实用肝脏病杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (5): 755-758.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2025.05.029

• 肝癌 • 上一篇    下一篇

CEUS与增强CT/MRI LI-RADS分类诊断小肝细胞癌应用研究*

李新, 梅文娟, 张昊月   

  1. 471000 河南省洛阳市 河南科技大学第一附属医院超声医学科
  • 收稿日期:2024-07-18 出版日期:2025-09-10 发布日期:2025-09-19
  • 作者简介:李新,女,35岁,硕士研究生,主治医师。研究方向:腹部脏器与浅表器官超声诊断。E-mail:chenqiyue0723@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    *河南省科技厅医学科技攻关计划项目(编号:LHGJ20200592)

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and enhanced CT/MRI LI-RADS classification in the diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma

Li Xin, Mei Wenjuan, Zhang Haoyue   

  1. Department of Ultrasound, First Affiliated Hospital, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471000, Henan Province, China
  • Received:2024-07-18 Online:2025-09-10 Published:2025-09-19

摘要: 目的 比较超声造影(CEUS)与增强CT(CECT)/磁共振成像(MRI) 肝脏影像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)分类诊断小肝细胞癌(sHCC)的价值。方法 2019年1月~2023年12月我院诊治的肝内小结节病灶患者102例,纳入患者肝内结节均≤1 cm,同时接受CEUS和CECT/MRI检查,应用LI-RADS系统分类,经穿刺活检或术后组织病理学检查诊断。结果 在102例肝内病灶中,CEUS判定为LR3、LR4、LR5和LRM分别为11例、13例、67例和11例,与CECT/MRI判定的结果(分别为18例、20例、61例和3例)比,存在显著性差异(P=0.033);经组织病理学检查诊断sHCC者92例,混合性肝癌2例和肝硬化结节4例,局灶性增生性结节(FPN)4例;CEUS诊断的灵敏度、特异度和准确性分别为62.5%、98.9%和96.1%,与CECT/MRI诊断的75.0%、97.9%和96.1%比,无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论 CECT/MRI与CEUS均可应用于对肝内结节性病灶的性质判断。临床上,这些检查往往相互印证,以早期做出适当的诊断,帮助临床决策。

关键词: 小肝细胞癌, 超声造影, 增强CT, 磁共振成像, 肝脏影像报告和数据系统, 诊断

Abstract: Objective The aim of this study was to investigate diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography(CEUS) and enhanced CT (CECT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) liver image reporting and data system (LI-RADS) in the diagnosis of patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma (sHCC). Methods A total of 102 patients with intrahepatic space-occupying lesions (SOL) were encountered in our hospital between January 2019 and December 2023, and the patients enrolled all had SOL less than 1 cm. All patients underwent CEUS and CECT /MRI check-up, intrahepatic SOL were assorted based on LI-RADS, and diagnosis was determined by histo-pathological examination. Results Of 102 SOL, CEUS judged as LR3, LR4, LR5 and LRM in 11, 13, 67 and 11 cases, significantly different as compared to 18,20, 61 and 3 cases by CECT/MRI did(P=0.033); final diagnosis was made by pathological examination and showed sHCC in 92 cases and mixed liver cancer in 2 cases, and benign lesions in 8 cases, including cirrhotic nodules in 4 cases and focal proliferative nodule (FPN) in 4 cases; sensitivity, specificity and accuracy by CEUS were 62.5%, 98.9% and 96.1%, all not significantly different compared to 75.0%,97.9% and 96.1% by CECT/MRI (P>0.05). Conclusion CECT/MRI and CEUS could help clinicians make an appropriate diagnosis early in patients with intrahepatic small SOL, and we recommend the LI-RADS for relatively correct diagnosis. For patients with intrahepatic SOL, the histo-pathological examination is never too important in clinical practice.

Key words: Hepatocellular carcinoma, Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, Contrast- enhanced CT, Magnetic resonance imaging, Liver imaging reporting and data system, Diagnosis