实用肝脏病杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (5): 733-736.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2026.05.024

• 肝癌 • 上一篇    下一篇

增强CT扫描评估TACE术治疗原发性肝癌患者效果研究*

张莉, 杨均铖, 王佳, 杨国栋, 毛欢, 罗云蔓   

  1. 438000 湖北省黄冈市中心医院医学影像科(张莉,杨均铖,毛欢);医学肿瘤科(杨国栋,罗云蔓);湖南师范大学附属第一医院科研部(王佳)
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-01 发布日期:2026-09-14
  • 通讯作者: 罗云蔓,E-mail:15507193215@163.com
  • 作者简介:张莉,女,37岁,大学本科,主治医师。E-mail:15507193215@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    湖北省自然科学基金资助项目(编号:2025AFD330);湖南师范大学附属第一医院/湖南省人民医院院级专项科研基金资助项目(编号:2022YLT005)

Assessment of therapeutic effectiveness by contrast-enhanced CT scan in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after TACE therapy

Zhang Li, Yang Juncheng, Wang Jia, et al   

  1. Department of Radiology, Central Hospital,Huanggang 438000,Hubei Province,China
  • Received:2025-12-01 Published:2026-09-14

摘要: 目的 探讨增强CT扫描评估经肝动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)术治疗肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的效果。方法 2023年5月~2025年5月我院收治的80例HCC患者,均行2次TACE治疗。治疗前后行增强CT扫描,经后处理获取病灶平扫及动脉期、门静脉期和延迟期CT值,计算增强指数。应用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)分析CT扫描参数评估TACT术后疗效的效能。结果 按照mRECIST评价标准,本组HCC患者术后获得客观缓解46例(57.5%),未获得客观缓解34例(42.5%);治疗后,客观缓解组病灶平扫、动脉期、门静脉期和延迟期CT值分别为(45.3±4.6)HU、(93.3±8.7)HU、(71.1±9.3)HU和(65.8±9.1)HU,均显著大于未缓解组【分别为(38.3±2.4)HU、(70.1±8.3)HU、(62.8±7.6)HU和(62.3±8.2)HU,P<0.05】;客观缓解组病灶动脉期、门脉期和延迟期增强指数分别为(0.6±0.2)、(0.9±0.1)和(0.9±0.2),均显著大于未缓解组【分别为(0.5±0.1)、(0.8±0.2)和(0.8±0.1),P<0.05】;ROC曲线分析显示,增强CT扫描病灶CT值联合增强指数评估TACE术后疗效的AUC值为0.839,95%CI为0.658~0.874,其敏感度为82.5%,特异度为83.9%。结论 采用增强CT扫描测量病灶CT值和增强指数可有效评估TACE术治疗HCC患者的效果,具有很大的临床应用价值。

关键词: 肝细胞癌, 经肝动脉化疗栓塞术, 增强CT扫描, CT值, 增强指数, 治疗

Abstract: Objective The aim of this study was to explore assessment of therapeutic effectiveness by contrast-enhanced CT scan in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) therapy. Methods 80 patients with HCC were encountered in our hospital between May 2023 and May 2025, and all underwent TACE therapy for two times at one-month interval. All patients received contrast-enhanced CT scan to record CT value of lesions and enhancement index was calculated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn to evaluate predicting efficacy of CT parameters. Results Of 80 patients with HCC in our series, Objective remission (OR) was obtained in 46 cases(57.5%)and didn’t (NOR) obtain in 34 cases (42.5%) based on mRECIST criteria; after treatment, CT values of lesions at plain scan, contrast-enhanced scans at arterial phase, portal vein phase and delayed phase in OR group were (45.3±4.6)HU, (93.3±8.7)HU, (71.1±9.3)HU and (65.8±9.1)HU, all much greater than [(38.3±2.4)HU, (70.1±8.3)HU, (62.8±7.6)HU and (62.3±8.2)HU, respectively, P<0.05] in NOR group; enhancement indexes at arterial phase, portal vein phase and delayed phase were(0.6±0.2), (0.9±0.1) and (0.9±0.2), all much greater than [(0.5±0.1), (0.8±0.2) and (0.8±0.1), respectively, P<0.05] in NOR group; ROC analysis showed that the AUC was 0.839 (95%CI:0.658-0.874), with sensitivity of 82.5% and specificity of 83.9%, when CT value of cancerous lesions was combined with enhancement index in predicting good efficacy of TACE. Conclusion The quantitative parameters of contrast-enhanced CT scan could relatively correctly predict therapeutic effect of TACE in patients with HCC, which might guide clinicians make further interventional strategy.

Key words: Hepatocellular carcinoma, Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, Contrast-enhanced CT scan, CT value, Enhancement index, Therapy