实用肝脏病杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (5): 735-738.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2025.05.024

• 肝硬化 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于北京PIR分型标准评价恩替卡韦治疗乙型肝炎肝硬化患者疗效研究*

陈洁, 杨才敏, 彭彩玲, 徐辉   

  1. 644000 四川省宜宾市第三人民医院感染病科(陈洁,杨才敏,彭彩玲);川北医学院附属三台医院感染病科(徐辉)
  • 收稿日期:2024-09-25 出版日期:2025-09-10 发布日期:2025-09-19
  • 作者简介:陈洁,女,44岁,大学本科,主治医师。E-mail:40085945@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    *四川省绵阳市卫生健康委员会科研课题(编号:202348)

Evaluation of histological changes based on Beijing standard in patients with hepatitis B-induced liver cirrhosis during entecavir antiviral therapy

Chen Jie, Yang Caimin, Peng Cailing, et al   

  1. Department of Infectious Diseases, Third People's Hospital, Yibin 644000, Sichuan Province, China
  • Received:2024-09-25 Online:2025-09-10 Published:2025-09-19

摘要: 目的 基于北京标准评价恩替卡韦治疗的乙型肝炎肝硬化患者的疗效。方法 2021年7月~2024年7月我院收治的乙型肝炎肝硬化患者145例,均接受恩替卡韦抗病毒治疗。采用实时荧光定量PCR法检测血清HBV DNA载量,使用FibroScan 502弹性扫描仪行肝硬度检测(LSM)。常规行肝活检,行Ishak纤维化评分和Knodell组织学活动指数(HAI)评分,并按北京标准,将治疗后肝组织学变化分为进展为主型(P)、不确定型(I)和逆转为主型(R)。结果 在治疗12个月末,病理学检查发现在145例乙型肝炎肝硬化患者中组织学表现为P型、I型和R型分别为45例(31.0%)、32例(22.1%)和68例(46.9%);P型基线有饮酒史、血清HBV DNA载量和HBsAg水平分别为46.7%、(7.6±1.8)lg IU/mL和(8751.9±220.5)IU/mL,显著高于R型【分别为23.5%、(5.7±1.6)lg IU/mL和(2003.0±60.9)IU/mL, P<0.05】或I型【分别为34.4%、(6.5±1.7)lg IU/mL和(4312.4±111.4)IU/mL,P<0.05】;在治疗12个月末,P型血清ALT、AST、LSM、Ishak评分和HAI评分分别为(47.9±13.1)U/L、(53.1±14.2)U/L、(6.7±1.7)kPa、(3.6±0.4)分和(5.1±0.5)分,显著高于R型【分别为(36.2±10.9)U/L、(37.0±11.2)U/L、(5.2±1.2)kPa、(3.2±0.3)分和(4.5±0.3)分,P<0.05】; ALT复常率和HBV DNA转阴率分别为46.7%和71.1%,均显著低于R型的100.0%和100.0%(P<0.05)。结论 恩替卡韦治疗的乙型肝炎肝硬化患者肝组织病理学变化可能不同,参照北京标准可以清楚地进行分层研究,以探究影响疗效的因素,值得深入研究。

关键词: 肝硬化, 乙型肝炎, 恩替卡韦, 肝组织学北京分型, 治疗

Abstract: Objective The aim of this study was to investigate antiviral efficacy of entecavir (ETV) based on Beijing Standard in patients with hepatitis B-induced liver cirrhosis (LC). Method 145 patients with hepatitis B-induced LC were treated with ETV for 12 months in our hospital between July 2021 and July 2024. Serum HBV DNA loads were detected by PCR, and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) was finished by FibroScan 502 elastography. Liver biopsies was completed and evaluated by Ishak and Knodell scores, and reassessed by Beijing standard for predominantly progressive (P), indeterminate(I) and predominately regressive (R) typing. Result By end of 12 month treatment, liver histo-pathological examination showed out of the 145 patients with LC, liver injuries demonstrated in P typing, I typing and R typing were 45 cases(31.0%), 32 cases (22.1%) and 68 cases (46.9%), respectively; alcohol hobby, serum HBV DNA load and HBsAg levels at baseline in P group were 46.7%, (7.6±1.8)lg IU/mL and (8751.9±220.5)IU/mL, all significantly higher than [23.5%, (5.7±1.6)lg IU/mL and (2003.0±60.9)IU/mL, respectively, P<0.05] in R group or [34.4%, (6.5±1.7)lg IU/mL and (4312.4±111.4)IU/mL, respectively, P<0.05] in I group; by end of 12 month treatment, serum ALT, AST, LSM, Ishak score and histological activity index score in P group were (47.9±13.1)U/L, (53.1±14.2)U/L, (6.7±1.7)kPa, (3.6±0.4) points and (5.1±0.5)points, all significantly higher than [(36.2±10.9)U/L, (37.0±11.2)U/L, (5.2±1.2)kPa, (3.2±0.3) points and (4.5±0.3)points, respectively, P<0.05] in R group; serum ALT normalization rate and HBV DNA loss rate in P group were 46.7% and 71.1%, both much lower than 100.0% and 100.0%(P<0.05) in R group. Conclusion Liver histo-pathological response to ETV antiviral treatment varies, which might assessed by Beijing standard for efficacy classification.

Key words: Liver cirrhosis, Hepatitis B, Entecavir, PIR typing, Therapy