实用肝脏病杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (5): 685-688.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2024.05.010

• 病毒性肝炎 • 上一篇    下一篇

索非布韦联合雷迪帕韦治疗慢性丙型肝炎患者疗效评价*

黎防, 杨宏飞, 张青   

  1. 223000 江苏省淮安市第四人民医院肝病科(黎防,张青);东南大学中大医院江北院区心血管内科(杨宏飞)
  • 收稿日期:2024-02-20 出版日期:2024-09-10 发布日期:2024-09-09
  • 通讯作者: 张青,E-mail:15152361682@163.com
  • 作者简介:黎防,男,34岁,大学本科,主治医师。E-mail:18305237840@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    *江苏省自然科学基金青年基金资助项目(编号:SBK2020040678)

Virological response of patients with chronic hepatitis C to sofebuvir and redipavir combination regimen treatment

Li Fang, Yang Hongfei, Zhang Qing   

  1. Department of Liver disease, Fourth People's Hospital, Huai'an 223000, Jiangsu Province, China
  • Received:2024-02-20 Online:2024-09-10 Published:2024-09-09

摘要: 目的 探讨索非布韦联合雷迪帕韦治疗慢性丙型肝炎(CHC)患者的疗效和安全性。 方法 2017年2月~2023年3月我院诊治的CHC患者48例,被随机分为观察组24例,给予索非布韦联合雷迪帕韦治疗12 w,和对照组24例,给予聚乙二醇干扰素-α联合利巴韦林治疗24 w。评估快速病毒学应答(RVR)、治疗结束时病毒学应答(ETVR)和持续病毒学应答(SVR)。 结果 观察组RVR、ETVR和SVR分别为75.0%、95.8%和95.8%,均显著高于对照组的58.3%、70.8%和66.7% (P<0.05);在治疗结束时,观察组外周血PLT和WBC计数分别为(201.5±22.3)×109/L和(6.5±1.4)×109/L,均显著大于对照组【分别为(137.6±15.0)×109/L和(3.7±1.3)×109/L,P<0.05】,血清ALT水平为(36.2±4.3)U/L,显著低于对照组【(60.8±5.4)U/L,P<0.05】; 在治疗过程中,干扰素-α治疗组出现发热20例(83.3%)、粒细胞减少15例(62.5%)和PLT减少10例(41.7%)。 结论 应用索非布韦联合雷迪帕韦治疗CHC患者疗效好,不良反应少,值得扩大应用,而尽可能减少α-干扰素类继续治疗CHC患者。

关键词: 慢性丙型肝炎, 索非布韦, 雷迪帕韦, 治疗

Abstract: Objective This clinical trial was conducted to investigate efficacy and safety of sofebuvir and redipavir combination in the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC). Methods Forty-eight patients with CHC were enrolled in our hospital between February 2017 and March 2023, and were randomly divided into observation (n=24) and control group (n=24), receiving sofebuvir and redipavir combination for 12 weeks or peginterferon-α and ribavirin combination for 24 weeks, respectively. Rapid virological response (RVR), end of treatment (EOT) virological response (ETVR) and sustained virological response (SVR) were recorded. Results The clinical materials including HCV genotypes at baseline in the two groups were comparable (P>0.05); RVR, ETVR and SVR in the DAA-treated patients were 75.0%, 95.8% and 95.8%, all much higher than 58.3%, 70.8% and 66.7% (P<0.05) in peginterferon-α-treated patients; by end of antiviral treatment, platelet and white blood cell counts in DAA-treated patients were (201.5±22.3)×109/L and (6.5±1.4)×109/L, both significantly higher than [(137.6±15.0)×109/L and (3.7±1.3)×109/L, P<0.05], while serum ALT level was (36.2±4.3)U/L, much lower than [(60.8±5.4)U/L, P<0.05] in peginterferon-α-treated patients; during antiviral treatment, adverse events rates, such as fever occurred in 83.3%, granulocytopenia in 62.5% and thrombocytopenia in 41.7% in peginterferon-α-treated patients. Conclusion Sofebuvir and redipavir combination therapy in treatment of patients with CHC has a satisfactory efficacy and relatively less adverse events, which warrants widespread clinical application.

Key words: Hepatitis C, Sofeibuvir, Radipavir, Therapy