实用肝脏病杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (4): 585-588.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2025.04.027

• 肝硬化 • 上一篇    下一篇

索磷布韦联合维帕他韦治疗丙型肝炎肝硬化患者临床疗效和门脉超声检查指标变化研究*

施海群, 钱杰, 沈国倩, 赵萌   

  1. 215000 江苏省苏州市第五人民医院超声科(施海群,钱杰,沈国倩);南京医科大学附属苏州医院/苏州市立医院超声中心(赵萌)
  • 收稿日期:2025-02-25 出版日期:2025-07-10 发布日期:2025-07-14
  • 通讯作者: 沈国倩,E-mail:13815288244@163.com
  • 作者简介:施海群,女,43岁,大学本科,副主任医师。E-mail:13952909782@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    *江苏省苏州市科技局科研项目(编号:SYS2020190)

Satisfactory response to sofosbuvir and velpatasvir combination regimen in patients with hepatitis C-induced liver cirrhosis

Shi Haiqun, Qian Jie, Shen Guoqian, et al   

  1. Department of Ultrasound, Fifth People's Hospital, Suzhou 215000, Jiangsu Province, China
  • Received:2025-02-25 Online:2025-07-10 Published:2025-07-14

摘要: 目的 观察索磷布韦联合维帕他韦治疗丙型肝炎肝硬化患者的临床疗效及其超声检查的门脉指标的变化。方法 2021年6月~2024年6月我院收治的54例丙型肝炎肝硬化(代偿期31例,失代偿期23例)患者,给予所有患者索磷布韦和维帕他韦治疗,另给予失代偿期患者利巴韦林联合治疗,均持续治疗12周。采用荧光定量PCR法检测血清HCV RNA载量,采用放射免疫分析法检测血清透明质酸(HA)、Ⅲ型前胶原(PCⅢ)、Ⅳ型胶原(Ⅳ-C)和层粘连蛋白(LN),常规行肝脏硬度检测(LSM)及门静脉内径(PVD)和脾脏厚度(ST)检测。结果 本组丙型肝炎肝硬化患者经索磷布韦和维帕他韦或联合巴韦林治疗,获得持续性病毒学应答率为94.4%,除1例基因1型和2例基因3型感染者外,均获得SVR;在治疗1个月、3个月和停药后3个月,代偿期肝硬化患者病毒学应答(VR)均为100.0%,而失代偿期肝硬化患者则分别为78.3%、82.6%和87.0%;治疗后,代偿期患者血清HA、PCⅢ和Ⅳ-C水平分别为(92.6±21.4)μg/L、(127.2±28.4)μg/L和(105.6±26.8)μg/L,均显著低于失代偿期【分别为(139.4±35.8)μg/L、(197.6±34.8)μg/L和(166.2±32.9)μg/L,P<0.05】;代偿期患者LSM和PVD分别为(18.2±2.1) kPa和(13.4±1.3)mm,均显著低于失代偿期患者【分别为(20.7±2.3)kPa和(15.8±1.1)mm,P<0.05】。结论 应用索磷布韦和维帕他韦联合或不联合利巴韦林治疗丙型肝炎肝硬化患者疗效好,安全。

关键词: 肝硬化, 丙型肝炎, 索磷布韦, 维帕他韦, 治疗

Abstract: Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical efficacy of sofosbuvir and velpatasvir combination regimen in the treatment of patients with hepatitis C-induced liver cirrhosisand its influence on ultrasonic indexes of portal vain. Methods 54 patients with hepatitis C-induced liver cirrhosis, including compensated in 31 cases and decompensated in 23 cases, were enrolled in our hospital between June 2021 and June 2024, patients with compensated liver cirrhosis received sofosbuvir and velpatasvir combination, and those with decompensated liver cirrhosis received ribavirin at base of sofosbuvir and velpatasvir combination. Antiviral therapy lasted for 12 weeks. Serum HCV RNA loads were detected by fluorescenct quantitative RT-PCR, and serum hyaluronic acid (HA), type III procollagen (PCIII), type IV collagen (IV-C) and laminin (LN) levels were assayed immunoradiometric assay. Liver stiffness measurement (LSM), portal vein diameter (PVD) and spleen thickness (ST) were measured by Fibrotouch or ultrasonic diagnostic instrument. Results The sustained viral response (SVR) rate in our series was 94.4%, all but one with HCV genotype 1 and two with HCV genotype 3 responded completely to the antiviral therapy; virological response rate in patients with compensated cirrhosis at month one, month three and three months after discontinuation of antiviral therapy were all 100.0%, while in those with decompensated cirrhosis were 78.3%, 82.6% and 87.0%, respectively; after treatment, serum HA, PCⅢ and Ⅳ-C levels in patients with compensated cirrhosis were (92.6±21.4)μg/L, (127.2±28.4)μg/Land (105.6±26.8)μg/L, all significantly lower than [(139.4±35.8)μg/L, (197.6±34.8)μg/Land (166.2±32.9)μg/L, respectively, P<0.05] in those with decompensated cirrhosis; LSM and PVD were (18.2±2.1) kPa and (13.4±1.3)mm, both much less than [(20.7±2.3)kPa and (15.8±1.1)mm, respectively, P<0.05] in those with decompensated cirrhosis. Conclusion Sofosbuvir and velpatasvir combination with or without ribavirin in the treatment of patients with hepatitis C-induced liver cirrhosis is efficacious, which warrants further clinical observation.

Key words: Liver cirrhosis, Hepatitis C, Sofosbuvir, Velpatasvir, Therapy