实用肝脏病杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (4): 589-592.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2026.04.028

• 肝癌 • 上一篇    下一篇

载药微球经导管动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝癌患者疗效分析*

许刚, 潘晓琳, 王萍, 张燕, 张涵   

  1. 250031 济南市 解放军联勤保障部队第九六○医院血液科(许刚);核医学科(潘晓琳, 王萍);淄博148医院肿瘤血液科(张燕);山东第一医科大学第一附属医院肿瘤科(张涵)
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-09 出版日期:2026-07-10 发布日期:2026-07-20
  • 通讯作者: 潘晓琳,E-mail:617699814@qq.com
  • 作者简介:许刚,男,46岁,大学本科,主任医师。E-mail:Xugang117a@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    *山东省济南市卫生健康委科技发展计划项目(编号:2024-4-156)

Clinical benefits of drug-loaded microsphere transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in treatment of patients with primary liver cancer

Xu Gang, Pan XiaoLin, Wang Ping, et al   

  1. Department of Hematology, 960th Hospital, Joint Logistics Support Force, Jinan 250031, Shandong Province, China
  • Received:2025-12-09 Online:2026-07-10 Published:2026-07-20

摘要: 目的 探究载药微球经导管动脉化疗栓塞术(D-TACE)与碘化油TACE治疗原发性肝癌(PLC)患者的临床疗效。方法 2022年1月~2024年1月我院收治的PLC患者84例,被随机分为对照组42例和观察组42例,分别行常规TACE或D-TACE治疗。在治疗后3个月,参照mRECIST标准评估疗效,记录客观缓解率(ORR)和疾病控制率(DCR),随访1年,记录无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存时间(OS),绘制Kaplan-Meier曲线评估生存状况。结果 两组ORR(54.8%对50.0%)和DCR(97.6%对90.5%)比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);在治疗后1个月,观察组血清ALT水平为(46.5±8.2)U/L,显著低于对照组【(68.9±11.4)U/L,P<0.05】,而两组血清TBIL和AFP水平差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);在1年随访末,观察组生存率为69.1%,与对照组的59.5%比,差异无统计学意义(x2=0.830,P=0.362);观察组PFS 为(10.9±0.3)个月,与对照组的(9.9±0.4)个月(Log-Rank x2=3.287,P=0.070)比或OS为(11.1±0.3)个月,与对照组的(10.0±0.4)个月(Log-Rank x2=3.397,P=0.065)比,均无统计学意义。结论 采用D-TACE治疗PLC患者可能减轻肝损伤,其治疗疗效的优势还需要观察。

关键词: 原发性肝癌, 经导管动脉化疗栓塞术, 载药微球, 治疗

Abstract: Objective The aim of this study was to explore clinical benefits of drug-loaded microsphere transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (D-TACE) in treatment of patients with primary liver cancer(PLC). Methods 84 patients with PLC were encountered in our hospital between January 2022 and January 2024, and were randomly assigned to underwent D-TACE in 42 cases in observation or underwent conventional TACE in another 42 cases in control. Clinical efficacy was evaluated by mRECIST criteria three months after operation, and objective remission rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were recorded. All patients were followed-up for one year, and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared. Results There were no significant differences as respect to ORR(54.8% vs. 50.0%) or DCR (97.6% vs. 90.5) between the two groups (P>0.05); by end of one-month after treatment, serum ALT level in the observation was (46.5±8.2)U/L, much lower than [(68.9±11.4)U/L, P<0.05] in the control, while there were no significant differences as respect to serum bilirubin and AFP levels between the two groups (P>0.05); one-year survival rate in the observation was 69.1%, not significant different compared to 59.5% in the control (x2=0.830, P=0.362); either PFS (10.9±0.3) mon, or OS(11.1±0.3)mon, both not significant different as compared to (9.9±0.4) mon(Log-Rank x2=3.287, P=0.070) or (10.0±0.4) mon (Log-Rank x2=3.397, P=0.065) in the control group. Conclusion D-TACE could decrease liver injury in treatment of patients with PLC, and the clinical benefits needs long-term observation.

Key words: Hepatoma, Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, Drug-eluting bead, Therapy