实用肝脏病杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (1): 137-140.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2019.01.036

• 胆石症 • 上一篇    下一篇

经腹腔顺行放置鼻胆管引流联合胆总管一期缝合在胆总管结石治疗中的应用*

林建寿, 赵思娟, 陈荣吉, 王新栋, 樊海宁   

  1. 810001 西宁市 青海省交通医院普通外科(林建寿,陈荣吉,王新栋); 麻醉科(赵思娟); 青海大学附属医院肝胆胰外科(樊海宁)
  • 收稿日期:2018-07-27 出版日期:2019-01-10 发布日期:2019-01-16
  • 作者简介:林建寿,男,45岁,大学本科,副主任医师。E-mail:fljuye@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    *青海省自然科学基金资助项目(编号:3688235)

Application of anterograde nasobiliary drainage combined with primary suture of common bile duct in the treatment of patients with choledocholithiasis

Lin Jianshou, Zhao Sijuan, Chen Rongji, et al.   

  1. Department of General Surgery,Traffic Hospital,Xining 810001,Qinghai Province,China
  • Received:2018-07-27 Online:2019-01-10 Published:2019-01-16

摘要: 目的 探讨经腹腔顺行放置鼻胆管引流联合胆总管一期缝合在胆总管结石治疗中的应用价值。方法 2014年3月~2017年3月我科收治的164例胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者,采用随机数字表法将患者分成观察组82例和对照组82例。两组均采用腹腔镜胆囊切除术,然后行胆总管探查。在观察组,行腹腔顺行放置鼻胆管引流联合胆总管一期缝合,在对照组行放置T管引流,观察两组患者术中出血量、手术时间、肠功能恢复时间等相关临床指标,比较两组患者胆汁漏、肠道出血、胰腺炎等并发症发生情况。结果 观察组患者术中出血量为(36.1±10.2)mL,与对照组[(32.2±13.2)mL,P>0.05]比,差异无统计学意义;手术时间为(96.6±21.5) min,与对照组[(91.5±19.1) min,P>0.05]比,差异也无统计学意义;肠功能恢复时间为(1.4±0.5) d,显著短于对照组[(2.3±0.5)d,P<0.05];引流管放置时间为(5.5±1.6) d,显著短于对照组[(90.8±2.3) d,P<0.05];住院时间为(7.4±1.4) d,显著短于对照组[(9.5±2.4)d,P<0.05],但住院费用为(38822.2±4019.7)元,显著高于对照组[(26744.5±3277.7)元,P<0.05];术后1 d,观察组患者胆汁引流量为(267.3±102.8)mL,与对照组[(266.5±112.6)mL,P>0.05]比,差异无统计学意义;术后2 d,胆汁引流量为(221.3±128.2)mL,显著少于对照组[(313.3±117.6)mL,P<0.05];术后3 d,胆汁引流量为(191.9±138.5)mL,显著少于对照组[(270.8±121.8) mL,P<0.05];两组引流失败、胆汁漏、肠道出血和胰腺炎等并发症发生率比较,无显著差异(8.4%对12.2%,P>0.05)。结论 采用腹腔顺行放置鼻胆管引流联合胆总管一期缝合治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者具有较好的临床应用价值,显著缩短了带管和住院时间,但需掌握好手术适应证。

关键词: 胆总管结石, 胆囊结石, 经腹腔顺行放置鼻胆管引流, 胆总管一期缝合, 治疗

Abstract: Objective To explore the application value of nasobiliary drainage combined with primary suture of common bile duct in the treatment of patients with choledocholithiasis. Methods 164 patients with cholecystolithiasis and cholelithiasis were recruited in our hospital between March 2014 and March 2017,and were randomly divided into observation group (n=82) and control group (n=82). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and bile duct exploration were performed in both groups. The patients in the observation group were treated with intraperitoneal anterograde nasobiliary drainage combined with primary suture of common bile duct,and the patients in the control group were treated with T tube drainage. The amount of blood loss during operation and the operation time were observed in both groups. The recovery of intestinal functions,bile drainage and the complications were compared between the two groups. Results The amount of intraoperative bleeding in the observation group was (36.1±10.2) mL,similar to [(32.2±13.2) mL,P>0.05] in the control;the operative time was (96.6±21.5) min,also similar to[(91.5±19.1) min,P>0.05] in the control;the recovery time of intestinal function was(1.4±0.5) days,significantly shorter than(2.3±0.5) d(P<0.05) in the control;the time of drainage tube placement was (5.5±1.6) days,significantly shorter than (90.8±2.3) d (P<0.05) in the control;the hospitalization stay was (7.4±1.4) days,significantly shorter than (9.5±2.4) days (P<0.05) in the control,while the hospitalization cost was(38822.2±4019.7) yuan,significantly higher than(26744.7±3277.7) yuan in the control group;at day one postoperation the bile drainage in observation group was(267.3±102.8) mL,not significantly different as compared to (266.5±112.6) mL in the control (P>0.05);at day 2 the bile drainage was (221.3±128.2) mL,significantly lower than (313.3±117.6) mL in the control (P<0.05) and at day 3 the bile drainage was(191.9±138.5) mL,significantly lower than (270.8 ±121.8) mL in the control(P<0.05);the incidences of complications,such as bile leakage,intestinal hemorrhage,nausea and vomiting,and pancreatitis,in the two groups were not significantly different(8.4% vs. 12.2%,x2=0.591,P>0.05). Conclusion The application of intraperitoneal anterograde nasobiliary drainage combined with primary suture of common bile duct in the treatment of patients with choledocholithiasis and cholelithiasis is efficient,which might significantly shorten the hospital stay and tube drainage.

Key words: Cholelithiasis, Choledocholithiasis, Nasobiliary drainage, Primary suture of common bile duct, Therapy