实用肝脏病杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (2): 225-228.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2026.02.016

• 自身免疫性肝病 • 上一篇    下一篇

老年自身免疫性肝炎患者不完全应答患者临床特征及其影响因素分析*

张小兰, 陈锐, 陈勄, 张羽萍   

  1. 200233 上海市第八人民医院老年医学科(张小兰,陈锐,张羽萍);湖北医药学院附属太和医院综合医学科(陈勄)
  • 收稿日期:2025-10-11 出版日期:2026-03-10 发布日期:2026-03-13
  • 通讯作者: 张羽萍,E-mail:zzyp812@163.com
  • 作者简介:张小兰,女,44岁,医学硕士,副主任医师。E-mail:zhangxiaolanny@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    *上海市科学技术委员会科研计划项目(编号:22140900700)

Clinical feature and risk factors impacting response to immunosuppressive therapy in elderly patients with autoimmune hepatitis

Zhang Xiaolan, Chen Rui, Chen Min, et al   

  1. Department of Geriatrics, Eighth People's Hospital, Shanghai 200233, China
  • Received:2025-10-11 Online:2026-03-10 Published:2026-03-13

摘要: 目的 探讨治疗不完全应答的老年自身免疫性肝炎(AIH)患者临床特征及其影响因素。方法 2023年1月~2025年6月我院诊治的61例AIH患者,均接受标准的免疫抑制剂治疗,观察6个月。使用生物电阻抗分析法测量四肢骨骼肌肌肉质量,使用电子握力计测定左右手握力,诊断肌少症。采用Fried衰弱量表评估衰弱程度,采用免疫散射比浊法检测血清IgG和IgM水平。均接受肝活检。采用多因素Logistic回归分析影响治疗不完全应答的因素。结果 在治疗6个月末,本组AIH患者获得完全应答(CR)47例,不完全应答(NCR)14例;不完全应答组BMI显著低于完全应答组(P<0.05),而存在2型糖尿病、高血压、肌少症占比和衰弱评分均显著高于完全应答组(P<0.05);不完全应答组基线血清ALT、AST、IgG和IgM水平分别为158.2(92.3,243.4)U/L、132.1(85.3,221.5)U/L、(23.6±4.8)g/L和(2.1(1.6,2.5)g/L,均显著高于完全应答组【分别为106.3(71.8,159.1)U/L、95.6(64.1,147.2)U/L、(19.7±3.9)g/L和1.7(1.2,2.1)g/L,P<0.05】;不完全应答组小叶炎评分和胆管损伤评分及脂肪变性、界面性肝炎和肝纤维化发生率均显著大于完全应答组(均P<0.05);多因素Logistic回归分析显示,衰弱评分、肌少症、合并糖尿病、血清IgG水平升高、肝组织胆管损伤和肝纤维化均为影响治疗应答的独立危险因素(P<0.05),而血清ALB水平为保护因素(P<0.05)。结论 老年AIH患者可能对免疫抑制治疗不完全应答,其中合并衰弱、肌少症、血清IgG水平升高和肝组织炎症和纤维化等均可能为影响因素,需要认真研究对策。

关键词: 自身免疫性肝炎, 免疫抑制剂, 应答, 影响因素, 治疗

Abstract: Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical feature and risk factors impacting response to immunosuppressive therapy in elderly patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). Methods 61 elderly patients with AIH were encountered in our hospital between January 2023 and June 2025, and all received immunosuppressive therapy for six months. Patients underwent liver biopsies and serum IgG and IgM levels were detected. Frailty score was assessed and sarcopenia was diagnosed. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent factors impacting response to immunosuppressive therapy. Results By end of six-month treatment, complete response (CR) was obtained in 47 cases, and non-CR (NCR) was found in 14 cases; baseline body mass index in patients with NCR was much lower(P<0.05), while percentages of concomitant diabetes, hypertension and sarcopenia, and frailty score were much higher than in those with CR(P<0.05); baseline serum ALT, AST, IgG and IgM levels were 158.2(92.3, 243.4)U/L, 132.1(85.3, 221.5)U/L, (23.6±4.8)g/L and (2.1(1.6, 2.5)g/L, all much higher than [106.3(71.8, 159.1)U/L, 95.6(64.1, 147.2)U/L, (19.7±3.9)g/L and 1.7(1.2, 2.1)g/L, respectively, P<0.05] in patients with CR; lobular inflammation, bile duct injury, steatosis, interface inflammation and fibrosis were more severe in patients with NCR than in those with CR(all P<0.05); multivariate Logistic regression analysis indicated that frailty score, sarcopenia, diabetes, elevated IgG level, hepatic bile duct injury and fibrosis were all the independent risk factors for poor response to immunosuppressive therapy(P<0.05), while serum albumin level was a protective factor (P<0.05). Conclusion Elderly patients with AIH might not response to immunosuppressive therapy, and the criminal factors should be taken into consideration in dealing with them.

Key words: Autoimmune hepatitis, Immunosuppressive therapy, Response, Risk factors, Therapy