实用肝脏病杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (3): 435-438.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2021.03.033

• 胆石症 • 上一篇    下一篇

一步法和分步法治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者疗效及并发症分析

冯浩, 吕海涛, 王子伟, 吴娟   

  1. 073000 河北省定州市人民医院肝胆外科(冯浩,王子伟);
    河北医科大学第二医院肝胆外科(吕海涛);
    定州市职工中等专业学校外科(吴娟)
  • 收稿日期:2020-09-01 出版日期:2021-05-30 发布日期:2021-04-30
  • 通讯作者: 王子伟,E-mail:pangdudu532757865@163.com
  • 作者简介:冯浩,男,39岁,大学本科,副主任医师。E-mail:huitailangfh@163.com

Efficacy of one-step and step-by-steplaparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of patients with gallbladder stones and common bile duct stones

Feng Hao, Lyu Haitao, Wang Ziwei, et al   

  1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, People’s Hospital, Dingzhou 073000, Hebai Province, China
  • Received:2020-09-01 Online:2021-05-30 Published:2021-04-30

摘要: 目的 探讨一步法与分步法手术治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者的疗效。方法 2016年1月~2019年6月我院诊治的胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者152例,其中87例接受一步法手术,即行腹腔镜胆囊切除(LC)和胆总管探查取石(LCBDE)术,65例接受分步法手术,即行内镜逆行胰胆管造影/乳头括约肌切开(ERCP/EST)和LC术,比较两组疗效。结果 一步法组总手术时间为(156.3±42.6)min,术后置管率为98.9%,显著长于或高于分步法组【(124.4±31.4)min和15.4%,P<0.05】,而住院日为(14.4±3.9)d,住院费用为(27.9±7.0)千元,均显著短于或低于分步法组【(18.7±4.2)d和(31.24±5.8)千元,P<0.05】;一步法组手术成功率为95.4%、结石清除率为93.1%,分步法组分别为100.0%和96.9%,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);一步法组术后反流性胆管炎发生率0.0%,显著低于分步法组的7.7%(P<0.05),但两组并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义(19.5%对 32.3%,P>0.05)。结论 一步法和分步法手术均可应用于治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者,但在合适的患者采取一步法手术可能更迅速地解除病痛,疗效好。

关键词: 胆囊结石, 胆总管结石, 腹腔镜胆囊切除术, 腹腔镜胆总管探查, 内镜逆行胰胆管造影, 治疗

Abstract: Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of one-step and step-by-step laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in the treatment of patients with gallbladder stones and common bile duct stones. Methods 152 patients with gallbladder stones and common bile duct stones were admitted to our hospital between January 2016 and June 2019, 87 patients received one-step surgery, e.g., LC and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE), and 65 patients received step-by-step surgery, e.g., endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography/papillary endoscopic sphincterotomy (ERCP/EST) and afterward LC.Results The total surgical time and postoperative catheter placement rate in patients with one-step surgery were (156.3±42.6)min and 98.9%, significantly longer or higher than [(124.4±31.4)min and 15.4%, P<0.05] in patients receiving step-by-step surgery, while the hospital stay and hospitalization cost were (14.4±3.9)d and (27.9±7.0)thousand yuan, significantly shorter or lower than(18.7±4.2)d and(31.24±5.8)thousand yuan (P<0.05) in the latter; there were no statistically significant differences in the surgical success rate and stone clearance rate between the two groups (95.4% vs. 93.1% and 100.0% vs. 96.9%, respectively, P>0.05); the incidence rate of reflux cholangitis in one-step-treated patients was significantly lower than step-by-step surgery-treated patients (0.0% vss 7.7%, P<0.05), while there was no significant difference in the total incidence of complications between the two groups (19.5% vs. 32.1%, P>0.05).Conclusion Both the one-step and step-by-step with patients with gallbladder surgery are efficacious in dealing stones and common bile duct stones, and under some circumstances, the one-step surgery might eradicate the stones rapidly and get a good efficacy.

Key words: Gallbladder stones, Common bile duct stones, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration, Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, Therapy