林,在经皮血管内介入治疗布加综合征患者应用利伐沙班抗凝治疗有助于保持支架畅通,不增加大出血等并发症,值得临床进一步研究。

关键词: 布加综合征, 血管内介入治疗, 经颈静脉肝内门体分流术, 利伐沙班, 抗凝治疗

Abstract: Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban as an oral anticoagulant in patients with Budd Chiari syndrome after percutaneous intravascular intervention (PII). Methods The clinical data of 103 patients with Budd Chiari syndrome who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria between December 2017 and April 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent PII, and were divided into two groups, taking rivaroxaban (n=49) or aspirin (n=54) as the anticoagulants after operation. The endpoint was mortality and/or massive bleeding. Results After operation, the average follow-up period in rivaroxaban- and aspirin-treated groups were 20.33±6.31 months and 19.43±6.34 months (P>0.05); at the end of 6 month, 12 month and 20 month, the stent patency rates in the rivaroxaban-treated groups were significantly higher than those in aspirin-treated group, e.g. 93.9% vs. 85.2%, 89.8% vs. 81.5% and 87.8% vs. 74.1%(all P=0.044); there were no significant differences as respect to massive bleeding free rates at 6 month, 12 month and 20 month in the two groups (95.9%, 91.8% and 87.8% vs. 88.9%, 87.0% and 19.6%, P>0.5); the survival rates at 6-month, 12-month and 20-month in rivaroxaban-treated group were 95.9%, 91.8% and 85.7%, not significantly different compared to 94.4%, 88.9% and 81.5% in aspirin-treated group (P=0.681); the endpoint mortality and/or massive bleeding free event in rivaroxaban-treated group were 95.9%, 89.8% and 83.7%, not significantly different compared to 88.9%, 87.0% and 81.5% in aspirin-treated group (P=0.675). Conclusion Compared with aspirin, rivaroxaban could improve stent patency in patients with Budd Chiari syndrome after PII, and might not increase massive bleeding, which is worthy of further clinical investigation.

Key words: Budd-Chiari syndrome, Percutaneous intravascular intervention, Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, Rivaroxaban, Anticoagulants