实用肝脏病杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (3): 426-429.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2024.03.027

• 肝癌 • 上一篇    下一篇

肝脏占位病变患者增强MRI胆道系统图像质量最佳翻转角探讨*

景红, 历媛, 孙小伶, 王丹   

  1. 221009 江苏省徐州市 徐州医科大学附属医院医学影像科
  • 收稿日期:2023-09-28 出版日期:2024-05-10 发布日期:2024-06-11
  • 通讯作者: 孙小伶,E-mail:jh15205215280@163.com
  • 作者简介:景红,女,34岁,大学本科,主管技师。E-mail:jh15205215280@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    * 江苏省自然科学基金资助项目(编号:BK20191153)

Optimal flip angle for image quality of biliary system under Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI in patients with space-occupying lesions

Jing Hong, Li Yuan, Sun Xiaoling, et al   

  1. Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou 221009, Jiangsu Province, China
  • Received:2023-09-28 Online:2024-05-10 Published:2024-06-11

摘要: 目的 探讨肝脏占位病变患者增强磁共振成像(MRI)胆道系统图像质量的最佳翻转角(FA)。 方法 2019年7月~2023年7月我院收治的肝脏占位病变患者60例,使用飞利浦Ingenia 3.0扫描仪行钊塞酸二钠(Gd-EOB-DTPA)增强扫描,设置翻转角分别为9°、20°、30°、45°和60°。评估不同翻转角状态下胆道系统胆道显影、伪影、信噪比和对比噪声比的差异。 结果 在FA=45°和60°时,胆道显影评分分别为(3.4±0.9)和(3.6±1.0),均显著高于9°、20°和30°时【分别为(2.7±0.5)、(2.9±0.8)和(3.2±0.8),P<0.05】,随着翻转角的增大,胆道显影评分越来越高,即图像质量越来越好;在胆道系统客观评价方面,各FA时胆囊、肝总管、胆总管信噪比比较差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05);当FA=30°、45°和60°时,胆囊、左肝管、右肝管、肝总管和胆总管信噪比均显著高于 FA=9°时(P<0.05);当FA=45°时,胆囊、右肝管、肝总管平均信噪比最佳,而FA=30°时左肝管和胆总管平均信噪比最佳;各FA时胆囊、肝总管、胆总管对比信噪比比较差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05);当FA=30°、45°和60°时,胆囊、左肝管、右肝管、肝总管和胆总管对比信噪比均显著高于 FA=9°时(P<0.05);当FA=45°时,胆囊、右肝管、肝总管和胆总管平均对比信噪比最佳,而FA=30°时左肝管平均对比信噪比最佳。 结论 在3T延迟成像方面,GdEOB-DTPA增强扫描肝胆管T1加权成像的最佳FA为45°,这一发现可作为临床胆道MR成像的参数设置依据,以提高胆道系统成像质量。

关键词: 肝占位性病变, 磁共振成像, 胆道系统, 翻转角, 图像质量

Abstract: Objective The study was conducted to investigate the optimal flip angle (FA) for image quality of the biliary system under disodium zocerate (Gd-EOB-DTPA) enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with space-occupying lesions (SOL). Methods Sixty patients with SOL were admitted to our hospital between July 2019 and July 2023, and all underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI by using a Philips Elition 3.0 scanner with five different sets of FA at 9°, 20°, 30°, 45° and 60°. The bile duct, artifacts, signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio of the biliary system with different FA were compared. Results At FA=45° and 60°, the estimated scores of cholangiography were (3.4±0.9) and (3.6±1.0), both significantly higher than at 9°, 20° and 30° [(2.7±0.5), (2.9±0.8) and (3.2±0.8), respectively, P<0.05], suggesting with the increase of FA, the score of biliary duct imaging were getting greater and greater, that is, the image quality was getting better and better; as respect to the Objective evaluation of biliary system, the differences of signal-to-noise ratio of gallbladder, common hepatic duct and common bile duct at each FA were statistically significant (P<0.05); at FA=30°, 45° and 60°, the signal-to-noise ratios of gallbladder, left hepatic duct, right hepatic duct, common hepatic duct and common bile duct were significantly higher than those at FA = 9° (P<0.05); the average signal-to-noise ratio of gallbladder, right hepatic duct and common hepatic duct were the best at FA = 45°, while the average signal-to-noise ratio of left hepatic duct and common bile duct was the best at FA = 30°; there were statistically significant differences in the signal-to-noise ratio of gallbladder, common hepatic duct and common bile duct at different FA (P<0.05); at FA=30°, 45° and 60°, the signal-to-noise ratio of gallbladder, left hepatic duct, right hepatic duct, common hepatic duct and common bile duct were significantly higher than that at FA=9° (P < 0.05); in addition, the average contrast signal-to-noise ratio of gallbladder, right hepatic duct, common hepatic duct and common bile duct were the best at FA=45°, while the average contrast signal-to-noise ratio of left hepatic duct was the best at FA=30°. Conclusions In 3T delayed imaging, the optimal FA of GdEOB-DTPA enhanced T1 weighted imaging of the liver and bile duct is 45 °, which could be used as a parameter setting basis for MR biliary imaging to improve the imaging quality.

Key words: Liver space-occupying lesions, Disodium zocerate, Magnetic resonance imaging, Biliary system, Flip angle