实用肝脏病杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (3): 471-474.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2026.03.038

• 胆石症 • 上一篇    下一篇

布比卡因脂质体与罗哌卡因腹横肌平面阻滞处理单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术后镇痛效果比较*

孟思敏, 姚程亮, 朱国颖, 解成兰, 王军   

  1. 223002 江苏省淮安市 徐州医科大学附属淮安医院麻醉科
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-12 出版日期:2026-05-10 发布日期:2026-05-18
  • 通讯作者: 王军,E-mail:wangjunmz@163.com
  • 作者简介:孟思敏,女,27岁,硕士研究生。研究方向:临床麻醉技能与研究。E-mail:15735852988@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    *江苏省卫生健康委科研项目(编号:Z2020080)

Comparison of liposomal bupivacaine and ropivacaine transversus abdominis plane block for analgesia after single-hole laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with gall bladder stones

Meng Simin, Yao Chengliang, Zhu Guoying, et al   

  1. Department of Anesthesiology, Huai'an Hospital Affiliated to Xuzhou Medical University, Huai'an 223002, Jiangsu Province, China
  • Received:2025-09-12 Online:2026-05-10 Published:2026-05-18

摘要: 目的 比较布比卡因脂质体(LB)与罗哌卡因(R)行腹横肌平面阻滞(TAPB)处理接受单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(SHLC)治疗患术后镇痛效果。方法 2024年3月~2025年3月我院收治的79例胆囊结石患者,均接受SHLC术。在手术结束,随机将患者分为两组,分别接受LB(n=39)或R(n=40)在超声引导下行腹横肌平面神经阻滞镇痛。应用疼痛数字评价量表(NRS)评估镇痛效果,应用Athens失眠量表(AIS)评估睡眠质量。结果 两组手术时间、麻醉时间和瑞芬太尼用量无显著性差异(P>0.05);在术后12 h、24 h、48 h和72 h,LB组运动状态NRS评分分别为(3.1±1.1)、(2.8±1.1)、(2.6±0.9)和(2.1±0.8)分,均显著低于R组【分别为(4.2±1.1)、(4.4±1.2)、(3.8±1.1)和(2.9±0.9)分,P<0.05】,静息状态NRS评分分别为(2.3±1.0)、(2.1±0.9)、(1.9±1.0)和(1.4±0.8)分,均显著低于R组【分别为(3.6±1.0)、(3.3±1.0)、(2.7±0.9)和(2.1±1.0)分,P<0.05】;LB组术后第1天(POD1)AIS评分为(7.6±1.3)分,显著低于R组【(8.5±1.1)分,P<0.05】;术后,LB组首次肛门排气和下床时间分别为(26.1±4.4)h和(16.6±4.2)h,均显著短于R组【分别为(29.5±4.8)h和(22.4±4.2)h,P<0.05】,补救镇痛率为10.3%,显著低于R组的32.5%(P<0.05)。结论 采用布比卡因脂质体在超声引导下行TAPB处理接受SHLC术患者术后镇痛效果好,保证睡眠,恢复相对快。

关键词: 胆囊结石, 单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术, 腹横肌平面阻滞, 布比卡因脂质体, 镇痛

Abstract: Objective The purpose of this study was to compare the analgesic efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine (LB) and ropivacaine (R) for transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) after single-hole laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SHLC) in patients with gall bladder stones. Methods 79 patients with cholecystolithiasis were encountered in our hospital between March 2024 and March 2025, and all patients underwent SHLC. They were randomly divided into two groups when transferred into post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), for TAPB by LB (n=39) or by R(n=40) under ultrasound guidance. The numerical rating scale (NRS)for pain and Athens insomnia scale (AIS) were recorded. Results There were no statistically significant differences as respect to surgery time, anesthesia time and remifentanil doses used in the two groups (P>0.05); 12 h, 24 h, 48 h and 72 h post-operationally, the NRS scores at exercise in LB group were(3.1±1.1), (2.8±1.1), (2.6±0.9) and (2.1±0.8), all significantly lower than [(4.2±1.1), (4.4±1.2),(3.8±1.1) and (2.9±0.9), P<0.05], and NRS scores at resting were (2.3±1.0), (2.1±0.9), (1.9±1.0) and (1.4±0.8), all significantly lower than [(3.6±1.0), (3.3±1.0), (2.7±0.9) and (2.1±1.0), respectively, P<0.05] in R group; the AIS score at post of day one in LB group was(7.6±1.3), much lower than [(8.5±1.1), P<0.05] in R group; post-operationally, first flatus and ambulation times in LB group were (26.1±4.4)h and (16.6±4.2)h, both significantly shorter than [(29.5±4.8)h and (22.4±4.2)h, respectively, P<0.05], and incidence of rescue analgesia was 10.3%, much lower than 32.5%(P<0.05) in R group. Conclusion Liposomal bupivacaine under ultrasound-guided TAPB could be safely and effectively conducted for postoperative analgesia in patients with cholecystolithiasis undergoing SHLC, which might provide ascertained analgesic efficacy.

Key words: Cholecystolithiasis, Liposomal bupivacaine, Transversus abdominis plane block, Single-hole laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Analgesia