实用肝脏病杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (3): 394-397.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2025.03.019

• 肝衰竭 • 上一篇    下一篇

血浆置换联合血液滤过治疗慢加急性乙型肝炎肝衰竭患者疗效研究*

李勇飞, 许正锯, 叶巧霞, 威晋   

  1. 362000 福建省泉州市 解放军联勤保障部队第九一○医院感染病科(李勇飞,许正锯,叶巧霞);福建医科大学附属协和医院放射科(威晋)
  • 收稿日期:2024-07-08 发布日期:2025-05-14
  • 通讯作者: 许正锯,E-mail:h180@163.com
  • 作者简介:李勇飞,男,41岁,大学本科,主治医师。E-mail:lyfufoo@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    *福建省泉州市科技局科研计划项目(编号:2023C020YR)

Efficacy of plasma exchange and hemofiltration in the treatment of patients with acute-on-chronic hepatitis B liver failure

Li Yongfei, Xu Zhengju, Ye Qiaoxia, et al   

  1. Department of Infectious Disease, 910th Hospital, Joint Logistics Support Force, Quanzhou 362000, Fujian Province, China
  • Received:2024-07-08 Published:2025-05-14

摘要: 目的 观察比较发病不同时间启动血浆置换(PE)联合血液滤过(HF)治疗慢加急性乙型肝炎肝衰竭(HBV-ACLF)患者的疗效。方法 2021年3月~2024年3月我院收治的126例HBV-ACLF患者,使用日本山阳电子工业生产的KM-9000型血液净化装置进行PE治疗,使用日本山阳电子工业生产的KM-9000型血液净化装置进行HF治疗,其中37例对照组在入院72 h后,而89例观察组在入院72 h内启动人工肝治疗。结果 观察组人工肝治疗(3.4±1.4)次,显著少于对照组【(4.6±1.1)次,P<0.05】,而观察组28 d和90 d生存率分别为84.2%和67.4%,显著高于对照组的67.6%和48.6%(P<0.05);在治疗3个月末,对照组和观察组血清HBV DNA转阴率均为100.0%(P>0.05);在人工肝治疗前后,两组血钾、血钠和血氯水平差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);在经过平均3个月,60例观察组生存者血清TBIL、凝血酶原活动度(PTA)和血清白蛋白水平分别为(25.8±7.6)μmol/L、(68.2±9.3)%和(34.7±2.8)g/L,与18例对照组生存者比,无显著性差异【分别为(28.4±5.9)μmol/L、(63.7±8.6)%和(35.6±2.5)g/L,P<0.05】。结论 对于明确诊断的肝衰竭患者,在入院后尽早启动人工肝治疗可能能提高救治成功率,任何的观望和拖延都可能不利于改善预后。

关键词: 慢加急性肝衰竭, 血浆置换, 血液滤过, 治疗

Abstract: Objective The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of plasma exchange (PE) and hemofiltration (HF) at different start-up time in the treatment of patients with acute-on-chronic hepatitis B liver failure (HBV-ACLF). Methods 126 patients with HBV-ACLF were enrolled in our hospital between March 2021 and March 2024, and all patients underwent PE/HF therapy. Artificial liver supporting system (ALSS) treatment started early (less than 72 hours after admission) in 89 cases (observation), and started lately (72 hours thereafter) in 37 cases (control). Results ALSS carried out repeatedly for (3.4±1.4)times in the observation group, much less than [(4.6±1.1)times, P<0.05] in the control, while 28-day and 90 day survivals were 84.2% and 67.4%, much higher than 67.6% and 48.6%(P<0.05) in the control; by three months after treatment, serum HBV DNA went to negative in all the patients in the two groups; there were no significant differences as respect to serum potassium, sodium and chlorine levels before and after ALSS treatment in the two groups(P>0.05); after treatment, total serum bilirubin level, prothrombin time activity and serum albumin level in 60 survivals in the observation group were (25.8±7.6)μmol/L, (68.2±9.3)% and (34.7±2.8)g/L, not significantly different as compared to [(28.4±5.9)μmol/L, (63.7±8.6)% and (35.6±2.5)g/L, respectively, P<0.05] in 18 survivals in the control group. Conclusion ALSS treatment should start as early as possible after admission in patients with ACLF, and any delay and hesitancy might decrease successful rescue rate.

Key words: Acute-on-chronic liver failure;Plasma exchange, hemofiltration, Therapy