实用肝脏病杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (6): 857-860.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2022.06.025

• 肝硬化 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于超声参数的半定量评分评估乙型肝炎肝硬化食管静脉曲张价值探讨*

李响, 张铁英, 张旭辉, 孟繁坤   

  1. 100069 北京市 首都医科大学附属北京佑安医院超声与功能诊断中心
  • 收稿日期:2022-04-13 出版日期:2022-11-10 发布日期:2022-11-22
  • 通讯作者: 孟繁坤,E-mail:mengfankun818@126.com
  • 作者简介:李响,男,38岁,医学硕士,主治医师。E-mail:lixiangusdoc@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    *北京市科技计划项目(编号:2018-TG-23)

Evaluation of esophageal varices by semi-quantitative scoring based on ultrasonography in patients with hepatitis B cirrhosis

Li Xiang, Zhang Tieying, Zhang Xuhui, et al.   

  1. Centre of Ultrasonography and Functional Diagnosis, You'an Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University,Beijing 100069,China
  • Received:2022-04-13 Online:2022-11-10 Published:2022-11-22

摘要: 目的 探讨基于超声参数的半定量评分评估乙型肝炎肝硬化食管静脉曲张(EV)程度的应用价值。方法 2020年6月~2022年1月我院接受胃镜检查的乙型肝炎肝硬化患者124例,常规行肝脏超声检查并进行半定量评分,基于血生化结果和人口学资料计算基于4因子的纤维化指数(FIB-4)和天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶/血小板计数指数(APRI),绘制受试者工作特征曲线评价各指标评估中重度EV的效能。结果 在124例乙型肝炎肝硬化患者中,胃镜检查提示G0期46例(37.1%)、G1期30例(24.2%)、G2期28例(22.6%)和G3期20例(16.1%),其中中重度EV(G2/G3)患者48例(38.7%);G2/G3期患者超声半定量评分、FIB-4和APRI水平分别为(13.1±1.9)、(5.7±1.1)和(1.7±0.3),显著高于G1期【分别为(11.8±1.5)、(4.2±0.7)和(1.1±0.2),P<0.05】或G0期【分别为(10.8±1.7)、(2.7±0.5)和(0.7±0.2),P<0.05】;超声半定量评分、FIB-4和APRI评估中重度EV的截断点分别为12.7、5.0和1.4,其灵敏度和特异度分别为91.7%和73.7%、89.6%和67.1%,和87.5%和72.4%,各指标的诊断效能无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论 基于超声参数的半定量评分作为一种无创诊断手段评估乙型肝炎肝硬化患者中重度EV也有一定的应用价值,值得深入探讨。

关键词: 肝硬化, 食管静脉曲张, 内镜检查, 肝脏超声半定量评分, 诊断

Abstract: Objective The aim of this study was to explore the application of semi-quantitative scoring (SQS) based on ultrasonography in evaluating the severity of esophageal varices (EV) in patients with hepatitis B cirrhosis. Methods 124 patients with hepatitis B cirrhosis underwent gastroscopy in our hospital between June 2020 and January 2022. The routine liver ultrasonography and semi-quantitative scoring were conducted. Based on blood biochemical index and demographic data, the fibrosis index based on the four factors (FIB-4) and aspartate aminotransferase/platelet index (APRI) were calculated. The evaluation efficacy of each index for moderate to severe EV was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results The gastroscopy showed that among the 124 patients with hepatitis B cirrhosis, there were 46 cases (37.1%) in stage G0, 30 cases (24.2%) in stage G1, 28 cases (22.6%) in stage G2 and 20 cases (16.1%) in stage G3 of EV, e.g. 48 cases (38.7%) with moderate to severe EV (G2-G3); the SQS, FIB-4 and APRI scores in patients at stages G2-G3 were (13.1±1.9), (5.7±1.1) and (1.7±0.3), significantly higher than [(11.8±1.5) , (4.2±0.7) and (1.1±0.2), P<0.05] in patient with stage G1 or [(10.8±1.7) , (2.7±0.5) and (0.7±0.2), respectively, P<0.05] in those with stage G0; the cut-off values of SQS, FIB-4 and APRI for assessing moderate to severe EV were 12.7, 5.0 and 1.4, respectively, and their sensitivity and specificity were 91.7% and 73.7%, 89.6% and 67.1%, and 87.5% and 72.4%, without significant differences as respect to the diagnostic performance among them (P>0.05). Conclusion As a non-invasive approach, the application of semi-quantitative scoring based on ultrasonography is practical in evaluating moderate to severe EV in patients with hepatitis B cirrhosis.

Key words: Liver cirrhosis, Esophageal varices, Digestive endoscope, Ultrasonography, Semi-quantitative scoring, Diagnosis