实用肝脏病杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (6): 936-939.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2018.06.027

• 肝癌 • 上一篇    下一篇

索拉菲尼治疗进展期原发性肝癌患者有效性及安全性研究*

汪华, 赵亚宁   

  1. 721008 陕西省宝鸡市 西安交通大学医学院附属宝鸡市中心医院肿瘤内科
  • 收稿日期:2018-02-26 出版日期:2018-11-10 发布日期:2018-12-25
  • 作者简介:汪华,女,40岁,大学本科,副主任医师。主要从事肿瘤内科研究 。E-mail: xsthww456@sina.com
  • 基金资助:
    *宝鸡市科学技术局科研基金资助项目(编号:2015SH2-1-2)

Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in the treatment of patients with advanced primary liver cancer

Wang Hua, Zhao Yaning.   

  1. Department of Oncology,Central Hospital Affiliated to Medical School,Xi'an JiaoTong University,Baiji 721008,Shaanxi Province,China
  • Received:2018-02-26 Online:2018-11-10 Published:2018-12-25

摘要: 目的 探讨应用索拉菲尼治疗进展期原发性肝癌(aPLC)患者的有效性和安全性。方法 2013年4月~2016年12月我科诊治的aPLC患者82例,采用随机数字表法分为两组,每组41例。两组均给予射频消融术(RFA)治疗,观察组患者在RFA前后接受索拉菲尼治疗,观察12 w。采用ELISA法检测血清碱性成纤维细胞生长因子(bFGF)和血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)。结果 2例观察组患者被剔除,3例对照组患者失访;在治疗12 w末,观察组疾病控制率为61.5%,与对照组的52.6%比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但观察组肿瘤客观有效率为48.7%,显著高于对照组的26.3%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组血清AFP、bFGF和VEGF水平分别为(184.7±10.5)μg/L、(3.8±1.3) pg/mL和(172.3±25.4) pg/mL,均显著低于对照组的(213.6±11.6) μg/L、(6.4±2.0) pg/mL和(210.5±28.3) pg/mL,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组中位无进展生存期(PFS)为10.2个月(95%CI为7.4~11.5),对照组为7.9个月(95%CI为 6.0~10.1),经Log-rank检验显示两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组在服药过程中手足综合征、皮疹、白细胞减少、口腔黏膜炎、脱发和肝功能异常发生率分别为43.6%、25.6%、17.9%、20.5%、25.6%和23.1%,显著高于对照组的0.0%、2.6%、0.0%、0.0%、0.0%和5.3%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 索拉菲尼可控制aPLC患者实体瘤扩散,延长无进展生存期,但索拉菲尼可引起多种不良反应,在用药过程中应注意观察并及时采取相应处理措施,以防止发生严重不良反应。

关键词: 原发性肝癌, 射频消融术, 索拉菲尼, 生存期, 不良反应

Abstract: Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of sorafenib in the treatment of patients with advanced primary liver cancer (aPLC). Methods 82 patients with aPLC were recruited in our hospital between April 2013 and December 2016,and were divided randomly into two groups with 41 in each by computer-generated numbers. All patients received radiofrequency ablation (RFA),patients in the observation group received oral sorafenib daily,and all patients were followed-up for 12 weeks. Serum basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) and vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF) levels were detected by ELISA,and the efficacy was evaluated by the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors(RECIST). Results Two patients in the observation group were kicked off because of bad obedience,and three in the control failed to revisit. At the end of 12 week follow-up,the disease control rate in the observation group was 61.5%,without significant difference as compared with 52.6% in control group (P>0.05),while the Objective effective rate in the observation group was 48.7%,much higher than 26.3% in the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);serum levels of AFP,bFGF and VEGF were (184.7±10.5) μg/L,(3.8±1.3) pg/mL and (172.3±25.4) pg/mL in the observation group,much lower than(213.6±11.6)μg/L,(6.4±2.0) pg/mL and(210.5±28.3) pg/mL,respectively in the control(P<0.05);the progression-free survival (PFS) in the observation group was 10.2 months(95%CI:7.4-11.5),while it was 7.9 months (95%CI: 6.0-10.1) in the control,which was significantly different by Log-rank test (P<0.05);the incidence rates of hand-foot skin syndrome,skin rash,leukopenia,oral mucositis,hair loss and abnormal liver function tests in the observation group were 43.6%,25.6%,17.9%,20.5%,25.6% and 23.1%,much higher than 0.0%,2.6%,0.0%,0.0%,0.0% and 5.3% in the control (P<0.05). Conclusion Sorafenib might inhibit the growth of solid tumors in patients with aPLC, and might thereby prolong the progression-free survival. However,the application of sorafenib can cause a variety of adverse reactions,which should be taken into consideration and the clinicians should take measures in time to deal with them.

Key words: Hepatoma, Advanced, Radiofrequency ablation, Sorafenib, Survival, Adverse reactions