实用肝脏病杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (4): 488-491.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2023.04.009

• 非酒精性脂肪性肝病 • 上一篇    下一篇

超声衰减参数诊断体检人群脂肪肝临床应用价值分析*

胡灵溪, 安薪宇, 李妹, 刘百成, 南月敏, 王荣琦   

  1. 050051 石家庄市 河北医科大学第三医院中西医结合肝病科/河北省慢性肝病肝纤维化机制研究重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2022-09-26 出版日期:2023-07-10 发布日期:2023-07-21
  • 通讯作者: 王荣琦,E-mail:wangrongqiw@163.com
  • 作者简介:胡灵溪,女,26岁,硕士研究生。主要从事慢性肝病发病机制与防治研究。E-mail:crazylingxi@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    *河北省自然科学基金资助项目(编号:H2021206140)

Diagnostic performance of ultrasound attenuation parameters in predicting fatty liver diseases in individuals at physical examination

Hu Lingxi, An Xinyu, Li Mei, et al   

  1. Department of Traditional and Western Medical Hepatology, Third Hospital, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050051, Hebei Province, China
  • Received:2022-09-26 Online:2023-07-10 Published:2023-07-21

摘要: 目的 分析超声衰减参数(UAP)诊断体检人群脂肪肝临床应用价值。 方法 2020年11月~2020年12月河北医科大学第三医院体检中心体检人群,除常规血生化检测和腹部超声检查外,还接受iLivTouch检查超声衰减参数(UAP)和肝脏硬度测量(LSM)。应用多因素Logistic回归分析和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析UAP或UAP联合其他指标诊断脂肪肝的效能。 结果 在308例体检人群中,发现健康人56例,脂肪肝患者252例。男性脂肪肝患者远多于女性(P<0.001),而两组年龄无统计学差异(P>0.05);脂肪肝组血清HDL水平显著低于健康人组,而BMI、血清TG、TC、LDL、VLDL、ALT、AST、Cr、UA、GLU和UAP水平均显著高于健康人组(P<0.05);BMI、ALT和UA为影响UAP的独立因素;UAP诊断脂肪肝的截断点为251.35dB/m,其AUC为0.856,敏感度为0.710,特异度为0.839;UAP联合BMI和ALT诊断脂肪肝的AUC为0.920,显著优于各指标单独检测。 结论 使用iLivTouch检查可诊断脂肪肝,结合BMI和血生化指标可能更有助于诊断。

关键词: 脂肪肝, 超声衰减参数, 瞬时弹性成像, 诊断

Abstract: Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic performance of ultrasound attenuation parameters (UAP) in predicting fatty liver diseases (FLD) in individuals at physical examination. Methods The general data, biochemical indexes, ultrasonography, UAP and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by iLivTouch in individuals at physical examination were collected in Physical Examination Center, Third Hospital, Hebei Medical University between November and December 2020, and the diagnostic efficacy of UAP was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results Among the 308 subjects, the FLD was found in 252 cases, with 56 persons without; the male patients with FLD accounted for the most, much greater than female patients (P<0.001), while there was no significant difference as respect to ages between the those with and without FLD (P>0.05); serum HDL level in patients with FLD was significantly lower than, while the BMI, serum TG, TC, LDL, VLDL, ALT, AST, Cr, UA, GLU and UAP were significantly higher than those in healthy persons (P<0.05); the BMI, ALT and UA were the independent predictors for higher UAP, and the cut-off value was 251.35 dB/m, with the AUC of 0.856, the sensitivity of 0.710 and the specificity of 0.839, when the UAP was applied to diagnose the FLD; the diagnostic performance by the combination of UAP, BMI and ALT for FLD with AUC of 0.920 was superior to any parameter done alone. Conclusion The UAP obtained by iLivTouch scam could diagnose the FLD, and it might be helpful to take the BMI and serum ALT into consideration.

Key words: Fatty liver diseases, Ultrasound attenuation parameter, iLivTouch, Diagnosis