实用肝脏病杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (4): 540-543.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2021.04.022

• 肝硬化 • 上一篇    下一篇

超声检查门静脉海绵样变特征表现

殷志勇, 王连双, 张瑶   

  1. 100015 北京市 首都医科大学附属北京地坛医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2020-08-18 发布日期:2021-07-13
  • 通讯作者: 张瑶,E-mail: zgzsy007@163.com
  • 作者简介:殷志勇,男,38岁,大学本科,主治医师。主要从事腹部和心脏超声诊断研究。E-mail: yinzhiyong8111@sina.com

Ultrasonographic features of cavernous transformation of the portal vein in patients with chronic liver diseases

Yin Zhiyong, Wang Lianshuang, Zhang Yao   

  1. Department of Ultrasound, Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100015
  • Received:2020-08-18 Published:2021-07-13

摘要: 目的 探讨门静脉海绵样变(CTPV)及其相关并发症的超声表现特征,并分析了超声漏诊的原因。方法 2017年6月~2020年6月首都医科大学附属北京地坛医院诊治的101例CTPV患者,经CT和MRI增强扫描诊断,接受腹部超声检查。总结CTPV及其相关并发症超声图像表现特征,并分析超声漏诊的原因,提出解决策略。结果 在本组101例CTPV患者中,超声诊断82例(82.2%),漏诊19例(17.8%);在超声诊断病例中,82例(100.0%)患者门静脉主干及其分支周围出现广泛或局部蜂窝状粗细不等的血管结构,70例(85.4%)出现门静脉管壁增厚,76例(92.7%)在迂曲扩张的蜂窝状血管结构内部呈红蓝相间的丰富的血流信号,脉冲多普勒测得门静脉样低速血流频谱,10例(12.2%)门脉周围迂曲扩张蜂窝状血管压迫胆管,导致胆管扩张,8例(9.6%)出现胆囊增大,6例(7.4%)出现胆囊结石,5例(6.1%)出现胆管结石,5例(6.1%)出现门体分流。结论 超声是诊断CTPV的首选影像学方法,超声漏诊的原因主要为海绵样变血管腔细、病变范围小,腹部胀气,假性胆管肿瘤征,肋间隙或胸骨下角窄。利用腹腔积液和胆囊等声窗扫查肝脏,采用超声造影技术或结合其他影像学技术检查可减少漏诊。

关键词: 门静脉海绵样变, 超声, 诊断

Abstract: Objective The aim of this study was to investigate summarize the ultrasonographic features of cavernous transformation of the portal vein (CTPV) in patients with chronic liver diseases (CLD). Methods Abdominal ultrasonography was conducted in 101 patients with CLD, who was diagnosed with CTPV by CT or MRI in Beijing Ditan Hospital affiliated to Capital Medical University between June 2017 and June 2020. The ultrasonic image features of CTPV and its related complications were summarized, and the causes of ultrasonic missed diagnosis were analyzed with the solutions proposed. Results Out of the 101 patients with CTPV proven by CT and/or MRI, the ultrasonic diagnosis was correct in 82 cases (82.2%), with 19 cases (17.8%) missed; among the cases correctly diagnosed by ultrasonography, 82 patients (100.0%) showed extensive or local cellular vascular structures around the portal vein trunk and its branches, the wall of portal vein was thickened in 70 cases (85.4%), the tortuously dilated cellular vascular structure showed red and blue interlaced rich blood flow signals in 76 patients (92.7%), the low-speed blood flow spectrum of portal vein was measured by pulse Doppler, the tortuously dilated honeycomb vessels around the portal vein compressed the bile duct, resulting in bile duct dilatation in ten cases (12.2%), the gallbladder enlargement occurred in 8 patients (9.6%), the cholecystolithiasis was present in 6 patients (7.4%), the bile duct stones were found in 5 cases (6.1%) and the portal shunt occurred in 5 cases (6.1%). Conclusion Ultrasonography is an important imaging method for the diagnosis of cavernous transformation of portal vein. The main reasons for ultrasonic missed diagnosis are small vascular lumen, small lesion scope, abdominal distension, pseudotumor of bile duct, narrow intercostal space and substernal angle. The enhanced CT or MRI examinations need to perform for correct diagnosis. The liver is scanned at acoustic windows of abdominal effusion or gallbladder and the contrast-enhanced ultrasonography might help reduce the missed diagnosis.

Key words: Cavernous transformation of portal vein, Utrasonography, Diagnosis