实用肝脏病杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (1): 57-60.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2019.01.016

• 病毒性肝炎 • 上一篇    下一篇

聚乙二醇化干扰素-α对不同基因型慢性丙型肝炎患者治疗效果比较*

赵鹏, 王磊   

  1. 433100 湖北省潜江市 长江大学附属潜江市中心医院感染病科
  • 收稿日期:2018-06-01 出版日期:2019-01-10 发布日期:2019-01-16
  • 作者简介:赵鹏,男,39岁,大学本科,主治医师。E-mail: 981754602@qq.comresponse
  • 基金资助:
    *湖北省自然科学基金资助项目(编号:233521)

Comparison of therapeutic efficacy of pegylated interferon-α in treatment of patients with different hepatitis C viral genotype infection

Zhao Peng, Wang Lei.   

  1. Department of Infectious Diseases,Central Hospital,Yangtze University,Qianjiang 433100,Hubei Province,China
  • Received:2018-06-01 Online:2019-01-10 Published:2019-01-16

摘要: 目的 观察应用聚乙二醇化干扰素-α(peg-IFNα)治疗丙性肝炎病毒(HCV)基因I型和非HCV I型感染的慢性丙型肝炎(CHC)患者的疗效差异。方法 2013年10月~2016年10月在我院治疗的108例CHC患者,其中HCV I型感染者58例,非HCV I型感染者50例,均接受peg-IFNα-2a联合利巴韦林治疗48周,停药后随访24周。采用荧光定量RT-PCR法检测血清HCV RNA,采用一步法聚合酶链式反应结合TaqMan技术和HCV分型特异性引物进行HCV基因分型。结果 治疗前,两组基线年龄、性别比例、体质指数(BMI)、血清ALT和HCV RNA水平比较,无显著性差异(P>0.05);非HCV I型感染者快速病毒学应答(RVR)、早期病毒学应答(EVR)、治疗结束时病毒学应答(ETVR)和持续病毒学应答率(SVR)分别为74.0%、82.0%、88.0%和86.0%,均显著高于HCV I型感染者(分别为51.7%、60.3%、63.8%和58.6%,P<0.05);67例获得RVR患者SVR发生率为100.00%,显著高于41例未获得RVR患者的25.6%(P<0.05),76例获得EVR患者SVR发生率为94.7%,也显著高于32例未获得EVR患者的15.6%(P<0.05);在血清HCV RNA≤4×105 IU/ml被认为系低病毒载量组,HCV I型与非HCV I型感染者各病毒学应答率无显著性相差(P>0.05),而在血清HCV RNA>4×105 IU/ml被认为系高病毒载量组,39例非HCV I型感染者RVR、EVR、ETVR和SVR分别为71.8%、79.5%、87.2%和84.6%,均显著高于44例HCV I型感染者(分别为50.0%、59.1%、63.6%和74.4%,P<0.05);治疗24周、48周和随访24周时,非HCV I型感染者生化学应答率分别为70.0%、80.0%和84.0%,显著高于HCV I型感染者的50.0%、60.3%和69.0%(P<0.05)。结论 聚乙二醇化干扰素-α联合利巴韦林治疗非HCV I型CHC患者效果较好,获得RVR和EVR的患者将获得SVR,应坚定治疗,而对HCV I型感染者、血清病毒载量较高和未获得RVR和EVR的患者,则应今早作出更改治疗方案的选择。

关键词: 慢性丙性肝炎, HCV 基因型, 聚乙二醇化干扰素-α, 利巴韦林, 疗效

Abstract: Objective To compare the therapeutic efficacy of pegylated interferon-α (peg-IFN-α) in treatment of patients with different hepatitis C viral genotype infection. Methods 108 patients with chronic hepatitis C(CHC),including 58 with hepatitis C virus(HCV) genotype one,and 50 with non-genotype one infection,were recruited in our hospital between October 2013 and October 2016,and all patients were treated with combination of peg-IFN-α and ribavirin for 48 weeks. All patients were followed-up for 24 weeks. The virological and biochemical responses were compared between the two groups. Results At baseline,the age,gender,body mass index,serum ALT and HCV RNA levels in the two groups were not significantly different(P>0.05);the rapid virological response(RVR),early virological (EVR),end treatment virological response (ETVR) and sustained virological response rates in patients with non-genotype one infection were 74.0%,82.0%,88.0% and 86.0%,all significantly higher than 51.7%,60.3%,63.8% and 58.6%,P<0.05) in patients with HCV genotype one infection;the SVR in 67 patients having RVR was 100.00%,much higher than 25.6% (P<0.05) in 41 patients without,and the SVR in 76 patients having EVR was 94.7%,also much higher than 15.6% (P<0.05) in 32 patients without;in patients with serum HCV RNA levels less than or equal to 4×105 IU/ml,the virologic response rates in patients with HCV genotype I or non-genotype I infection were not significantly different(P>0.05),while in those with serum HCV RNA greater than 4×105 IU/ml, the RVR,EVR,ETVR and SVR in 39 patients with non-genotype I infection were 71.8%,79.5%,87.2% and 84.6%,significantly higher than 50.0%,59.1%,63.6% and 74.4% (P<0.05) in 44 patients with HCV genotype I infection;at the end of 24 week,48 week of the treatment and 24 week of follow-up,the biochemical responses rates in patients with non-genotype I infection were 70.0%,80.0% and 84.0%,all significantly higher than 50.0%,60.3% and 69.0%(P<0.05). Conclusion The standard combination of peg-interferon-α and ribavirin is effective in the treatment of patient with non-HCV type I infection,and an alternative therapy should be considered in patients with HCV type I infection,not getting RVR and EVR,and with high serum HCV loads.

Key words: Hepatitis C, HCV genotypes, Pegylated interferon-α, Ribavirin, Therapy