实用肝脏病杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (2): 248-251.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2020.02.025

• 肝硬化 • 上一篇    下一篇

脾切除术联合门奇静脉断流术治疗肝硬化门脉高压症患者疗效研究*

阿思根, 夏医君, 武慧军, 薛荣泉, 辛瑞强, 白斯古楞, 赵德芳   

  1. 010010 呼和浩特市 内蒙古自治区人民医院肝胆胰脾外科(阿思根,夏医君,武慧军,薛荣泉,辛瑞强);通辽市医院普外科(白斯古楞);内蒙古医科大学第一附属医院肝胆外科(赵德芳)
  • 收稿日期:2019-04-01 出版日期:2020-03-10 发布日期:2020-04-20
  • 通讯作者: 赵德芳,E-mail:603698904@qq.com
  • 作者简介:阿思根,男,35岁,硕士研究生,主治医师
  • 基金资助:
    内蒙古自治区自然科学基金资助项目[编号:2017MS(LH)0845]

Efficacy of laparoscopic portal-azygos vein devascularization and splenectomy in treatment of patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension

A Sigen, Xia Yijun, Wu Huijun, et al   

  1. Department of Hepatobiliary,Pancreatic and Splenic Surgery,Inner Mongolia People’s Hospital, Hohhot 010010,Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China
  • Received:2019-04-01 Online:2020-03-10 Published:2020-04-20

摘要: 目的 研究腹腔镜门奇静脉断流术联合脾切除术治疗肝硬化门脉高压症合并巨脾患者的效果。方法 2016年12月~2018年12月我院收治的86例肝硬化并发门脉高压症合并巨脾患者被分为两组,每组43例,其中对照组行开腹,而观察组实施腹腔镜下门奇静脉断流术联合脾切除术。结果 观察组术中出血量为(180.8±23.1)ml,显著少于对照组的【(286.4±35.7)ml,P<0.05】,术后住院日为(6.0±1.3)d,显著短于对照组的【(8.6±1.5)d,P<0.05】;观察组术后7 d外周血WBC为(8.9±1.4)×109/L,PLC为(132.0±28.9)×109/L,对照组分别为(7.2±1.8)×109/L,PLC为(125.6±30.3)×109/L,均较术前显著升高(P<0.05);观察组术后门静脉直径为(1.2±0.1)cm,血流量为(911.7±261.7)ml/min,对照组分别为(1.2±0.2)cm,血流量为(888.5±191.5)ml/min,均较术前显著缩小或下降(P<0.05);观察组术后并发症发生率为9.3%,显著低于对照组的37.2%(P<0.05)。结论 腹腔镜下门奇静脉断流术联合脾切除术治疗肝硬化门脉高压症合并巨脾患者临床疗效确切,创伤小,术后并发症发生率低,恢复快。

关键词: 肝硬化, 门脉高压症, 门奇静脉断流术, 脾切除术, 腹腔镜

Abstract: Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of laparoscopic portal-azygos vein devascularization and splenectomy in treatment of patients withcirrhotic portal hypertension. Methods 86 patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension complicated with megaspleen were enrolled in our hospital between December 2016 and December 2018, and 43 patients underwent open and other 43 underwentlaparoscopic portal-azygos vein devascularization and splenectomy. Results The bleeding volume and hospital stay in patients with laparoscopic surgery were(180.8±23.1)ml and (6.0±1.3)d, significantly less or shorter than 【(286.4±35.7)ml and (8.6±1.5)d,P<0.05】 in patients with open surgery; seven days after operation, the white blood cell andplatelet counts in patients with laparoscopic surgery were (8.9±1.4)×109/L and (132.0±28.9)×109/L, and those in patients with open operation were (7.2±1.8)×109/L and (125.6±30.3)×109/L, respectively, all significantly increased as compared to these before operation (P<0.05); the portal vain diameters and blood volume in patients with laparoscopic operationwere(1.2±0.1)cm and (911.7±261.7)ml/min, and those in patients with opensurgery were (1.2±0.2)cm and (888.5±191.5)ml/min, respectively, all significantly narrowed or decreased as compared to these beforeoperation (P<0.05); the post-operational complications in patients with laparoscopic surgery was 9.3%, much lower than 37.2%(P<0.05) in patients with open operation. Conclusion The application of laparoscopic portal-azygos vein devascularization and splenectomy is efficacious in the treatment of patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension and megaspleen. It might have less trauma, low incidence of complications and quick recovery.

Key words: Liver cirrhosis, Portal hypertension, Laparoscopic portal-azygos vein devascularization, Splenectomy, Laparoscopy