实用肝脏病杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (1): 73-76.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2026.01.019

• 肝衰竭 • 上一篇    下一篇

COSSH-ACLFⅡ评分联合LSR评估HBV相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者预后临床价值研究*

马凤锦, 陈玉升, 周明凯, 韩冰莎, 赵亮, 郑凯娟   

  1. 450000 郑州市第三人民医院重症医学科(马凤锦,郑凯娟,赵亮);河南省人民医院神经外科(陈玉升,韩冰莎);郑州大学第二附属医院重症医学科(周明凯)
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-15 出版日期:2026-01-10 发布日期:2026-02-04
  • 通讯作者: 赵亮,E-mail:cys0367@126.com
  • 作者简介:马凤锦,女,42岁,医学硕士,副主任医师。E-mail:cys0401@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    *河南省医学科技攻关计划项目(编号:SBGJ202402010)

Application of COSSH-ACLF II score and LSR combination for evaluating prognosis of patients with HBV-related acute-on-chronic liver failure

Ma Fengjin, Chen Yusheng, Zhou Mingkai, et al   

  1. Intensive Care Unit, Third People's Hospital, Zhengzhou 450000, Henan Province, China
  • Received:2025-09-15 Online:2026-01-10 Published:2026-02-04

摘要: 目的 分析应用中国重症乙型肝炎研究学组-慢加急性肝衰竭Ⅱ(COSSH-ACLFⅡ)评分联合肝脾体积比值(LSR)评估乙型肝炎相关慢加急性肝衰竭(HBV-ACLF)患者预后的临床价值。方法 2022年2月~2025年2月我院收治的HBV-ACLF患者93例,均接受常规内科综合治疗,观察到90 d,记录生存情况。收集基线资料,行上腹部CT检查并计算LSR,采用多因素Logistic回归分析影响HBV-ACLF患者预后的相关因素,应用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)并计算曲线下面积(AUC)分析COSSH-ACLFⅡ评分联合LSR评估HBV-ACLF患者预后的效能。结果 本组HBV-ACLF患者90 d死亡45例(48.4%),生存48例(51.6%);死亡组COSSH-ACLFⅡ评分为为(8.2±0.7)分,显著高于生存组【(6.8±0.9)分,P<0.05】,而LSR为(1.5±0.9),现在低于生存组【(3.0±1.2),P<0.05】;死亡组年龄、血清总胆红素、凝血酶原时间国际标准化比值和终末期肝病模型评分均显著大于或高于生存组(P<0.05);多因素Logistic回归分析显示, COSSH-ACLFⅡ评分(OR=3.200,95% CI:1.458~7.021)是影响HBV-ACLF患者预后的独立危险因素,而LSR(OR=0.119,95% CI:0.027~0.520)是保护因素(P<0.05);ROC曲线分析显示,COSSH-ACLFⅡ评分联合LSR评估预后的AUC为0.940,其敏感度为86.7%,特异度为77.1%(P<0.05)。结论 应用COSSH-ACLFⅡ评分联合LSR预测HBV-ACLF患者预后有一定的临床价值,值得深入研究。

关键词: 慢加急性肝衰竭, 中国重症乙型肝炎研究学组-慢加急性肝衰竭Ⅱ评分, 肝脾体积比值, 预后

Abstract: Objective The aim of this study was to investigate Chinese Group for the Study of Severe Hepatitis B-acute-on-chronic liver failureⅡ(COSSH-ACLF II) score in combination with liver-to-spleen volume ratio (LSR) in predicting prognosis of patients with hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure (HBV-ACLF). Methods 93 patients with HBV-ACLF were enrolled in our hospital between February 2022 and February 2025, and all were carefully managed with routine comprehensive medical treatment. The patients were followed-up for 90 days and the survival was recorded. The baseline data of patients at admission were collected, including blood, biochemical and coagulation function routine, and upper abdominal CT examination for LSR calculation. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the related risk factors affecting the prognosis of patients with HBV-ACLF, and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was drawn and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to analyze the efficacy of COSSH-ACLF II score and LSR in predicting prognosis of patients with HBV-ACLF. Results 45 patients (48.4%) in our series died of liver failure and 48 patients survived, with 90 d survival rate of 51.6%; COSSH-ACLFⅡ score in dead group was (8.2±0.7) points, significantly greater than (6.8±0.9) points in survival group (P<0.05), and LSR was (1.5±0.9), significantly lower than (3.0±1.2) in survival group (P<0.05); the age, total serum bilirubin, international normalized ratio, model for end-stage liver disease score in dead group were significantly older or higher than those in survival group (P<0.05); multivariate Logistic regression analysis revealed that COSSH-ACLFⅡ score (OR=3.200, 95% CI: 1.458-7.021) was an independent risk factor affecting the prognosis of patients with HBV-ACLF, while the LSR (OR=0.119, 95% CI: 0.027-0.520) was a protective factor (P<0.05); ROC analysis showed that the AUC of COSSH-ACLFⅡ score in combination with LSR was 0.940, with a sensitivity of 86.7% and a specificity of 77.1%, much superior to any parameter did alone (P<0.05). Conclusion Application of COSSH-ACLF II score and LSR is efficacious in predicting prognosis of patients with HBV-ACLF, which warrants further clinical investigation.

Key words: Acute-on-chronic liver failure, Chinese Group for the Study of Severe Hepatitis B-acute-on-chronic liver failureⅡscore, Liver-to-spleen volume ratio, Prognosis