实用肝脏病杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (3): 339-342.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2016.03.021

• 胆石症 • 上一篇    下一篇

腹腔镜手术与传统手术治疗胆管结石临床疗效对比研究

魏志力,耿智敏   

  1. 712000 陕西省咸阳核工业215医院肝胆外科(魏志力);西安交通大学第一附属医院肝胆外科(耿智敏)
  • 收稿日期:2015-06-30 出版日期:2016-05-10 发布日期:2016-05-20
  • 通讯作者: 耿智敏,E-mail:Damononly@163.com
  • 作者简介:魏志力,男,40岁,大学本科,副主任医师。主要从事肝胆外科疾病研究

Comparison of clinical efficacy of laparoscopic surgery and conventional surgery in treatment of patients with biliary calculi

Wei Zhili,Geng Zhimin   

  1. Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery,Nuclear Industry 215th Hospital,Xianyang 712000,Shaanxi Province,China
  • Received:2015-06-30 Online:2016-05-10 Published:2016-05-20

摘要: 目的 比较腹腔镜手术与传统手术治疗胆管结石患者的临床效果。方法 回顾性分析2012年1月~2015年6月我院收治的胆管结石患者的临床病历资料,其中观察组行腹腔镜微创手术,对照组行传统开腹手术,比较两组患者术后的临床治疗效果及安全性。结果 92例观察组手术时间、胃肠恢复时间、术后住院时间分别为(65.32±11.67) min、(11.73±6.59) h和(5.7±2.3) d,短于67例对照组[分别为(92.80±13.55) min、(32.86±8.29) h和(9.6±1.9)d,P<0.05];观察组术中出血量和术后引流量分别为(34.62±10.85) ml和(17.25±5.34) ml,少于对照组的(62.31±13.76)ml和(36.87±6.04)ml(均P<0.05);观察组住院总费用高于对照组[(6320.5±775.0)元对(4971.4±896.3)元,P<0.05];两组患者术后均发生不同程度的并发症如出血、切口感染、胆总管结石、肝源性胰腺炎、胆漏和胆管损伤,其中观察组术后出血、切口感染和肝源性胰腺炎发生率分别为3.26%、2.17%和2.17%,低于对照组的13.43%、10.45%和13.43%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组患者胆总管结石、胆漏和胆管损伤发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 腹腔镜手术治疗胆管结石具有疗效显著,安全性高的特点,临床有重要的推广价值。

关键词: 胆管结石, 腹腔镜手术, 传统开腹手术, 临床疗效

Abstract: Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of laparoscopic surgery and conventional surgery in the treatment of patients with biliary calculi. Methods The clinical data of patients with biliary calculi in our hospital from January 2012 to June 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients in observation group(n=92) underwent laparoscopic minimally invasive procedure,while in the control group(n=67) was treated by conventional open surgery. The clinical efficacy and safety of these two methods were compared. Results The operation durations,times for the recovery of gastrointestinal functions,and postoperative hospital stays in observation group were shorter than those in control group[(65.32±11.67) min vs. (92.80±13.55) min,(11.73±6.59) h vs. (32.86±8.29) h,and (5.7±2.3) d vs. (9.6±1.9) d,respectively,P<0.05 for all];the amounts of bleeding during surgery and the volumes of postoperative drainage were lower in observation group as well[(34.62±10.85) ml vs. (62.31±13.76) ml,(17.25±5.34) ml vs. (36.87±6.04) ml,respectively,P<0.05 for both];However,the hospitalization expense in observation group was higher than that in control group[(6320.5±775.0) yuan vs.(4971.4±896.3) yuan,P<0.05];Postoperative complications,such as postoperative bleeding,infection at incision,choledocholithiasis, hepatogenic pancreatitis,biliary leakage and bile duct injury,occurred in both groups,but the incidences of postoperative bleeding,infection,and hepatogenic pancreatitis in observation group(3.26%,2.17%,and 2.17%,respectively),were significantly lower than those in control group(13.43%,10.45% and 13.43%,respectively,P<0.05 for all);The incidences of choledocholithiasis,biliary leakage and bile duct injury in both groups were of no difference. Conclusion Laparoscopic surgery has been proved clinically effective and safe in the treatment of patients with biliary calculi,and is worth practicing.

Key words: Biliary calculi, Laparoscopic surgey, Conventional open surgery, Clinical efficacy