实用肝脏病杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (4): 510-513.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2019.04.015

• 病毒性肝炎 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同医院无创性肝纤维化指标预测慢性乙型肝炎患者肝纤维化效能差异分析*

张亚飞, 叶珺, 谢琴秀, 邹桂舟, 李家斌, 李旭, 张振华   

  1. 230601 合肥市 安徽医科大学第二附属医院感染病科 (张亚飞,叶珺,邹桂舟,李旭,张振华);
    第一附属医院感染病科(谢琴秀,李家斌)
  • 收稿日期:2019-02-25 出版日期:2019-07-10 发布日期:2019-07-19
  • 通讯作者: 张振华,E-mail:zzh1974cn@163.com
  • 作者简介:张亚飞,男,37岁,博士研究生,主治医师。主要从事病毒性肝炎基础与临床研究。E-mail:zhangyafei198@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    *国家自然科学基金资助项目(编号:81273142); 安徽省自然科学基金资助项目(编号:1608085MH162)

Difference in predicting efficacy of significant liver fibrosis by noninvasive liver fibrosis index in different hospitals

Zhang Yafei, Ye Jun, Xie Qinxiu, et al   

  1. Department of Infectious Diseases,Second Affiliated Hospital,Anhui Medical University,Hefei 230601,Anhui Province,China
  • Received:2019-02-25 Online:2019-07-10 Published:2019-07-19

摘要: 目的 探讨应用谷草转氨酶/血小板比值(APRI)、基于4因子的纤维化指数(FIB-4)和瞬时弹性成像技术评判不同医院慢性HBV感染者肝纤维化的效能差异。方法 在2所大学附属医院收治的慢性HBV携带者或慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)行肝穿刺,并获得APRI、FIB-4和肝脏硬度检测(LSM)值,采用ROC曲线分析指标的诊断效能。结果 两组分别纳入327例(A组)和250例(B组)患者,两组患者肝组织病理学检查肝纤维化分期和LSM值存在极显著差异(P值均<0.001),而APRI和FIB-4值无显著性统计学差异(P=0.547和0.578);就区分S0-1和≥S2期肝纤维化而言,A组APRI分别为0.14和0.18,B组分别为0.15和0.24,A组FIB-4分别为0.98和1.26,B组分别为0.93和1.50,而A组LSM分别为5.2 kPa和6.8 kPa,B组分别为7.2 kPa和9.0 kPa(P<0.001);A组和B组APRI诊断的截断点分别为0.105和0.145,FIB-4分别为0.675和0.775,而LSM分别为4.650和6.345,其诊断两家医院患者显著性肝纤维化的灵敏度在85%左右,而特异性在24%~46%之间。结论 可能由于一些不可控制的因素存在,导致临床数据的获得在不同医院间不可比,因此也需要经组织病理学检查,以确定APRI、FIB-4和LSM 诊断显著性肝纤维化的截断点,达到最佳诊断效果。

关键词: 慢性乙型肝炎, 肝纤维化, 谷草转氨酶/血小板比值, 基于4因子的纤维化指数, 肝脏硬度检测, 诊断

Abstract: Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the difference in predicting efficacy of significant liver fibrosis by noninvasive liver fibrosis index in different hospitals.Methods Clinical data of patients with chronic HBV infection from two hospitals were retrospectively analyzed,and the liver biopsies were done in all the patients. The APRI,FIB-4 and liver stiffness measure(LSM) were obtained. The diagnostic performance was analyzed by ROC curve.Results We enrolled 327 patients (group A) and 250 patients (group B) from two hospitals respectively;there were significant differences as respect to liver pathological data and LSM in the two groups(both P<0.001),while there were no significant differences respect to APRI or FIB-4 in the two groups (P=0.547 and P=0.578);as for distinguishing liver fibrosis S0-1 and ≥S2,the APRI in group A was set at 0.14 and 0.18,in group B was 0.15 and 0.24,the FIB-4 in group A was 0.98 and 1.26, in group B was 0.93 and 1.50,while the LSM in group A was set at 5.2 kPa and 6.8 kPa,and in group B was 7.2 kPa and 9.0 kPa(P<0.001),respectively;the cut-off-values of APRI in group A and group B were 0.105 and 0.145,of FIB-4 were 0.675 and 0.775,and of LSM were 4.650 and 6.345,respectively,their sensitivities and specificities in predicting significant liver fibrosis of patients from the two hospitals were at about 85% and 24% to 46%. Conclusion The diagnostic performance of APRI,FIB-4 and LSM in predicting significant liver fibrosis might varies,because of some uncontrollable factors. Hence,the cut-off-value of each noninvasive index might be set in every hospital.

Key words: Chronic hepatitis B, Liver fibrosis, Aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index, Fibrosis-4 index, Liver stiffness measurement, Diagnosis