实用肝脏病杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (4): 492-495.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2020.04.010

• 病毒性肝炎 • 上一篇    下一篇

CT测量肝外基质体积分数评估慢性乙型肝炎患者肝纤维化临床应用研究*

周莹, 陈娇, 叶龙, 刘启榆, 钟唐力   

  1. 621000 四川省绵阳市中心医院放射科(周莹,陈娇,叶龙,刘启榆);成都医学院第一附属医院放射科(钟唐力)
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-08 发布日期:2020-07-15
  • 通讯作者: 刘启榆,E-mail:lzxi825@126.com
  • 作者简介:周莹,女,35岁,硕士研究生,主治医师
  • 基金资助:
    *四川省科技厅医学科研青年创新课题(编号:Q14034)

Hepatic extracellular volume fractions measured by CT scan as a novel noninvasive marker for significant liver fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection

Zhou Ying, Chen Jiao, Ye Long, et al   

  1. Department of Radiology, Central Hospital, Mianyang 621000,Sichuan Province, China
  • Received:2020-04-08 Published:2020-07-15

摘要: 目的 应用多期动态CT检查测量肝外基质体积分数(fECV)评估慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)患者肝纤维化(HF)程度。 方法 2015年1月~2020年1月我院诊治的CHB患者138例,接受肝活检和CT增强扫描检查,并测定肝外基质体积分数(fECV),绘制受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)并计算曲线下面积(AUC),评估fECV诊断肝纤维化的效能。结果 在本组138例CHB患者中,经组织病理学诊断F0期14例,F1期28例,F2期45例,F3期36,F4期15例,即F0~1组42例,F2~4组96例,F3~4组51例;F0~1组肝实质CT强化值为(24.6±8.8)HU,与F2~4组的(25.2±5.6)HU比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但主动脉CT强化值、fECV和红细胞压积分别为(44.8±9.4)HU、(27.8±4.5)%和(40.8±5.2)%,与F2~4组比,差异显著【分别为(40.6±7.2)HU、(37.5±4.8)%和(37.6±6.2)%,P<0.05】;fECV诊断CHB患者F2~4、F3~4和F4的截断点、AUC及95%CI、敏感度、特异度和准确度分别为30.2%、0.71(0.59~0.84)、65.5%、78.0%和74.5%;34.0%、0.76(0.62~0.89)、75.8%、74.2%和75.0%和36.8%、0.81(0.67~0.96)、90.5%、72.6%和86.8%。结论 采用多期动态CT增强扫描检查测量fECV可以帮助诊断CHB患者HF,值得临床进一步验证。

关键词: 慢性乙型肝炎, 肝纤维化, CT检查, 肝外基质体积分数, 诊断

Abstract: Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the hepatic extracellular volume fractions (fECV) measured by CT scan as a novel noninvasive marker for significant liver fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Methods A total of 138 patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) were recruited in our hospital between January 2015 and January 2020, and all underwent routine multi-stage enhanced liver CT scan and liver biopsies. The fECV were measured. The ROC curve and the area under the curve (AUC) were calculated and the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were obtained. Results Out of our series of 138 patients with CHB, the histopathological examination showed the F0 in 14, F1 in 28, F2 in 45, F3 in 36 and F4 in 15, e.g. F0-1 in 42, F2-4 in 96 and F3-4 in 51; the absolute enhancement of liver parenchyma in patients with F0-1 was(24.6±8.8)HU, not significantly different compared to (25.2±5.6)HU in F2-4 (P>0.05), while the absolute enhancement value of aorta, fECV and hematokrit were (44.8±9.4)HU, (27.8±4.5)% and (40.8±5.2)%, significantly different compared to 【(40.6±7.2)HU,(37.5±4.8)% and (37.6±6.2)%, respectively, P<0.05】 in F2~4 group; the cut-off-value, the AUC (95% CI) , sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of fECV in diagnosing F2-4, F3-4 and F4 in patients with CHB were 30.2%, 0.71(0.59 to 0.84), 65.5%, 78.0% and 74.5%; 34.0%, 0.76(0.62 to 0.89), 75.8%, 74.2% and 75.0%; and 36.8%, 0.81(0.67 to 0.96), 90.5%, 72.6% and 86.8%. Conclusion The measurement of fECV by multi-phase dynamic CT scan might be applied as an effective noninvasive index for the diagnosis of HF in patients with CHB, which needs further investigation.

Key words: Hepatitis B, Hepatic fibrosis, Hepatic extracellular volume fractions, CT scan, Receiver operating characteristic curve, Diagnosis