实用肝脏病杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (1): 111-114.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2021.01.029

• 肝癌 • 上一篇    下一篇

五种评分系统判断TACE术治疗原发性肝癌患者发生肝功能不全效能比较研究

张雪, 胥莹, 安文慧, 张帮婷, 杨雪芳   

  1. 650000 昆明市 昆明医科大学第二附属医院消化内科
  • 出版日期:2021-01-10 发布日期:2021-01-19
  • 通讯作者: 张雪,女,25岁,硕士研究生。主要从事肝胆胰内科疾病诊治研究。E-mail:13008685790@163.com
       通讯作者:胥莹,E-mail:xuying_0505@163.com
  • 作者简介:张雪,女,25岁,硕士研究生。主要从事肝胆胰内科疾病诊治研究。E-mail:13008685790@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    云南省科技人才和平台计划项目(编号:2019IC034)

Value of five scoring systems in predicting liver dysfunction after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in patients with primary liver cancer

Zhang Xue, Xu Ying, An Wenhui,et al   

  1. Department of Gastroenterolgy, Second Affiliated Hospital,Kunming Medical University,Kunming 65000,Yunnan Province, China
  • Online:2021-01-10 Published:2021-01-19

摘要: 目的 比较CTP评分、终末期肝病模型(MELD)、MELD联合吲哚菁绿(ICG)清除试验(MELD-ICG)评分、慢性肝功能不全(CLD)评分和改良的白蛋白胆红素(mALBI)评分预测经肝动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)治疗的原发性肝癌(PLC)患者术后发生早期肝功能不全的效能。方法 2018年12月~2019年12月我院收治的87例PLC患者,均接受TACE治疗,分别计算术前CTP、MELD、MELD-ICG、CLD和ALBI五种模型评分,随访术后发生肝功能失代偿情况。绘制受试者工作曲线(ROC)并计算曲线下面积(AUC)对五种评分的预测效能作出比较。结果 在87例患者中,术后发生肝功能不全27例(31.0%);术前,肝功能不全组CTP、MELD、MELD-ICG、CLD和mALBI评分分别为(6.9±1.1)、12.0(10.0~14.0)、27.4(20.2~35.0)、(1.5±0.9)和(2.6±1.5),显著高于60例肝功能代偿组; CTP、MELD、MELD-ICG、CLD和mALBI评分预测的AUC分别为:0.708、0.787、0.827、0.735和0.723,其中MELD-ICG预测术后发生肝功能不全的AUC为0.827(95%CI:0.730~0.899),显著高于CTP或CLD或mALBI。结论 CTP、MELD、MELD-ICG、CLD和mALBI五种评分系统均是预测PLC患者TACE术后发生肝功能不全的有效工具,但以MELD-ICG评分的预测价值最佳。

关键词: 原发性肝癌, 肝动脉化疗栓塞, 肝功能不全, 肝功能预测模型

Abstract: Objective The aim of this study was to compare CTP score, end-stage liver disease model (MELD), MELD combined with indocyanine green (ICG) clearance test (MELD-ICG) score, chronic liver dysfunction (CLD) score and modified albumin bilirubin (mALBI) scores for predicting early liver dysfunction in patients with primary liver cancer (PLC) undergoing transhepatic arterial chemoembolization (TACE). Methods A retrospective analysis was performed in 87 PLC patients underwent TACE treatment in our hospital from December 2018 through December 2019, and the preoperative CTP, MELD, MELD-ICG, CLD and ALBI scores were calculated. The area under receiver operating curve (AUC) was applied to predict the incidence of liver dysfunction. Results 27 (31.0%) out of 87 patients with PLC after TACE developed postoperative hepatic insufficiency in our series; the preoperative CTP, MELD, MELD-ICG, CLD and ALBI scores in the 27 patients with hepatic insufficiency were (6.9±1.1), 12.0 (10.0 -14.0), 27.4 (20.2-35.0), (1.5±0.9) and (2.6±1.5), significantly higher than in 60 patients with compensated liver functions; the AUC of CTP, MELD, MELD-ICG, CLD and mALBI were 0.708, 0.787, 0.827, 0.735 and 0.723, with the AUC of MELD-ICG in predicting postoperative hepatic insufficiency highest [0.827 (95% CI: 0.730-0.899), significantly higher than CTP or CLD or mALBI .Conclusion The five scoring systems of CTP, MELD, MELD-ICG, CLD and mALBI are all efficacious tools for predicting hepatic dysfunction after TACE in patients with PLC, and the MELD-ICG score has the best predictive value and needs further investigation.

Key words: Primary liver cancer, Transhepatic arterial chemoembolization, Liver dysfunction, Liver function predicting scoring system