实用肝脏病杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (3): 362-365.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2025.03.011

• 非酒精性脂肪性肝病 • 上一篇    下一篇

估算葡萄糖处置率评估无糖尿病人群代谢相关脂肪性肝病发生风险效能研究*

董旭, 王超群, 陈怡, 朱彤, 葛玲玲, 徐爱静   

  1. 200433 上海市 海军军医大学第一附属医院感染病科(董旭,陈怡,朱彤,葛玲玲,徐爱静);内分泌科(王超群)
  • 收稿日期:2025-01-09 发布日期:2025-05-14
  • 通讯作者: 徐爱静,E-mail:xuaijing86@163.com
  • 作者简介:董旭,男,28岁,硕士研究生,主治医师。主要从事各种急慢性肝病发生机制和临床综合诊治研究。E-mail:yxdongxu@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    *上海市青年科技英才扬帆计划项目(编号:21YF1458800)

Efficacy of estimated glucose disposal rate in predicting risk of metabolism-associated fatty liver disease in individuals without diabetes

Dong Xu, Wang Chaoqun, Chen Yi, et al   

  1. Department of Infectious Diseases, First Affiliated Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China
  • Received:2025-01-09 Published:2025-05-14

摘要: 目的 探讨估算葡萄糖处置率(eGDR)预测无糖尿病人群代谢相关脂肪性肝病(MAFLD)发病的效能。方法 2023年7月~12月海军军医大学第一附属医院体检发现的无糖尿病MAFLD患者468例和健康体检者100例,常规获得临床资料,计算eGDR,应用Logistic多因素回归分析影响MAFLD患病的因素,绘制ROC曲线分析eGDR预测MAFLD的效能。结果 MAFLD患者与健康人比,年龄更大且以男性多见,BMI、收缩压、舒张压、血清甘油三酯、总胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇、空腹血糖、糖化血红蛋白、丙氨酸氨基转移酶、天冬氨酸氨基转移酶、碱性磷酸酶、γ-谷氨酰转肽酶、肌酐、尿素氮和尿酸水平均较高(均P<0.001),而高密度脂蛋白胆固醇和eGDR均较低(均P<0.001);Logistic回归分析显示,年龄和BMI是MAFLD发病的独立危险因素,而舒张压和eGDR是独立保护因素(P<0.05);ROC分析显示,eGDR降低预测MAFLD发生风险的AUC为0.939(95%CI 0.910~0.969,P<0.001),对应的最佳截断点为10.85 mg/kg/min,其敏感度为89.5%,特异度为88.0%;按照eGDR的四分位数分组后Q4组患病率为38.0%,显著低于其他各组(P<0.01)。结论 eGDR作为一种无创且容易获得的衡量胰岛素抵抗的指标,用于预测无糖尿病人群MAFLD发生风险有一定的临床价值,值得深入探讨。

关键词: 代谢相关脂肪性肝病, 估算葡萄糖处置率, 胰岛素抵抗, 无糖尿病人群, 预测

Abstract: Objective The aim of this study was to investigate efficacy of estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) in predicting risk of metabolism-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) in individuals without type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods 468 non-diabetic individuals with MAFLD and 100 non-diabetic healthy persons were encountered in the First Affiliated Hospital, Naval Medical University between July and December 2023, clinical materials were routinely obtained, and eGDR were calculated. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis was applied to reveal risk factors of MAFLD in non-diabetic population. All subjects were divided into Q1 to Q4 groups based on the eGDR quartiles, and the prevalence of MAFLD in each group was compared. ROC curve was plotted to evaluate the efficacy of eGDR in predicting MAFLD. Results Of individuals without diabetes in our series, MAFLD patients were older and more male than in healthy controls; BMI, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, serum triglyceride, total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein-cholesterol, fasting blood glucose, glycated hemoglobin, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase, creatinine, urea nitrogen and uric acid levels were all higher (all P<0.001) , while serum high density lipoprotein-cholesterol and eGDR were lower (all P<0.001) than in control persons; multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that age and BMI were independent risk factors for the occurrence of MAFLD, while diastolic blood pressure and eGDR were independent protective factors (P<0.05) in persons without diabetes; ROC analysis showed that the AUC of eGDR reduction in predicting the risk of MAFLD existence was 0.939 (95% CI:0.910 to 0.969, P<0.001), with a maximum Yoden index of 0.775, corresponding to an optimal cut-off value of 10.85 mg/kg/min, with a sensitivity of 89.5% and a specificity of 88.0%; Q4 group had the lowest prevalence of MAFLD (38.0%) compared to other three groups. Conclusions eGDR is a non-invasive and easily available indicator of insulin resistance. The decrease of eGDR is associated with the increased risk of MAFLD in non-diabetic individuals, and it has a good predictive efficacy for MAFLD.

Key words: Metabolism-associated fatty liver disease, Estimated glucose disposal rate, Insulin resistance, Non-diabetes population, Prediction