实用肝脏病杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (6): 851-854.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2021.06.021

• 肝衰竭 • 上一篇    下一篇

多种预后评分系统预测慢加急性肝衰竭并发真菌感染患者短期预后价值分析*

刘积庆, 于国英, 杨生森, 黄群, 保成兰   

  1. 810000 西宁市 青海省第四人民医院肝病二科(刘积庆,于国英,黄群,保成兰);青海大学附属医院消化内科(杨生森)
  • 收稿日期:2021-01-29 出版日期:2021-11-10 发布日期:2021-11-15
  • 作者简介:刘积庆,男,42岁,大学本科,副主任医师。E-mail:wqm14782@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    *西宁市科学技术研究与发展计划项目(编号:201906A012)

Short-term prognosis of patients with acute on chronic liver failure and invasive fungal infection by four prognostic scoring systems

Liu Jiqing, Yu Guoying, Yang Shengsen, et al   

  1. Second Department of Liver Diseases, Fourth Provincial People's Hospital, Xining 810000, Qinghai Province, China
  • Received:2021-01-29 Online:2021-11-10 Published:2021-11-15

摘要: 目的 探讨应用终末期肝病模型(MELD)、终末期肝病模型联合血清钠模型(MELD-Na+)、亚太肝脏研究协会慢加急性肝衰竭研究小组评分(AARC-ACLF)和慢性肝衰竭-序贯器官衰竭评分(CLIF-SOFA)等4种预后评分系统预测慢加急性肝衰竭(ACLF)并发真菌感染(IFI)患者短期预后的价值。方法 2018年1月~2020年10月我院收治的ACLF并发IFI患者60例,给予内科综合治疗,分别计算MELD、MELD-Na+、AARC-ACLF和CLIF-SOFA评分,应用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)评估4种预后评分系统对患者死亡风险的预测效能。结果 在治疗观察12 w末,本组ACLF并发IFI患者病死率为68.3%;41例死亡组血清总胆红素、凝血酶原时间国际标准化比值、肌酐和乳酸水平分别为(362.9±79.7)μmol/L、(2.3±0.2)、(131.7±21.5)μmol/L和(1.6±0.4)mmol/L,均显著高于生存组【分别为(277.4±63.6)μmol/L、(1.7±0.1)、(102.9±15.3)μmol/L和(1.3±0.3)mmol/L,P<0.05】,而血清白蛋白水平为(29.6±2.2)g/L,显著低于生存组【(31.8±2.7)g/L,P<0.05】;死亡组并发肝性脑病发生率为43.9%,显著高于生存组的10.5%(P<0.05);死亡组MELD评分、MELD-Na+评分、CLIF-SOFA评分和AARC-ACLF评分分别为(29.1±7.3)分、(30.4±7.5)分、(8.7±1.4)分和(9.2±1.1)分,均显著高于生存组【分别为(20.7±4.6)分、(21.9±5.2)分、(6.8±1.0)分和(7.3±0.8)分,P<0.05】;ROC曲线分析发现,分别以MELD评分>22.0分、MELD-Na+评分>23.0分、AARC-ACLF评分>8.0分和CLIF-SOFA评分>8.0分为截断点,预测ACLF并发IFI患者12 w死亡风险高的AUC分别为0.687、0.716、0.893和0.884,提示CLIF-SOFA评分和AARC-ACLF评分预测效能显著优于MELD评分或MELD-Na+评分(P<0.05)。结论 应用AARC-ACLF和CLIF-SOFA评分可预测ACLF并发IFI患者近期病死风险,具有一定的临床实用价值。

关键词: 慢加急性肝衰竭, 真菌感染, 亚太肝脏研究协会慢加急性肝衰竭研究小组评分, 预后

Abstract: Objective The aim of this study was to explore the short-term prognosis of patients with acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF) and invasive fungal infection (IFI) by the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD), MELD-serum sodium (MELD-Na+), APASL-ACLF research consortium score (AARC-ACLF) and chronic liver failure-sequential organ failure assessment (CLIF-SOFA). Methods 60 patients with ACLF and IFI were admitted to our hospital between January 2018 and October 2020, and were given convensional supporting therapy. Thescores of MELD, MELD-Na+, AARC-ACLF and CLIF-SOFA were calculated. The predictive efficacy of the four prognostic scoring systems for death risk in patients with ACLF and IFI was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results At the end of 12 week treatment, the fatality rate in our series was 68.3%; serum bilirubin, INR, creatinine and lactate in 41 dead patients at the peak were (362.9±79.7)μmol/L,(2.3±0.2), (131.7±21.5)μmol/L and (1.6±0.4)mmol/L, all significantly higher than [(277.4±63.6)μmol/L, (1.7±0.1), (102.9±15.3)μmol/L and (1.3±0.3)mmol/L, respectively, P<0.05], while serum albumin level was (29.6±2.2)g/L, significantly lower than [(31.8±2.7)g/L, P<0.05] in the survivals; the incidence of hepatic encephalopathy was 43.9%, much higher than 10.5% (P<0.05) in the survivals; the MELD, MELD-Na+, CLIF-SOFA and AARC-ACLF scores were (29.1±7.3), (30.4±7.5), (8.7±1.4) and (9.2±1.1), all significantly higher than [(20.7±4.6), (21.9±5.2),(6.8±1.0) and (7.3±0.8), respectively, P<0.05] in the survivals; the ROC curves analysis showed that the AUC were 0.687, 0.716, 0.893 and 0.884 by MELD, MELD-Na+, CLIF-SOFA and AARC-ACLF scores, respectively, in predicting the 12-week death of patients with ACLF AND IFI, when the cut-off-value were set 22.0, 23.0, 8.0 and 8.0, suggesting the CLIF-SOFA and AARC-ACLF scoring system were superior to the other two (P<0.05). Conclusion We recommend the AARC-ACLF and CLIF-SOFA scoring system in predicting the short-term fatality in patients with ACLF and IFI.

Key words: Acute on chronic liver failure, Invasive fungal infection, APASL-ACLF research consortium score, Prognosis