实用肝脏病杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (2): 249-252.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2018.02.023

• 肝癌 • 上一篇    下一篇

乙型肝炎病毒相关性肝癌组织维生素D受体表达情况分析

李玉苓, 郭文征, 张卫民, 孙韬, 赵彩彦   

  1. 061001 河北省沧州市传染病医院中西医肝病科(李玉苓,郭文征,张卫民,孙 韬); 河北医科大学第三医院感染病科(赵彩彦)
  • 收稿日期:2016-09-29 出版日期:2018-03-10 发布日期:2018-03-19
  • 通讯作者: 赵彩彦,E-mail: zhaocy2005@163.com
  • 作者简介:李玉苓,女,33岁,硕士研究生,主治医师。主要从事病毒性肝炎的防治研究。E-mail:lyl_2010@163.com

Expression of vitamin D receptor in cancerous tissues of patients with hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma

Li Yuling, Guo Wenzheng, Zhang Weimin, et al   

  1. Department of Liver Disease,Infectious Disease Hospital,Cangzhou 061001,Hebei Province,China
  • Received:2016-09-29 Online:2018-03-10 Published:2018-03-19

摘要: 目的 探讨乙型肝炎病毒相关性肝细胞癌(HCC)组织维生素D受体(VDR)表达变化及其与癌旁肝硬化组织和正常组织的异同。 方法 取10例乙型肝炎病毒相关性HCC组织及其癌旁肝组织和4例正常肝组织,采用实时荧光定量PCR法检测组织VDR mRNA水平,采用免疫组织化学法检测组织VDR表达,采用Western blot法检测组织VDR蛋白表达。 结果 免疫组织化学法检测发现HCC组织、癌旁组织和正常肝组织均有VDR表达,主要在细胞质表达,而细胞核基本无表达;癌组织VDR mRNA为(2.77±0.30),显著高于癌旁肝硬化组织的(1.62±0.21)或正常肝组织的【(1.57±0.19),P<0.01】;Western blot分析发现,HCC组织VDR蛋白相对表达量为(1.15±0.57),显著高于癌旁肝硬化组织的(1.02±0.25)或正常肝脏组织的【(0.37±0.11),P<0.01】。 结论 VDR可能参与了HCC的发生发展过程。

关键词: 肝细胞癌, 维生素D, 维生素D受体

Abstract: Objective To explore the expression of vitamin D receptor(VDR) in cancerous tissues of patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods The relative levels of VDR mRNA in liver tissues was detected by real-time PCR. VDR expression were determined by immunohistochemical method, and the relative expression of VDR protein was detected by Western blot. Results Immunohistochemistry showed that cancerous tissues, para-cancerous tissues, normal liver tissues expressed VDR equally. VDR was mainly expressed in the cytoplasm, and there was almost no expression in the nucleus. The RT-PCR detection showed that VDR mRNA in cancerous tissues was(2.77±0.30), significantly higher than that in the para- cancerous tissues(1.62±0.21) or normal liver tissues[(1.57±0.19), P<0.01];Western blot showed that the expression of VDR protein in cancerous tissues was(1.15±0.57), significantly higher than that in the para- cancerous tissues(1.02±0.25) or in normal liver tissues[(0.37±0.11), P<0.01]. Conclusion VDR is closely related to the development of hepatocellular carcinoma

Key words: Hepatoma, Vitamin D, Vitamin D receptor