实用肝脏病杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (4): 617-620.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2026.04.035

• 胆石症 • 上一篇    下一篇

经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆囊结石患者疗效研究*

杨波, 刘兴贵, 孙建洪, 李俊阳, 覃应茂, 刘得元   

  1. 558000 贵州省都匀市 贵州医科大学第三附属医院肝胆外科
  • 收稿日期:2025-11-03 出版日期:2026-07-10 发布日期:2026-07-20
  • 通讯作者: 刘兴贵,E-mail:Lxg13984164506@163.com
  • 作者简介:杨波,男,46岁,大学本科,副主任医师。E-mail:dryangbo711053@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    *贵州省黔南州科技计划项目[编号:黔南科合社字(2024)4号]

Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in treatment of patients with gallbladder stones

Yang Bo, Liu Xinggui, Sun Jianhong, et al   

  1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Third Affiliated Hospital, Guizhou Medical University, Duyun 558000, Guizhou Province, China
  • Received:2025-11-03 Online:2026-07-10 Published:2026-07-20

摘要: 目的 探讨经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)治疗胆囊结石患者的疗效。方法 2023年4月~2025年9月我院收治的94例胆囊结石患者,被随机分成两组,每组47例。在对照组,行三孔LC术,在观察组行经脐单孔LC术。采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估疼痛程度,应用温哥华瘢痕量表评估切口愈合,采用免疫比浊法检测血清C-反应蛋白(CRP)水平。结果 观察组医疗花费为(0.8±0.1)万元,显著低于对照组【(0.9±0.2)万元,P<0.05】;在术后6 h、24 h和72 h,观察组VAS评分分别为(1.7±0.5)分、(1.8±0.6)分和(1.6±0.5)分,均显著低于对照组【分别为(2.2±0.6)分、(2.9±0.8)分和(2.5±0.7)分,P<0.05】;观察组肠鸣音恢复、肛门排气、进食和排便时间分别为(11.7±2.6)h、(13.5±3.5)h、(25.8±6.1)h和(31.1±5.3)h,均显著短于对照组【分别为(15.2±3.4)h、(16.6±4.1)h、(30.1±6.5)h和(46.2±6.4)h,P<0.05】;在术后72 h,观察组血清CRP水平为(20.1±6.2)mg/L,显著低于对照组【(26.7±5.4)mg/L, P<0.05】;在术后1个月评估,观察组切口愈合疤痕色泽、厚度和柔软度评分分别为(0.4±0.1)分、(0.3±0.1)分和(1.1±0.3)分,均显著低于对照组【分别为(0.8±0.2)分、(0.7±0.2)分和(1.8±0.5)分,P<0.05】。结论 采用经脐单孔LC术治疗胆囊结石患者具有一定的医疗优势,但可能操作技术要求较高。

关键词: 胆囊结石, 单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术, 疼痛, 医学美容, 治疗

Abstract: Objective The aim of this study was to investigate transumbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in treatment of patients with gallbladder stones. Methods 94 patients with gallbladder stones were encountered in our hospital between April 2023 and September 2025, and were randomly assigned to receive conventional three-port LC in 47 cases in control, or receive transumbilical single-port LC in another 47 cases in observation group. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores and scar condition were evaluated routinely. Serum C-reactive protein (CRP) level was detected. Results Medical cost in the observation group was (8.0±1.0) thousand yuan, much lower than [(9.0±2.0) thousand yuan, P<0.05]; by 6 h, 24 h and 72 h after operation, VAS scores in the observation were (1.7±0.5), (1.8±0.6) and (1.6±0.5), all much lower than [(2.2±0.6), (2.9±0.8) and (2.5±0.7), respectively, P<0.05] in the control; bowel sound recovery, first flatus, eating and defecation in the observation group were(11.7±2.6)h, (13.5±3.5)h, (25.8±6.1)h and (31.1±5.3)h, all much shorter than [(15.2±3.4)h, (16.6±4.1)h, (30.1±6.5)h and (46.2±6.4)h, respectively, P<0.05] in the control; by 72 h after operation, serum CRP level was (20.1±6.2)mg/L, significantly lower than [(26.7±5.4)mg/L, P<0.05] in the control; by end of one month, scar color, thickness and softness scores were (0.4±0.1), (0.3±0.1) and (1.1±0.3), all much lower than [(0.8±0.2), (0.7±0.2) and (1.8±0.5), respectively, P<0.05] in the control group. Conclusion Transumbilical single-port LC has undoubtedly its own superiority, but the surgical process might be more sophisticated.

Key words: Gallbladder stones, Single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Pain, Medical aesthetics, Therapy