实用肝脏病杂志 ›› 2014, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (6): 611-615.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2014.06.013

• 肝衰竭 • 上一篇    下一篇

组合式连续性静脉-静脉血浆滤过-胆红素吸附治疗肝衰竭患者的疗效与护理观察*

李墨奇, 寿玉立, 蒲林娟, 王琴, 柏晓鑫, 张月莎, 黄唯麟, 王代红   

  1. 400037重庆市 第三军医大学新桥医院肾内科血液净化中心
  • 收稿日期:2014-05-10 出版日期:2014-12-31 发布日期:2016-04-11
  • 通讯作者: 黄唯麟,E-mail:83455766@qq.com
  • 作者简介:李墨奇,女,31岁,大学本科,主管护师。主要从事特殊血液净化的护理研究。E-mail:heqiaolmq@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    重庆市应用开发计划项目(cstc2013yykfA110009)

Efficacy of combined continuous veno-venous hemofiltration and bilirubin adsorption therapy in patients with hepatic failure

Li Moqi, Shou Yuli, Pu Linjuan   

  1. Department of Nephrology,Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University,Chongqing 400037,China
  • Received:2014-05-10 Online:2014-12-31 Published:2016-04-11

摘要: 目的探讨组合式连续性静脉-静脉血浆滤过-胆红素吸附治疗肝衰竭患者的效果及护理方法。方法通过组合式连续性静脉-静脉血浆滤过-胆红素吸附(n=32)和序贯血浆吸附联合连续性肾脏替代治疗(CRRT,n=44)肝衰竭患者,比较两种治疗方式在治疗效果、治疗时间、治疗费用、护理工作量、并发症发生率方面的差异。结果在治疗7 d时,组合式连续性静脉-静脉血浆滤过-胆红素吸附治疗组总胆红素为(161.1±45.1)μmol/L,胆汁酸为(135.0±60.5) μmol/L,谷草转氨酶为(152.4±96.3) IU/L,谷丙转氨酶为(147.2±72.6) IU/L,INR为(1.6±0.4),显著优于序贯血浆吸附联合CRRT治疗组患者[总胆红素(218.9±58.5) μmol/L,胆汁酸(198.6±49.6) μmol/L,谷草转氨酶(252.4±169.1) IU/L,谷丙转氨酶(220.1±110.3) IU/L,INR(2.0±0.5),P<0.05];在护理工作量方面,组合式连续性静脉-静脉血浆滤过-胆红素吸附治疗准备时间为(1.0±0.1) h,治疗时间(7.2±0.5)h,治疗费用为(1.1±0.1)万元,显著优于序贯血浆吸附联合CRRT治疗组[分别为(1.3±0.1) h、(11.1±0.7) h和(1.3±0.1)万元,P<0.05];两种治疗方法并发症的发生率相似。结论组合式连续性静脉-静脉血浆滤过-胆红素吸附治疗肝衰竭患者的疗效优于序贯血浆吸附联合CRRT治疗,能有效降低护理工作量和治疗成本。

关键词: 肝衰竭, 组合式连续性静脉-静脉血浆滤过-胆红素吸附, 连续性肾脏替代治疗, 疗效

Abstract: Objective To observe the efficacy and nursing care of combined continuous veno-venous hemofiltration and bilirubin adsorption therapy in patients with hepatic failure. MethodsThe effectiveness, treatment duration,complication incidence,treatment costs and nursing workload were compared between 32 patients treated with combined continuous veno-venous hemofiltration and bilirubin adsorption therapy and 44 patients treated with sequential plasma adsorption and continuous renal replacement treatment. Results On the 7th day of treatment,the efficacy of combined continuous veno-venous hemofiltration and bilirubin adsorption therapy were superior to that of sequential plasma adsorption and continuous renal replacement treatment [total bilirubin (161.1±45.1)vs.(218.9±58.5) μmol/L,bile acid(130.5±60.5) vs. (198.6±49.6) μmol/L,aspartate aminotransferase (152.4±96.3) vs. (252.4±169.1) IU/L,alanine transaminase (147.2±72.6) vs.(220.1±110.3) IU/L,international normalized ratio (1.6±0.4) vs. (1.6±0.4),preparing time (1.0±0.1) vs. (1.3±0.1) h,treatment duration (7.2±0.5) vs. (11.1±0.7) h and treatment costs(11.0±1.0) vs.(13±1.0) grand RMB,P<0.05 for all]. Complication incidence in both groups showed no difference. ConclusionCombined continuous veno-venous hemofiltration and bilirubin adsorption therapy has preferable efficacy in treatment of patients with liver failure,and effectively reduces the nursing workload and treatment costs.

Key words: Liver failure, Combined continuous veno-venous hemofiltration and bilirubin adsorption therapy, Continuous renal replacement treatment, Efficacy, Nursing care