实用肝脏病杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (4): 599-602.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2022.04.036

• 胆囊癌 • 上一篇    下一篇

胆囊切除联合肝组织楔形切除和区域淋巴结清扫治疗胆囊癌患者疗效研究*

邹吉, 陈晓波, 董仁华, 张浩   

  1. 620010 四川省眉山市 四川大学华西医院附属眉山医院肝胆外科(邹吉);肝胆胰外科(董仁华);昆明理工大学附属医院肝胆胰外科(陈晓波);西南医科大学附属医院肝胆外科(张浩)
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-22 出版日期:2022-07-10 发布日期:2022-07-14
  • 作者简介:邹吉,男,46岁,大学本科,副主任医师。E-mail:18090060268@189.cn
  • 基金资助:
    *四川省眉山市科技局科研基金资助项目(编号:2020LH02141)

Long-term survival of patients with stageT1b gallbladder cancer after cholecystectomy and wedge resection of liver tissues and regional lymph node dissection combination therapy

Zou Ji, Chen Xiaobo, Dong Renhua, et al   

  1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Meishan People's Hospital, Affiliated to West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Meishan 620010, Sichuan Province, China
  • Received:2021-12-22 Online:2022-07-10 Published:2022-07-14

摘要: 目的 总结采取胆囊切除联合肝组织楔形切除和区域淋巴结清扫治疗T1b期胆囊癌(GC)患者的疗效。方法 2011年8月~2016年8月我院收治的98例T1b期GC患者,其中53例观察组患者接受胆囊切除联合肝组织楔形切除和区域淋巴结清扫术治疗,另45例对照组患者单纯接受胆囊切除术治疗。采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评价术后疼痛。随访患者5年或至死亡。结果 观察组术中出血量显著多于对照组【(208.3±20.2) mL对(185.7±19.4)mL】,术后胃肠功能恢复时间和住院时间分别为(27.5±5.8)h和(11.7±2.6)d,显著长于对照组【分别为(19.9±4.2)h和(9.4±2.1)d,P<0.05】;在术后24 h和72 h,观察组VAS评分分别为(4.5±0.8)分和(2.1±0.7)分,与对照组的(4.4±0.9)分和(2.0±0.6)分比,无显著性差异(P>0.05);术后观察组胆囊窝积液、胃潴留、腹腔内出血、胆漏和腹腔感染等发生率为15.1%,对对照组的9.3%比,无显著性差异(P>0.05);随访6个月~5年,观察组1 a、3 a和5 a累积生存率分别为96.2%、81.1%和67.9%,对照组分别为91.1%、73.3%和55.6%,其中观察组5 a累积生存率显著高于对照组(Log-Rank x2=4.521,P=0.034)。结论 采用胆囊切除联合肝组织楔形切除和区域淋巴结清扫治疗T1b期GC患者的疗效较好,可提高远期生存率。

关键词: 胆囊癌, 胆囊切除, 肝组织楔形切除, 区域淋巴清扫术, 治疗

Abstract: Objective The aim of this study was to summarize the long-term survival of patients with stage T1b gallbladder cancer (GC) after cholecystectomy and wedge resection of liver tissues and regional lymph node dissection (LND) combination therapy. Methods A total of 98 patients with stage T1b GC were encountered in our hospital between August 2011 and August 2016, and 53 in observation group received cholecystectomy and wedge resection of liver tissues and LND therapy and another 45 patients received cholecystectomy only therapy. All patients were followed-up for five years or to death. The postoperative pain was assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS). Results The intraoperative blood loss in the observation group was greater than that in the control group [(208.3±20.2) mL vs. (185.7±19.4) mL], the postoperative recovery time of gastrointestinal functions and hospitalization stay were longer than those in the control group [(27.5±5.8) h and (11.7±2.6) d vs. (19.9±4.2) h and (9.4±2.1) d, respectively, P<0.05]; at 24 h and 72 h post-operationally, the VAS score in the observation group was (4.5±0.8) and (2.1±0.7), not significantly different compared to (4.4±0.9) and (2.0±0.6) in the control (P>0.05); post-operationally, the complications such as cystic fossa effusion, gastric retention, intraperitoneal hemorrhage, bile leakage and peritoneal infections in the observation group was 15.1%, not significantly different as compared to 9.3% in the control (P>0.05); the one-year, three-year and five-year survival rates in the observation group were 96.2%, 81.1% and 67.9%, while in the control group were 91.1%, 73.3% and 55.6%, with the five-year survivals significantly different (Log-Rank x2=4.521, P=0.034). Conclusion The combination of cholecystectomy and wedge resection of liver tissues and regional LND is efficacious in dealing with patients with stage T1b GC, which could improve long-term prognosis.

Key words: Gallbladder cancer, Cholecystectomy, Wedge resection of liver tissues, Regional lymph node dissection, Therapy