实用肝脏病杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (2): 212-215.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2018.02.014

• 病毒性肝炎 • 上一篇    下一篇

恩替卡韦联合硫普罗宁治疗慢性乙型肝炎患者肝功能及其肝纤维化指标的变化

翁艳   

  1. 100028 北京市 煤炭总医院消化内科
  • 收稿日期:2017-03-20 出版日期:2018-03-10 发布日期:2018-03-19
  • 作者简介:翁艳,女,44岁,大学本科,主治医师。E-mail: wengyan3111@163.com

Clinical efficacy of tiopronin combined with entecavir in the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B

Weng Yan   

  1. Department of Gastroenterology,Coal General Hospital,Beijing 100028,China
  • Received:2017-03-20 Online:2018-03-10 Published:2018-03-19

摘要: 目的 探索硫普罗宁联合恩替卡韦治疗慢性乙型肝炎患者肝功能和肝纤维化指标的变化。 方法 2015年6月~2016年6月我院消化科收治的慢性乙型肝炎患者116例,采用随机数字表法将其分为观察组58例和对照组58例。两组患者均给予口服恩替卡韦治疗,在此基础上,给予观察组口服琉普罗宁治疗,观察12 w。使用普朗牌全自动生化分析仪检测肝功能指标,采用ELISA法检测血清HBV标记物,常规检测血清肝纤维化指标和HBV DNA。 结果 在治疗3 m末,观察组患者血清ALT水平为(41.2±11.7) U/L,显著低于对照组【(49.7±12.4) U/L,P<0.01】,AST水平为(37.2±25.2)U/L,显著低于对照组【(51.3±30.2) U/L,P<0.01】,ALB水平为(35.2±2.5) g/L,与对照组【(35.1±2.7) g/L,P>0.01】比,无显著性差异,TBIL水平为(28.2±6.5)μmol/L,显著低于对照组【(36.5±6.8)μmol/L,P<0.01】;血清HA水平为(93.9±34.2) mg /L,显著低于对照组【(116.5±35.1) mg/L,P<0.01】,LN水平为(103.6±38.2) mg/L,显著低于对照组【(127.9±40.5) mg/L,P<0.01】,C-IV水平为(105.2±40.3) mg/L,显著低于对照组【(133.8±35.1) mg/L,P<0.01】,PCIII水平为(75.3±16.7) mg/L,显著低于对照组【(91.2±18.5) mg/L,P<0.01】;血清HBV DNA转阴率为60.3%,与对照组【60.3%,P>0.05】比,差异无统计学意义,两组均无血清HBsAg转阴或HBeAg转阴;两组均无严重不良反应发生。 结论 硫普罗宁联合恩替卡韦治疗慢性乙型肝炎患者疗效显著,能有效改善肝功能和肝纤维化指标,且使用安全。

关键词: 慢性乙型肝炎, 恩替卡韦, 硫普罗宁, 肝功能, 肝纤维化

Abstract: Objective To explore the clinical efficacy of tiopronin combined with entecavir in the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B with focus on serum liver function and liver fibrosis index. Methods 116 patients with chronic hepatitis B admitted to our hospital between June 2015 and June 2016 were recruited,and were randomly divided into control group and observation group,with 58 cases in each group. Serum liver function,liver fibrosis index,and serologic and virologic markers were detected routinely. Results At the end of three month treatment,serum ALT level in the observation group was(41.2±11.7) U/L,which was significantly lower than that in the control group(49.7±12.4) U/L,P<0.01),AST level was(37.2±25.2) U/L,which was significantly lower than that in the control group[(51.3±30.2) U/L,P<0.01),the levels of ALB was(35.2±2.5) g/L,not significantly different as compared with that in the control;serum level of HA was(93.9±4.2) μg/L,which was significantly lower than that in the control group [(103.6±35.1) μg/L,P<0.01],serum level of LN was (103.6±38.2) μg/L,which was significantly lower than that in the control group[(127.9±40.5) μg/L,P<0.01],serum level of C-IV was(105.2±40.3) μg/L,which was significantly lower than that in the control group [(133.8±35.1) μg/L,P<0.01),and serum level of PCIII was(75.3±16.7) μg/L,which was significantly lower than that in the control group [(91.2±18.5) μg/L,P<0.05)];serum negative rates of HBV DNA in the two groups were 60.3% vs. 60.3%(P>0.05) and no serum HBsAg or HBeAg negativity occurred in the two groups;there was no severe side effects in both groups. Conclusion The clinical efficacy of tiopronin combined with entecavir in the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B is significant,especially on the improvement of liver function and liver fibrosis index,and the therapy is safe.

Key words: Chronic hepatitis B, Tiopronin, Entecavir, Efficacy