实用肝脏病杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (2): 171-174.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2017.02.011

• 肝硬化 • 上一篇    下一篇

裸金属支架与PTFE-覆膜支架行TIPSS治疗门静脉高压症患者临床疗效对比研究

周筱燕,高 娜,周岩芬   

  1. 710003 西安市 陕西省中医医院心血管病介入科
  • 收稿日期:2016-09-07 出版日期:2017-04-10 发布日期:2017-06-07
  • 通讯作者: 周岩芬,E-mail:zhouyanfen1978@126.com
  • 作者简介:周筱燕,女,36岁,大学本科,主治医师。研究方向:肝硬化消化道大出血的防治。E-mail:zhouxiaoyan1980812@126.com

Comparison of technical and clinical efficacy of bare metal stent and PTFE-stentgraft of TIPSS in the treatment of patients with portal hypertension

Zhou Xiaoyan,Gao Na,Zhou Yanfen.   

  1. Department of Cardiovascular Disease,Chinese Medicine Hospital,Xi’an,710003,Shaanxi Province
  • Received:2016-09-07 Online:2017-04-10 Published:2017-06-07

摘要: 目的 使用裸金属支架(BMS)和聚四氟乙烯(PTFE)覆膜支架行经颈静脉肝内门腔静脉支架分流术(TIPSS)治疗门静脉高压症患者临床疗效和技术设备成本对比分析。方法 2010年5月~2015年6月对163例门静脉高压症患者行TIPSS术,患者平均年龄为(56±12) 岁,女性占32.9 %。其中接受BMS支架80例,接受覆膜支架83例。结果 本组技术成功率为97.5%,术后门体梯度压从(16.1±4.8) mmHg下降至(5.1±2.1) mmHg;两组技术成功率和门体梯度压降无显著性差异;Kaplan-Meier分析显示,两组14 d、6 m和2 a一期支架通畅率存在显著性差别,其中PTFE-覆膜支架组通畅率高;两组1 a生存率和肝性脑病发生率无显著性差异;金属支架和覆膜支架总成本分别为66570元和70455元。结论 TIPSS术是一种安全、有效的治疗门静脉高压症的方法。裸金属支架和PTFE-覆膜支架均具有良好的技术和临床效果,并发症发生率低。

关键词: 门静脉高压症, 经颈静脉肝内门腔静脉支架分流术, 裸金属支架, PTFE-覆膜支架

Abstract: Objective To compare the technical and clinical efficacy of bare metal stent(BMS) and polytetrafluoroethylene(PTFE)-stentgraft of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt(TIPSS) in treatment of patients with portal hypertension(PH).Methods 163 patients(56±12 ys,32.9 % females) with PH receiving TIPSS were recuited in this study,and 80 patients received BMS and 83 received PTFE-stentgraft.Results The technical success rate was 97.5% due to four unsuccessful interventions. The portosystemic gradient decreased from (16.1±4.8) mmHg to(5.1±2.1) mmHg in the successful series. There was no significant differences as respect to technical success rate and portosystemic gradient decrease between the two groups;Kaplan-Meier analysis yielded significant differences in primary patency after 14 days,6 months and 2 years thereafter in favour of the stentgraft;Both groups showed good clinical results without significant difference in 1-year survival and hepatic encephalopathy occurrence;Costs to establish TIPSS and maintain 2-year follow-up for constant patency were 66570 yuan in BMS group and 70455 yuan in PTFE-stentgraft.Conclusion TIPSS is a safe and effective procedure to manage portal hypertension. Both BMS stent and PTFE-stentgraft enable good technical and clinical outcomes with low complication rate,while the primary patency rate is clearly in favour of the stentgraft with a relative high costs.

Key words: Portal hypertension, Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, Bare metal stent, polytetrafluoroethylene-stentgraft