三种影像学方法诊断肝外胆管结石比较研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2021.03.034

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨采用超声、腹部CT和磁共振胆管成像(MRCP)诊断肝外胆管结石的效能。方法 2017年3月～2019年2月在我院治疗的肝外胆道梗阻性病变患者107例,术前行腹部超声、CT和MRCP检查,以术后病理学检查为金标准,采用ROC曲线分析腹部超声、CT和MRCP诊断肝外胆管结石的效能。结果本组病例经手术后病理学检查,诊断肝外胆管结石59例;超声、CT和MRCP诊断结石分别为64.4%、67.8%和84.7%(P<0.05);对于直径≤8 mm的结石,MRCP的诊断率为80.0%(32/40),显著高于超声诊断的60.0%(24/40)或腹部CT诊断的57.5%(23/40),MRCP对结石的定位准确率为84.8%(50/59),也显著高于超声检查的66.1%(39/59)或腹部CT检查的67.8%(40/59,P<0.05);MRCP诊断的灵敏度、特异度和准确率分别为84.8%(50/59)、89.6%(43/48)和86.9%(93/107),显著高于超声检查【分别为64.4%(38/59)、83.3%(40/48)和72.9%(78/107),P<0.05】或腹部CT检查【分别为67.8%(40/59)、81.3%(39/48)和73.8%(79/107),P<0.05】。结论 MRCP诊断肝外胆管结石的效能较高,优于腹部CT或超声检查,尤其是对直径≤8 mm的小结石,应该引起重视。

关键词: 肝外胆管结石, 磁共振胆管成像, 计算机断层扫描, 超声, 诊断

Abstract: Objective The aim of this study was to explore the diagnostic efficacy of ultrasonography, CT and magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRCP) in the diagnosis of extrahepatic bile duct stones.Methods A total of 107 patients with extrahepatic biliary obstruction were recruited in our hospital between March 2017 and February 2019, and all of them underwent abdominal ultrasonography, CT scan and MRCP. The diagnosis was confirmed by pathological examination. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy by abdominal ultrasound, CT and MRCP for diagnosis of stones were analyzed by ROC curves and the area under the ROC curve (AUC).Results Out of our 107 patients with extrahepatic biliary obstruction, 59 were diagnosed as with extrahepatic bile duct stones by post-operational pathological examination and the diagnostic rates by ultrasonography, CT and MRCP were 64.4%,67.8% and 84.7%(P<0.05); as to the stones less than 8 mm, the diagnostic rate by MRCP was 80.0%(32/40), significantly higher than 60.0%(24/40) by ultrasonography or 57.5%(23/40) by CT scan, and the accuracy of positioning stones by MRCP was 84.8%(50/59), also much higher than 66.1%(39/59) by sonography or 67.8%(40/59, P<0.05) by CT scan; the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy by MRCP were 84.8%(50/59), 89.6%(43/48) and 86.9%(93/107), significantly higher than64.4%(38/59), 83.3%(40/48) and 72.9%(78/107) by sonography (P<0.05) or 67.8%(40/59), 81.3%(39/48) and 73.8%(79/107) by CT scan (P<0.05). Conclusions The diagnostic efficacy of MRCP in detecting extrahepatic bile duct stone is superior to ultrasonography or abdominal CT scan, especially for stones less than 8 mm, which has a very practical roles in clinical practice.

Key words: Extrahepatic bile duct stone, Magnetic resonance cholangiography, Computed tomography, Diagnosis

干艳英, 钟凯, 官燕玲, 李慧敏. 三种影像学方法诊断肝外胆管结石比较研究[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2021, 24(3): 439-442.

Gan Yanying, Zhong Kai, Guan Yanling, et al. Diagnostic efficacy of ultrasonography,CT and MRCP in the diagnosis of extrahepatic bile duct stones[J]. Journal of Practical Hepatology, 2021, 24(3): 439-442.

参考文献

[1] 李国伟, 蔡剑锋, 袁年勇, 等. 腹腔镜超声辅助精准肝切除治疗肝内外胆管结石. 中华肝胆外科杂志, 2019, 25(9):685-688.
[2]Jabeen S, Robbani I, Choh NA, et al. Spectrum of biliary abnormalities inportal cavernoma cholangiopathy (PCC) secondary to idiopathic extrahepatic portal vein obstruction (EHPVO)-a prospective magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography(MRCP) based study. Br J Radiol, 2016, 89(9):1068-1070.
[3] 孙晓东, 邱伟, 吕国悦, 等. 2364例肝外胆管结石三镜联合微创外科治疗的临床疗效. 中华消化外科杂志, 2016, 15(4):357-362.
[4] 中华医学会外科学分会胆道外科学组. 2011中国肝胆管结石病诊断治疗指南. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 2011:15-18.
[5] 成剑, 刘军伟, 孙晓东, 等. 再次B超联合磁共振胆胰管成像检查在胆总管单发结石急性腹痛缓解后的临床应用价值. 中华肝胆外科杂志, 2018, 24(7):464-466.
[6] Miura T, Yoshizawa T, Hirai H, et al. Prognosticimpact of CD163⁺ macrophages in tumor stroma and CD8⁺ t-cells in cancer cell nests in invasive extrahepatic bile duct cancer. Anticancer Res, 2017, 37(1):183-190.
[7] 杨素行, 王屹. 非肿瘤性疾病致梗阻性黄疸的影像学特征及鉴别诊断. 中华消化外科杂志, 2017, 16(8):423-429.
[8] 楼健颖, 陈伟, 王冀, 等. 经皮窦道胆道镜在肝内外胆管残留结石诊断与治疗中的应用价值(附1045例报告). 中华消化外科杂志, 2017, 16(8):856-859.
[9] 闫宏宪, 田建国. 十二指肠乳头旁憩室致复发性胆管结石40例疗效. 中华肝胆外科杂志, 2016, 22(1):30-32.
[10] Hamada Y, Maeshiro K. 2282 clinicopathological analysis of carcinoma of the junction of the extrahepatic bile duct and cystic duct. Eur J Cancer, 2015, 51(3):426.
[11] 李新丰, 王伟, 王高雄, 等. 腹腔镜联合胆道镜体内碎石治疗老年人肝外胆道结石. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2015, 3(3):221.
[12] Yang JF, Jin HB, Gu WG, et al. Diagnosis value of serum MUC3A in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinom. Gastroenterology, 2017, 152(5):296.
[13] Hajjar R, Létourneau A, Henri M, et al. Cholecystocolonic fistula with a giant colonic gallstone: the mainstay of treatment in an acute setting. J Surg Case Rep, 2018,2018(10):rjy278.
[14] Komatsubara T, Oshiro H, Sakuma Y, et al. Overexpression of matriptase in tumor stroma is a poor prognostic indicator of extrahepatic bile duct cancer. Patho Int, 2019, 69(2):86-93.
[15] Tylicka M, Matuszczak E, Karpińska M, et al. Proteasome activity and C-reactive protein concentration in the course of inflammatory reaction in relation to the type of abdominal operation and the surgical technique used. Mediators Inflamm, 2018,2018:2469098.
[16] Tan WF, He JQ, Deng JL, et al. Small molecule metabolite biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma with bile duct tumor thrombus diagnosis. Sci Rep, 2018, 8(1):3309.
[17] Pantiora EV, Sakellaridis EP, Kontis EA, et al. Inflammatory pseudotumor of the liver presented in a patient with cholelithiasis. Cureus, 2018,10(8):e3231.
[18] da Costa AC, Santa-Cruz F, Sena BF, et al. Dedifferentiated liposarcoma of the gallbladder: first reported case. World J Surg Oncol, 2018,16(1):221.
[19] Fahlenkamp UL, Admas LC, Böker SM, et al. Feasibility of gadoxetate disodium enhanced 3D T1 MR cholangiography (MRC) with a specific inversion recovery prepulse for the assessment of the hepatobiliary system. Plos One, 2018, 13(9):e0203476.
[20] Laurent L, Lemaitre C, Minello A, et al. Cholangiopathy in critically ill patients surviving beyond the intensive care period: a multicentre survey in liver units. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2017, 46(11):1070-1076.