实用肝脏病杂志 ›› 2015, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (2): 132-135.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2015.02.007

• 肝癌 • 上一篇    下一篇

抗病毒治疗对乙型肝炎相关肝癌根治术后复发和生存的影响*

王伯庆, 薛峰, 佟庆, 徐林, 唐津天, 尹继炜, 张国庆, 丁伟   

  1. 830011 乌鲁木齐市 新疆医科大学附属肿瘤医院肝胆胰外科
  • 收稿日期:2014-12-18 出版日期:2015-03-10 发布日期:2016-02-19
  • 通讯作者: 丁伟,E-mail: dingwei2@medmail.com.cn
  • 作者简介:王伯庆,男,医学博士。研究方向:原发性肝癌的基础与临床治疗。E-mail:bqwanghps@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    新疆医科大学“天山英才工程”专项(编号:Y0382061)

Recurrence-free survival and overall survival in patients with hepatitis B-related liver cancer receiving antiviral therapy

Wang Boqing, Xue Feng, Tong Qing, et al.   

  1. Deaprtment of Hepatobiliarypancreatic Surgery,Affiliated Tumor Hospital,Xinjiang Medical University,Urumqi 830011,China
  • Received:2014-12-18 Online:2015-03-10 Published:2016-02-19

摘要: 目的 探讨口服核苷(酸)类似物抗乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)治疗对原发性肝癌根治术后患者复发和生存的影响。方法 收集2004年1月至2006年12月期间在我科行根治术的血清HBV DNA阳性的具有完整的临床和随访资料的肝癌患者156例。术后分为单纯手术的对照组80例和同时接受手术和核苷类似物抗病毒治疗的76例,抗病毒方案为口服拉米夫定/阿德福韦酯或恩替卡韦。应用Kaplan-Meier法比较两组术后无复发生存率和总生存率的差异。结果 76例接受抗病毒治疗患者术后1 m和3 m血清HBV DNA水平分别为(1.63±1.15)×104 copies/ml和<1×102copies/ml,较抗病毒前显著降低(P<0.05),而80例未抗病毒治疗患者血清HBV DNA水平无明显变化;未抗病毒组患者平均无复发生存时间为(10.25±2.56)月,而抗病毒组为[(21.43±3.35)月,P<0.01];未抗病毒组和抗病毒组患者1 a、3 a、5 a无复发生存率分别为54.6%、22.3%、0.0%和73.1%、36.2%、23.4%,两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);未抗病毒组患者平均总生存时间为(18.42±3.21)月,抗病毒治疗组为[(30.28±2.62)月,P<0.01];未抗病毒治疗组和抗病毒组患者1 a、3 a、5 a总生存率分别为81.2%、42.0%、16.3%和92.2%、73.4%、31.6%,两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 对于血清HBV DNA阳性的肝癌患者,在根治术后给予规范的抗病毒治疗可以改善预后,延长生存时间。

关键词: 肝癌, 乙型肝炎, 核苷(酸)类似物, 肝切除, 生存率

Abstract: Objective To investigate the difference of recurrence-free survival and overall survival in patients with hepatitis B-related hepatocellular carcinoma receiving and not receiving antiviral therapy. Methods 156 patients with serum HBV DNA positive liver cancer underwent radical resection were randomly selected in our hospital from January 2004 to December 2006. All of them had complete clinical and follow-up data. They were divided into two groups,80 had operation and 76 had postoperative nucleoside analogue antiviral treatment. The antiviral strategies including oral lamivudine and adefovir or entecavir. Kaplan Meier method was applied to compare postoperative recurrence-free survival and overall survival between the two groups. Results The serum HBV DNA loads were(1.63±1.15)×104 copies/ml and less than 1×102copies/ml in 76 patients receiving antiviral therapy one month and three months after operation,much lower than at presentation(P<0.05),while serum HBV DNA loads did not change in 80 patients without antiviral therapy;the recurrence-free survival in 80 patients without antiviral therapy was (10.25±2.56) m,while it was [(21.43±3.35) m,P<0.01] in 76 patients with antiviral therapy;the 1 a,3 a and 5 a recurrence-free survival rates in 80 patients without antiviral treatment were 54.6%,22.3% and 0.0%,while they were 73.1%,36.2% and 23.4% in 76 patients with antiviral therapy(P<0.05);the overall survival in 80 patients without antiviral therapy was(18.42±3.21)m,while it was [(30.28±2.62)m,P<0.01] in 76 patients with antiviral therapy;the overall survival rates at 1 a,3 a and 5 a in 80 patients without antiviral therapy were 81.2%,42.0% and 16.3%,while they were 92.2%,73.4% and 31.6% in 76 patients with antiviral therapy(P<0.05). Conclusion Standard antiviral treatment can improve prognosis and prolong the total survival in patients with serum HBV DNA positive liver cancer.

Key words: Liver cancer, Hepatitis B, Nucleoside analogues, Hepatectomy, Survival