实用肝脏病杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (2): 233-236.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2018.02.019

• 非酒精性脂肪性肝病 • 上一篇    下一篇

门冬氨酸鸟氨酸治疗脂肪肝疗效Meta分析

张志华, 顾天翊, 陈柳莹, 陆伦根   

  1. 200080 上海市 上海交通大学附属第一人民医院消化科
  • 收稿日期:2017-08-25 出版日期:2018-03-10 发布日期:2018-03-19
  • 通讯作者: 陆伦根,E-mail:lungenlu1965@163.com
  • 作者简介:张志华,女,42岁,副主任医师。主要从事消化内科临床工作,现工作在青海西宁富康医院消化科。E-mail:zhangzhihuayy@163.com

Meta analysis of efficacy of ornithine aspartate in the treatment of patients with fatty liver

Zhang Zhihua, Gu Tianyi, Chen Liuying, et al   

  1. Department of Gastroenterology,Jiaotong University School of Medicine,Shanghai 200080,China
  • Received:2017-08-25 Online:2018-03-10 Published:2018-03-19

摘要: 目的 评价门冬氨酸鸟氨酸治疗脂肪肝患者的疗效。 方法 检索中国知网(CNKI)、万方、维普、PubMed、EMBASE、Medline和Cochrane library自建库至2017年7月20日发表的门冬氨酸鸟氨酸治疗脂肪肝患者的临床随机对照试验,应用Cochrane 手册进行风险偏倚评价,采用Jadad 7分量表进行文献质量评分。应用RevMan5.3进行Meta分析。 结果 纳入符合要求的9篇中文文献,共计727例脂肪肝患者。Meta分析结果显示,门冬氨酸鸟氨酸治疗脂肪肝患者临床总有效率显著高于常规对照组【OR=3.71,95%CI(1.85,7.46),P=0.0002】; 降低总胆固醇合并效应值MD=-3.04,95%CI-3(.76,-2.31),P<0.0000,降低甘油三酯(TG)合并效应值MD=-1.60,95%CI(-2.55,-0.65),P=0.0009;降低血清ALT合并效应值MD=-34.04,95%CI(-61.73,-6.35),P=0.02;降低AST合并效应值MD=-9.48,95%CI(-24.66,5.70),P=0.22;相比异甘草酸镁治疗, 门冬氨酸鸟氨酸治疗脂肪肝患者的临床总有效率显著升高 【OR=4.06,95%CI(1.91,8.65),P=0.0003】。 结论 门冬氨酸鸟氨酸治疗脂肪肝患者具有较好的治疗效果,可以改善肝功能指标,降低血脂水平。门冬氨酸鸟氨酸治疗脂肪肝患者的疗效尚需更多设计良好的临床试验证实。

关键词: 脂肪肝, 门冬氨酸鸟氨酸, 疗效, Meta分析

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the efficacy of ornithine aspartate in the treatment of patients with fatty liver. Methods According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria,China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI),Wanfang database,PubMed,EMBASE and Cochrane library up to July 20,2017 were screened for randomized controlled trial of ornithine aspartate in the treatment of patients with fatty liver. The Cochrane handbook was used to assess the risk bias,and the Jadad 7 subscales was used to document the quality score. Meta analysis by using RevMan 5.3 was made. Results A total of 727 Chinese patients with fatty liver were enrolled in the 9 Chinese clinical trials. The results of Meta analysis showed that total clinical efficiency rate in L-ornithine-L-aspartate treatment was much higher as compared to that in the control[OR=3.71,95%CI(1.85,7.46),P=0.0002];the decreased serum total cholesterol level was[MD=-3.04,95%CI(-3.76,-2.31),P<0.00001],and the decreased serum triglyceride level was[MD=-1.60,95%CI(-2.55,-0.65),P=0.0009]; the total effective rate in L-ornithine-L-aspartate treatment was[OR=11.99,95%CI(2.36,60.91),P=0.003];the decreased serum ALT was [MD=-34.04,95%CI(-61.73,-6.35),P=0.02], and the decreased serum AST level was[MD=-9.48, 95%CI(-24.66,5.70),P=0.22];the decrease total serum bilirubin was[MD=-14.92,95%CI(-20.70,-9.15),P<0.00001]. Conclusion The application of L-ornithine-L-aspartate in the treatment of patients with fatty liver has a better therapeutic effect,which might improve the indexes of liver function and blood lipids. The efficacy of L-ornithine L-aspartate in the treatment of patients with fatty liver needs to be confirmed by multi-center,well-designed randomized clinical trials in the future.

Key words: Fatty liver diseases, L-ornithine-L- aspartate, Efficacy, Meta analysis